Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jan 30, 2007 in Health, Politics | 5 comments

Bush Moves Puts Political Gatekeepers In Charge Of Agencies

This question again, to Republicans: Is this REALLY what you had in mind for your party to do?

President Bush has signed a directive that gives the White House much greater control over the rules and policy statements that the government develops to protect public health, safety, the environment, civil rights and privacy.

In an executive order published last week in the Federal Register, Mr. Bush said that each agency must have a regulatory policy office run by a political appointee, to supervise the development of rules and documents providing guidance to regulated industries. The White House will thus have a gatekeeper in each agency to analyze the costs and the benefits of new rules and to make sure the agencies carry out the president’s priorities.

This strengthens the hand of the White House in shaping rules that have, in the past, often been generated by civil servants and scientific experts. It suggests that the administration still has ways to exert its power after the takeover of Congress by the Democrats.

The real tug of war going on entails an executive branch that is trying to use every legalistic tool it can to reshape the constitution of the United States so that Congress can be effectively neutered. In Bush’s first term, he didn’t have to do this since the GOP led Congress largely passed on aggressive oversight. It continues to boggle the mind that Republicans who were once so ferciously protective of how the United States was set up can remain silent with what has now become a pattern with the Bush administration.

Civil servants and scientific experts have had a role in successive governments for a reason.

The White House said the executive order was not meant to rein in any one agency. But business executives and consumer advocates said the administration was particularly concerned about rules and guidance issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

In an interview on Monday, Jeffrey A. Rosen, general counsel at the White House Office of Management and Budget, said, “This is a classic good-government measure that will make federal agencies more open and accountable.�

“Classic?” Good spin and it’s notable that it’s coming from a lawyer. MORE:

Business groups welcomed the executive order, saying it had the potential to reduce what they saw as the burden of federal regulations. This burden is of great concern to many groups, including small businesses, that have given strong political and financial backing to Mr. Bush.

Consumer, labor and environmental groups denounced the executive order, saying it gave too much control to the White House and would hinder agencies’ efforts to protect the public.

Typically, agencies issue regulations under authority granted to them in laws enacted by Congress. In many cases, the statute does not say precisely what agencies should do, giving them considerable latitude in interpreting the law and developing regulations.

The directive issued by Mr. Bush says that, in deciding whether to issue regulations, federal agencies must identify “the specific market failure� or problem that justifies government intervention.

Besides placing political appointees in charge of rule making, Mr. Bush said agencies must give the White House an opportunity to review “any significant guidance documents� before they are issued.

I.E. if it doesn’t fit the message of the day or the stand of the adminsitration, it’s sounds as if it’ll be unlikely to be released.