Quote of the Day: Romney’s Uneven Israel Trip?

Wolverton, Cagle Cartoons

Was presumptive Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s a big success that will burnish his foreign policy credentials in the general election? Or was it another gaffe fest? Our political Quote of the Day comes via First Read which argues there were no major disasters on it to feed the perception reflected in the Wolverton cartoon above.

But it (again) wasn’t something that takes him beyond playing to the GOP base:
*** Recapping Romney’s Israel stop: Fortunately for Mitt Romney and his campaign, the visit to Israel went much smoother than the stop in Great Britain. But there were still some snafus… In his speech yesterday in Jerusalem, Romney checked all the boxes. He embraced Israel. “We’re part of the great fellowship of democracies. We speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace.” He talked tough on Iran. “We must not delude ourselves into thinking that containment is an option. We must lead the effort to prevent Iran from building and possessing nuclear weapons capability.” And he even made a subtle dig at President Obama, referring to the tension between the Obama administration and Israel’s conservative Netanyahu government. “Diplomatic distance in public between our nations emboldens Israel’s adversaries.” But what Romney DIDN’T SAY was almost as striking — if not more so. Not once did he utter the phrase “peace process” nor the words “Palestine” or “Palestinian,” and that also means he never talked about or made the case for a two-state solution. Was the speech for anyone other than base Republicans? This trip to Israel felt like a primary trip, not one aimed at the general election.

*** More snafus:
As mentioned above, Team Romney still had some problems while in Israel. For starters, a top adviser on Israel matters — Dan Senor — suggested that Romney was set to support a unilateral strike by Israel on Iran, the New York Times noted. “If Israel has to take action on its own, the governor would respect that decision,” Senor said in a briefing before Romney’s speech yesterday. But Romney later walked back Senor’s remarks, telling ABC: “I think I’ll use my own terms in that regard and that is that I recognize the right of Israel to defend itself.” Also, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that Romney canceling his meeting with an Israeli opposition party figure upset folks there. And a Palestinian official criticized Romney for asserting that Jerusalem is Israel’s true capital, the AP said. “The Palestinians want to establish a capital in east Jerusalem, captured and annexed by Israel in 1967. Most of the world, including the U.S., does not recognize the annexation. The U.S. and others keep their embassies in Tel Aviv.” What’s more the same Palestinian official also criticized Romney for suggesting that Israel’s culture is superior to the Palestinians’. So it wasn’t England, but Romney was still 1) making folks mad, and 2) having to walk back remarks.
This suggests:
1. His trip was not as successful as Barack Obama’s foreign trip as a Presidential candidate. These trips are “do no harm” trips where there may be some residue backlash (Obama’s actually seemed to hurt him in the polls afterwards since voters apparently concluded it was what it was: an exercise in image enhancement). Controversies are not meant to swirl around a candidate.
2. The Romney narrative continues: he continues to run a campaign playing to the party’s base and not trying to expand his existing constituency, which in some cases supports him not because they like him but because they hate Obama. This could be a smart strategy if, in fact, due to the economy’s performance his attraction as the anti-Obama remains strong. But his trip didn’t alter his existing space in the political spectrum or expand his existing constituency.

LEGAL NOTICE ON CARTOON: This copyrighted cartoon is licensed to run on TMV. Reproduction elsewhere without licensing is strictly prohibited. See great cartoons by all the top political cartoonists at http://cagle.com. To license this cartoon for your own site, visit http://politicalcartoons.com

  

5 Comments

  1. Much ado about nothing.
    And, how goes the economy, Mr. President.

  2. dduck – The comment about Jerusalem and Israel’s right to defensively attack Iran are to be expected of a political visit to Israel.

    However, comparing Israel and Palestine economically and culturally is REALLY stupid. This just feeds Israel’s arrogance. My guess, from a 50 year association with the country and it’s people, is that a significant majority of Israeli Jews feel superior to any other peoples, including Americans.

    I think Romney, in his gut, considers Israelis to be elite like himself and the Palestinians to be riff-raff, like non-wealthy Americans.

    To compare Israel to Palestinians economically is very unfair. Israel makes economic life in the West Bank almost impossible for any business except services. Palestinians cannot import anything except what Israel allows and Israel does NOT allow any Palestinian business to compete with Israeli produced goods. If Intel wanted to build a chip factory in Ramallah, for example, I can guarantee you 100% Israel would NOT allow it.

    Even agricultural goods produced by Palestinians usually cannot be exported. Just go to the Allenby Bridge during Harvest season and look at the line of trucks with rotting tomatoes, olives and oranges etc.

    Romney does not understand the Mideast at all. He as much as said FU to arabs and Palestinians in his haste to find favor with Israel and his Jewish contributors. An American President has to navigate the entire Globe diplomatically and Romney doesn’t look like he is up to the task.

  3. I agree about the conditions, and I don’t expect any presidential candidate to be truly up to speed AND to be candid. Would Obama? Nope.

  4. Romney has made some mistakes this trip but has certainly not been helped by the media, which has decided to frame Romney as an endless series of gaffes. Even policy-directed comments, such as those related to Palestine or Iran, are reported as who the comment has upset instead of as the implications of the policy itself.

    John Kerry was perceived as a waffler and certainly bears some responsibility for that perception, but the perception was magnified by the media willingness to perpetuate that theme. Romney is in the same boat.

  5. “Romney is in the same boat.”
    DG, very swift, intentional?

Submit a Comment