Anti-War Vote in New Hampshire?

After all the demographic slicing and dicing, the final primary figures disclose one New Hampshire result pundits are ignoring: The only two candidates who unequivocally want to take us of out of Afghanistan and most of the Middle East muddle now, Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman, together received 39.8 percent of the vote to Mitt Romney’s 39.6 percent.

In contrast, Rick Perry, who advocates going back into Iraq, got one percent as superhawks Santorum and Gingrich drew single figures.

Granted, the contest was about the economy, but both Paul and Huntsman kept pointing out that trillions being wasted on nation-building in the Middle East, to say nothing of the continuing human toll, could be better spent back home rebuilding America.

In his victory lap, Mitt Romney, having it both ways as usual, promises jobs to veterans when they come home but avoids taking any position on bringing them back, settling for jingo clichés about American power.

In the GOP fantasy world of 2012, the horse race will go on, but won’t change, as a New York Times editorial points out:

”The candidates’ economic arguments were disturbingly disconnected from economic reality…”

MORE.

Author: ROBERT STEIN

1 Comment

  1. Romney’s “merit based society”, is the greatest hogwash ever dumped onto an unsuspecting public. If our nation’s capitalism equitably bestowed wealth upon it’s people according to, “merit”, those that physically worked the hardest would make the same as CEOs and there would be NO passing wealth down to your brats, because they then would have to achieve “merit” by their contribution, rather than their birth-right. Amazing concept; Social Darwinism extended to the rich instead of just the poor. Level the the playing field. I would go for that Mr. Conservative, how bout it?!

Submit a Comment