A bit of post-execution malaise
We’d been anticipating Saddam Hussein’s execution all day, but when the news finally came last night, I was a bit surprised at my lack of reaction. As I wrote this morning — it seems so irrelevant somehow.
Share This
We’d been anticipating Saddam Hussein’s execution all day, but when the news finally came last night, I was a bit surprised at my lack of reaction. As I wrote this morning — it seems so irrelevant somehow.
If you were a US soldier in Iraq, you might not think this was so irrelevant.
Why? What has changed for them?
Polimom–
Quoting your co-blogger, Marc Schulman:
Emphasis added!
Schulman link HERE.
BYG — there’s been a lot of speculation on whether a spike might be fueled.
FWIW — I don’t know whether you read Stratfor, but for pure analysis, I find them to be extremely good. They came out with a comprehensive analysis last night, which included this:
(link here, by subscription) They don’t rule out short-term consequences, either. Ultimately, though, Saddam’s support is seen as quite low — contrary to what we’ve been reading in the MSM.
Our soldiers are already in profound danger every minute of every day. If Saddam’s execution does cause a spike in violence (and I hope it doesn’t), I think it’s a matter of relativity.
Thus I asked — what’s changed? Are they suddenly vigilent, when before they were not?
A matter of relativity?
Thank you for the clarification.