" />

The Moderate Voice

An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right


You are here: Home / Donald Trump / WAS DONALD TRUMP’S STATE OF THE UNION A POLITICAL VARIETY SHOW?

WAS DONALD TRUMP’S STATE OF THE UNION A POLITICAL VARIETY SHOW?

by Leave a Comment

Reaction to President Donald Trump’s record setting longest-in-history 2026 State of the Union address is coming in. Most reviews are decided negative. Many analysts believe the poll will do little to lift his sagging poll numbers. Several have said it was more of a political variety show than a State of the Union speech. One says it was so far off from what a State of the Union address should be that the speech should now be delivered in a way it was done a century ago: give it to Congress in writing.

The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols:

The longest State of the Union in modern history is now over. Donald Trump held court in the House of Representatives and said little of substance, but substance wasn’t the point. This year, he intended to put on a show, with an array of guest stars and special appearances. He was happy because he was playing the roles he clearly loves: game-show host, ringmaster, emcee, beneficent granter of wishes—and, where the Democrats were concerned, a self-righteous inquisitor.

…President Ronald Reagan, the “Great Communicator,” once managed to do the entire State of the Union address in 31 minutes; that’s because he could say important things efficiently and well. Tonight, however, was not about communication—it was about showmanship. Almost every line was a cue for applause from obedient Republicans; they even gave Jared Kushner a standing ovation. Every few minutes, Trump told a story and reached out into the audience like the host of The Price Is Right, telling people to come on down.

He started, of course, with the U.S. men’s Olympic hockey team. Just basking along with Team USA wasn’t enough. Trump soon announced that the goalie Connor Hellebuyck would receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Normally, this honor is bestowed for a lifetime of achievement, but this time it was given as if the young athlete had chosen the right door and found a new car.

…Trump even had designated heels in the audience: the Democrats. He called them crazy and accused them of impoverishing the nation. He dared them to stand up if they agreed with him that “the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.” This stunt was obviously meant to force Democrats either to stand or boo or otherwise do something that Trump could exploit; instead, it merely resulted in several awkward seconds of a staring contest between the president and the Democrats in the chamber. Trump managed to bait Representative Ilhan Omar into shouting at him, but for the most part, he seemed genuinely irritated that the Democrats sat through his show in stony silence.

As the whole business dragged on, the atmosphere started to seem less like a game show and more like the late-night Jerry Lewis telethons of the 1970s, in which a tired but pumped Lewis alternately griped at the audience, broke into maudlin emotion, or jumped up to welcome a new guest. The only thing Trump did not do was explain his policies—especially about war and peace—to Congress or the American people.

…But Trump tonight went far beyond what even the most self-indulgent presidents would have envisioned. Beset by scandal, facing multiple defeats in America’s courts, and hitting levels of unpopularity that would make President Richard Nixon nod with empathy, he turned the State of the Union into a vulgar, populist carnival.

Also in The Atlantic, David Frum, George W. Bush’s former speechwriter who coined the phrase “Axis of Evil,” argued that Trump’s speech is so far from what the founding fathers intended that it needs to be done in the future in writing to Congress.

President Trump’s State of the Union address last night was very like the man who delivered it: divisive, abusive, and childish.

The speech turned reality on its head in many ways. The president who has enriched himself and his family by more than a billion dollars in his first few months in office called on Congress to clean up its corruption. The president who has collected about $175 billion in illegal tariffs from the American people falsely told them that he had given them a great big tax cut. The president solemnly condemned political violence—the same president who ended his first term by inciting a mob to sack Congress and overturn an election. Maybe most shocking, Trump demanded that members of Congress rise to agree that it’s the first duty of government to protect American citizens—even as his own government by its brutal police methods has shot American citizens dead on the streets and then tried to deceive the country about how those Americans had been killed and why. Then of course there were the many misstatements of fact about the economy, about crime, and about wars and peace—many of which look like deliberate decisions to deceive the public watching on television.

…..But there comes a point when sad realities must be faced. The speech last night was empty and uselessly garrulous. Its length was its first declaration of disrespect for those obliged to sit through it. Trump’s name-calling of his predecessor and of the members of Congress in the chamber, his demands that legislators rise at his command, his strategic deployment of systematic untruth in service of those demands to rise and clap—put together, he misused the State of the Union ritual in ways so radical as to call the ritual itself into question. Are members of Congress really supposed to sit meekly and quietly while the president uses the rostrum of their chamber to abuse and insult them in the ugliest language? The president is present in Congress as a guest: That’s the reason for the famous language about the “high honor and distinct privilege” of welcoming him to speak. He has no right to be heard in person; it’s a courtesy.

And:

..Given the intentional abuse of Congress’s time and hospitality last night, the next speaker, if there is a different next speaker, should consider very hard whether to extend another such invitation. The case for suffering Trump is that the tradition, if interrupted, may take a long time to return. A future Republican Congress will requite the next Democratic president the same way. But there’s also a risk of setting a precedent that anti-institutional Republicans get to smash things, which pro-institutional Democrats must then clean up. Maybe the only way to restore norms is by imposing some meaningful costs for breaking them. Next January, the next speaker could do everyone a favor with a letter that begins: “Dear Mr. President, the time has come for your State of the Union message. Please send it in writing in the enclosed envelope. Congress will give it all the attention it deserves. This is the method that was good enough for Rutherford B. Hayes, and, Mr. Trump, it is more than good enough for you.”

Not everyone agreed that the speech was a bomb. Rupert Murdock’s New York Post editorial board hailed it as a “home run.”

President Trump hit it out of the park (again) with his 2026 State of the Union address, perhaps his most remarkable speech yet.

The event was an unabashed celebration of America in its 250th year, hailing heroes from the Olympic hockey champions to 100-year-old veterans — and with a close reiteration why the nation’s best days are yet to come.

He was the happy warrior we’d asked him to be, with a strong, clear message untainted by grievance — even as he expressed his disappointment with last week’s Supreme Court ruling on tariffs and drew clear distinctions between his program and the opposition’s.

He flagged the inflation, wage stagnation and other horrors produced when Democrats ran Washington as the causes of the “affordability” crisis.

He explained how Americans’ lives are getting better — rising wages, lower gas prices, fat tax rebates coming — and should keep improving.

Former Republican Congressman and CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger:

Last night’s State of the Union was, in a very real sense, exactly what we’ve come to expect: a theatrical exercise designed to please an already convinced audience, with almost no chance of moving any voters who aren’t already in the base. In a political moment where the bar is so low that short of convulsing in a pile of his own filth Trump would get a pass, this performance hit the baseline and nothing more.

President Trump took nearly an hour and 48 minutes — the longest address to a joint session of Congress in history — to do what he’s done before: make grandiose claims about the economy, celebrate culture-war victories, and castigate Democrats as enemies of the people. But here’s the blunt truth: it won’t change any minds outside his core supporters. The rest of the country, by most polls, remains skeptical about his handling of inflation, costs, and everyday life.

That’s not an accident. Last night wasn’t aimed at persuading moderates or independents — it was a pep rally. The crowded applause lines, the symbolic gestures, the heavy reliance on feel-good moments with the U.S. men’s Olympic hockey champions, and the awards handed out in the chamber all served the same purpose: galvanize the base and create optics.

Here’s where we land: last night doesn’t move the needle in any decisive way. It won’t flip swing voters. It won’t magically solve the discontent voters feel walking through Costco or filling up at the pump. It won’t erase the fact that Democrats’ midterm prospects still look stronger than they have in years, and it won’t dramatically alter the trajectory toward what many are calling a blue wave this November.

In short: last night accomplished its limited objectives — and no more than that.

Meanwhile, in the platform formerly known as Twitter: