Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Mar 5, 2010 in Politics | 15 comments

Down with the Man

David Brooks considers what today’s “Tea Party” has in common with the “New Left” of the late 1960s.

… the Tea Partiers have adopted the tactics of the New Left. They go in for street theater, mass rallies, marches and extreme statements that are designed to shock polite society out of its stupor. This mimicry is no accident. Dick Armey, one of the spokesmen for the Tea Party movement, recently praised the methods of Saul Alinsky, the leading tactician of the New Left …

But the core commonality is this: Members of both movements believe in what you might call mass innocence. Both movements are built on the assumption that the people are pure and virtuous and that evil is introduced into society by corrupt elites and rotten authority structures.

But it is the following excerpt, later in Brooks’ column, that is perhaps the most damning of the Tea Partiers who believe their cause is “conservative.” It’s most certainly not, Brooks argues.

… both the New Left and the Tea Party movement are radically anticonservative. Conservatism is built on the idea of original sin — on the assumption of human fallibility and uncertainty. To remedy our fallen condition, conservatives believe in civilization — in social structures, permanent institutions and just authorities, which embody the accumulated wisdom of the ages and structure individual longings.