• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Mission Statement
  • Commenter Rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Account Access
The Moderate Voice

The Moderate Voice

An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Media
  • Inspiration and Living
  • Economy
  • International
  • Movie Reviews

NO, Not About the Golden Half…

NO, Not About the Golden Half…

Posted on February 27, 2021
How New York’s 19th-century Jews turned Purim into an American party

How New York’s 19th-century Jews turned Purim into an American party

Posted on February 27, 2021
US says Saudi prince approved Khashoggi murder but spares him sanctions

US says Saudi prince approved Khashoggi murder but spares him sanctions

Posted on February 27, 2021
U.S. House approves Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 aid

U.S. House approves Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 aid

Posted on February 27, 2021
I Dont Know, What Do You Think: Separated at Birth? or an Artist who Hates Trump, or What?

I Dont Know, What Do You Think: Separated at Birth? or an Artist who Hates Trump, or What?

Posted on February 27, 2021
Get out the world’s smallest playable violin for the wealthiest Americans.

Get out the world’s smallest playable violin for the wealthiest Americans.

Posted on February 25, 2021
Republican leaders want a show of unity. Will Trump allow it?

Republican leaders want a show of unity. Will Trump allow it?

Posted on February 25, 2021
Unity

Unity

Posted on February 24, 2021
New People, New Parties, New Infrastructure

New People, New Parties, New Infrastructure

Posted on February 24, 2021
Car crash is the latest test of Tiger Woods resilience

Car crash is the latest test of Tiger Woods resilience

Posted on February 23, 2021
Ted Cruz as Archie Bunker

Ted Cruz as Archie Bunker

Posted on February 23, 2021
Biden’s first month was a ‘honeymoon,’ but bigger challenges loom ahead

Biden’s first month was a ‘honeymoon,’ but bigger challenges loom ahead

Posted on February 23, 2021
Perhaps Stormy Daniels wants to be a loser.

Perhaps Stormy Daniels wants to be a loser.

Posted on February 23, 2021
Biden AG Nominee Merrick Garland calls extremism his ‘first priority’

Biden AG Nominee Merrick Garland calls extremism his ‘first priority’

Posted on February 23, 2021
Bells toll for lives lost as U.S. reaches 500,000 COVID deaths

Bells toll for lives lost as U.S. reaches 500,000 COVID deaths

Posted on February 22, 2021
Conservatives should go after Big Media next.

Conservatives should go after Big Media next.

Posted on February 22, 2021
You are here: Home / Featured / 46,218 news transcripts show ideologically extreme politicians get more airtime

46,218 news transcripts show ideologically extreme politicians get more airtime

February 16, 2021 by Guest Voice Leave a Comment


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks to the press after the House voted to remove her from committee assignments.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Joshua P. Darr, Louisiana State University ; Jeremy Padgett, University of Mobile, and Johanna Dunaway, Texas A&M University

Committee assignments are normally a blessing for new House members. But some of today’s newer members, like freshmen Republican representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Madison Cawthorn, seem to be more interested in punditry than policy.

When Greene was stripped of her committee assignments on Feb. 4 for a series of past statements that included threats directed against her Democratic colleagues, she replied by tweeting that she woke up “literally laughing” that “a bunch of morons” had given her “free time” to promote her views in the media.

Meanwhile, Cawthorn, in a recent email to colleagues, noted that he built his staff “around comms [communications] rather than legislation.”

We research how changes in the media have shifted the incentives of elected officials and the considerations of voters, and what that means for American democracy.

In recent work, we showed that extremely conservative and extremely liberal legislators receive far more airtime on cable and broadcast news than their moderate counterparts.

Robust local news outlets once held legislators to account by covering whether they delivered for their districts. But as local news has declined, voters are turning to national media outlets for their political news. There, ideological outliers now set the tone of the debate, distorting perceptions of the important issues and warping Americans’ views of their political options.

Communications become currency

Committees give representatives power and influence on issues that matter to their district. A seat on a committee can help a representative claim credit for legislation and raise money.

Serving on powerful and relevant committees pays dividends for new legislators, who are under pressure to produce before they face reelection in less than two years. New members are called backbenchers for a reason, however. They step into a system where experience is currency, and they are flat broke. Spots on committees are doled out by party leadership based on seniority and loyalty.

Fifty years ago, newcomers were totally out of luck. The House was controlled by older, entrenched committee chairs who were even more powerful than elected leadership.

But after the 1974 election swept in 93 new members, these backbenchers – dubbed “Watergate Babies,” since they were elected in the wake of President Nixon’s resignation – pushed for reforms that opened up committee membership and allowed television coverage of committee hearings and the House floor. In the following years, politicians like Newt Gingrich took advantage of this opportunity to reach prime-time audiences and raise their profiles through combative floor speeches.

A congressman on the House floor is shown through the lens of a camera.
Democratic Rep. Joe Neguse is seen through a television camera viewfinder as he delivers an opening statement during a committee hearing.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Communications staffs expanded as earning coverage and shaping debate through the media rather than in committee meetings became the norm.

The tactics that make good television are very different from those for succeeding in the committee system. Breaking from the party line is punished when committees are the way to get ahead and party leaders control the assignments.

But this same divergence from the party line is rewarded when media exposure becomes a valuable currency: Sticking out from the crowd can elicit attention from media outlets seeking to highlight controversy in order to attract viewers.

Then there’s social media, which allows politicians to bypass reporters and editors. Rather than merely hoping reporters publish their quotes, representatives can tweet and post whatever they like, reaching large audiences of supporters and donors.

Instead of shaping policy that would help them locally, politicians focus on burnishing their national profiles, either through winning coverage on national cable and broadcast news or by boosting their social media followings.

Extreme members reap the rewards

Today’s new House members understand that media coverage will help them achieve their goals, and that expressing extreme ideas is one way to earn it.

Our research shows that ideologically extreme members of Congress get to speak more often than moderates on both cable and broadcast networks.

Using a common ideological measure called DW-NOMINATE, we compared the ideologies of all House members with those featured on cable networks Fox News, CNN and MSNBC, and broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC. We studied 46,218 transcripts from 2005 to 2013 to find when representatives spoke on air.

We found that the House that’s shown on the news is much more ideologically extreme than the actual House. When we divided representatives into five equal groups by ideology, we found that the most extreme groups on each end of the political spectrum were most often given airtime.

This effect is strongest for conservatives on the far right end of the spectrum, though both ideological poles are heard from more often on national cable and broadcast television than moderates. Cable networks were more likely than broadcast to feature extreme legislators, but overall, pushing the boundaries meant more coverage across television networks.

On television news, conflict and drama sell

Since news companies primarily seek to attract viewers and boost ad revenue, the conflict and drama stoked by extreme legislators make them a natural fit for this business model.

While it may help the bottom lines of TV networks, it doesn’t help democracy.

Studies have shown that the public already sees politics as more polarized than it is, and that media coverage of political conflict and polarization can deepen those perceptions. TV networks and social media algorithms, by amplifying the extremes, are likely driving the American public further apart.

Broader trends in the media – namely, the demise of local news – are making this dynamic worse. Both local television and newspapers are declining fast, but local newspapers supply most of the stories that local TV reports on. The entire local news ecosystem is suffering: Local newsrooms have shed half their employees since 2008.

[Understand what’s going on in Washington. Sign up for The Conversation’s Politics Weekly.]

Local news outlets are much more likely to report on the benefits and services legislators bring back to their districts. When local news is strong, government is more responsive, local elections are more competitive and local government finances even improve. On the other hand, where local news is weaker, there is more corruption and polarization.

When legislators respond to local news incentives instead of national ones, their constituents benefit. As local news declines, they have less reason to do so.

Any solution would require national TV news to change. Networks could feature a range of views instead of flocking to the extremes, include more perspectives from local journalists or spotlight compromises as well as disagreements, all of which would help reverse these dynamics.

For now, freshmen stepping into the House think that their path forward is paved with national media coverage.

In many ways, they’re not wrong.The Conversation

Joshua P. Darr, Assistant Professor of Political Communication, Louisiana State University ; Jeremy Padgett, Assistant Professor of Communication, University of Mobile, and Johanna Dunaway, Associate Professor of Communication, Texas A&M University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Filed Under: Extremists, Featured, Journalism, Media, Politics, Social Media Tagged With: Cable News, Congress, House of Representatives, legislation, Media, Political communication, social media

Primary Sidebar

Donate to TMV

The TMV Feed

 Subscribe in a reader

Archives

Categories

The Latest

Most Commented Posts (7 or so days)

Copyright 1998 - 2020 The Moderate Voice. Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in