An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Can the President Shut Down the Internet?

Should we pass a bill giving the President unfettered authority to shut down the internet during a crisis and access any and all data from anyone while allowing him sole discretion to determine what constitutes a crisis and when one occurs? What could possibly go wrong?

Should President Obama have the power to shut down domestic Internet traffic during a state of emergency?

Senators John Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) think so. On Wednesday they introduced a bill to establish the Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor—an arm of the executive branch that would have vast power to monitor and control Internet traffic to protect against threats to critical cyber infrastructure. That broad power is rattling some civil libertarians.

The potential for cyber-attacks on the nation’s infrastructure, military and intelligence assets or government records is very real. We’ve known about this vulnerability for some time and a movie was even made about such a scenario. Therefore, I can see the need for a measure such as this. But before we rush into passing such a law, there are a few aspects which may need a closer look.

The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (PDF) gives the president the ability to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” and shut down or limit Internet traffic in any “critical” information network “in the interest of national security.” The bill does not define a critical information network or a cybersecurity emergency. That definition would be left to the president.

The bill does not only add to the power of the president. It also grants the Secretary of Commerce “access to all relevant data concerning [critical] networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access.” This means he or she can monitor or access any data on private or public networks without regard to privacy laws.

Such laws are fine and dandy if you happen to live under a benevolent despot, but from my particularly libertarian point of view, truly benevolent despots tend to be few and far between. Shutting down internet activity quickly when a cyber-incursion is detected may need to be an option, but it should come under immediate review by some congressional entity before the situation has a chance to get out of control in either direction.

As for access to “all relevant data concerning critical networks,” that’s just a frightening phrase. Surely we can have a process where a warrant will be required, even if it’s a retroactive warrant through a FISA court. Handing out powers which are too broad raises my hackles and this just brings back images of certain portions of the so-called “Patriot Act.” This is a road we don’t need to go down again.

Far too many things have been rushed recklessly through this new Congress. Let’s not allow this to be yet another.

  • AustinRoth
    Hope and change people, hope and change. Good thing our new President doesn't have any tendencies towards trampling on our freedoms like the Evil BushHitler and the Devil Himself Dick Cheney. Nope, he is just a humble servant devoted to His People. And all he He asks in return is unquestioned, unfettered power, the right to train our youth in mandatory volunteer programs, and to run the private and public sectors of the economy. Seems like a fair trade.

    All snarkyness aside, how much more of this has to happen before even the Left side of the equation starts getting a little nervous about his ambitions?
  • JD_Rhoades
    I'm sorry, Austin, I must have missed the part of the story where it says President Obama is demanding this power or that he introduced the bill. Can you point that out for me?

    Looks like Obama Derangement Syndrome is in full flower here at TMV. Now tell us how he's to blame for the shootings in NY. Be sure to call him The One or The Messiah like you folks are so fond of doing.
  • Silhouette
    It's a redundant question. The CIA will do whatever it deems necessary to protect the nation anyway. Circumventing the Constitution and law is old hat to them (obviously). We would never even know and likely be told the blackout was caused by a solar flare or some such.

    They have mechanisms in place right now to do exactly this in an emergency.
  • AustinRoth
    JD - yes, I am sure you are right.

    Congress likely just decided to give the President and the Executive branch sweeping new powers all on their own, maybe as a 'Happy First 100 Days' present. The only bummer is now the surprise has been ruined.

    Can't see why that wasn't as obvious to me as it was to you. Must be my ODS.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    Why, yes, AR, it probably is your ODS. Your illness does not however change how bad an idea this is. A Cybersecurity Advisory office is a good idea but it should be just that, something that provides advice, coordination and speaks with the private sector on ways to enhance our nation's cybersecurity with their help.
  • AustinRoth
    Jim -

    "Why, yes, AR, it probably is your ODS."

    LOL

    I wonder, with your BDS and my ODS, if we somehow ended up in the same room, would it be like matter and anti-matter colliding? And would the resultant particle creations and subsequent decays eventually coalesce into a true Moderate? :)

    But glad to see you, too, see this as a ominous new power grab, regardless of who is asking for it.
  • JD_Rhoades
    So you can't point to any evidence? Nothing in which Obama even expressed approval of this (bad) idea? Thought so.

    Now, can you explain why, if this is such an obvious power grab orchestrated by the eeeeevil Barack Hussein Obama, a Republican Senator would co-sponsor this bill?

    It's a bad idea. In fact, it's a terrible idea. But not every bad idea comes from Obama, no matter how all-powerful you paranoiac wingnuts would like to believe he is.
  • AustinRoth
    JD - True. Obama didn't think up child rape. Thanks for keeping me honest.
  • Rudi
    Thx AR Your ODS is >= to any BDS from the other side during the last eight years. Do you have ice cream fantasies about K-Lo at NRO?
  • Actually the Obama Administration and/or Congress is late to the game. Hackers can already shut down the 'Net. All the Feds/CIA/FBI/Illuminati/MJ-12/Mothershippers/Pecan Pie Lovers have to do is give them a ring, some cash, and the job is done. Heck with middleman. Go to the SOURCE!
  • And I have a cure for BDS and ODS: Spongebob Squarepants!

    OHHHHHHH!!
    Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?
    SpongeBob SquarePants!
    Absorbent and yellow and pourous is he!
    SpongeBob SquarePants!
    If nautical nonsense be something you wish,
    SpongeBob SquarePants!
    Then drop on the deck and flop like a fish!
    SpongeBob SquarePants!
    Ready?
    SpongeBob SquarePants, SpongeBob SquarePants,
    SpongeBob SquarePants!

    SpongeBob SquarePaaaaannttss!!!
    HA HA HA HA !!!!

    COURTESY OF VIACOM


    Works like a charm...
  • AustinRoth
    Rudi -

    Oh really?

    So, I guess I remember incorrectly all the speculation that Bush was going to declare martial law and refuse to give up the Presidency at the end of his term?

    Or those who seriously claimed that hurricane damage is controlled from the Bush White House and is routinely directed towards areas of lower income / high minority population?

    Or the 'truthers' that claim 9-11 was conducted as a Machiavellian plot by Bush/Cheney?

    Or that passed laws to have Bush arrested for war crimes and impeached in Vermont?

    Or claiming that Bernie Ward was only charged with possession of child pornography because he critisized Bush?

    Or made on-line games where to goal was to kill Bush, or the 'Kill Bush" products sold online?

    And so on?
  • Jim_Satterfield
    T-Steel is unfortunately correct. (Warning: Geek Speak Ahead) Look at what a mediocre DDOS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack on the DNS servers of Road Runner accomplished recently. Then there was another DDOS attack on a company called UltraDNS that affected performance for Amazon, Salesforce.com and petco.com. The harsh truth is that computer security for all is affected by individual computer security and knowledge, which is sadly lacking.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    Remember, AR, current theory holds that the matter that our universe consists of is probably only the fractional remainder of what existed at the very beginning of the universe. No one knows why it was matter that survived instead of antimatter or if it was more like a coin toss. So....would the condensate be possibly right-of-center or left-of-center? Or maybe a clone of Jon Stewart?
  • AustinRoth
    Jim -

    You are correct about cyber-security. The vast majority of users, especially here in the US, blissfully think that their Norton (or whatever) is keeping them safe. HA.

    My son's best friend works for the Air Force and with the NSA on some of their initiatives, and obviously I cannot go onto any kind of detail, but it is so much worse than even some of the supposedly shrillest voices say. We are WAY behind the Chinese, Japanese. Russians, Indians, etc.

    They see the US as either a testing ground for their 'simpler' stuff before they really go after hard targets (each other), or frankly just screw with our networks to send a message.
  • plethera
    This is supposed to be big news? Give me a break. We survived without the internet for many many years. This is very LOW on my list of worries, actually it's not even on my list.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC