Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on May 12, 2011 in Politics, War | 8 comments

Ron Paul Never Would Have Approved Raid That Led to bin Laden’s Killing

Here’s yet another reason why Ron Paul may appeal intellectually to many Republicans and Tea Party members but he never could be elected President of the United States:

Ron Paul says he would not have authorized the mission that led to the death of Osama bin Laden, and that President Barack Obama should have worked with the Pakistani government instead of authorizing a raid.

“I think things could have been done somewhat differently,” Paul said this week. “I would suggest the way they got Khalid [Sheikh] Mohammed. We went and cooperated with Pakistan. They arrested him, actually, and turned him over to us, and he’s been in prison. Why can’t we work with the government?”

Asked by WHO Radio’s Simon Conway whether he would have given the go-ahead to kill bin Laden if it meant entering another country, Paul shot back that it “absolutely was not necessary.

It’s refreshing to hear a politician be so honest. But no matter how this would be finessed, any candidate in an election who took this position would be THIS.

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com