Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Nov 16, 2009 in At TMV, Breaking News, Economy, Health, Politics | 5 comments

What Big Pharma And Mexican Drug Cartels Share

The murderous Mexican drug cartels are known for their viciousness conducting their illicit trade. U.S. drug manufactures are less sanguine but equally adept at protecting their profits.

In anticipation of new health reform legislation that would curb their oligarchy, drug makers have raised their prices about 9% this past year while the Consumer Price Index has fallen by 1.3% during the same period.

The widely acclaimed deal the industry struck with the White House and Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus to shave $80 billion in prices over the next 10 years looks as if someone got snookered. It wasn’t Big Pharma.

The industry’s rapid price increases on brand names protected by patents are fairly chronicled and explained in an article in today’s New York Times.

What the article fails to mention is that an amendment to the senate committee’s bill was defeated that would have allowed Medicare to purchase drugs for low-income seniors at the same price that Medicaid pays for the drugs. The Congressional Budget Office estimated it would result in a loss of $106 billion over 10 years to drug makers. That tells you who has the upper hand in this process. It isn’t the consumer. The House bill hopes to cut drug prices by $140 billion over the next decade.

The thrust of the price increases is to protect profits required for research and development of new drugs, the Times story quotes industry spokespersons. One of them, Ken Johnson, senior vice president of the industry association β€” the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America β€” argued medicines create health savings.

“Medicines often reduce unnecessary hospitalization, help avoid costly medical procedures and increase productivity through better prevention and management of chronic diseases,” he said.

Artificially inflating prices is nothing new for Big Pharma. Reports The Times:

A Harvard health economist, Joseph P. Newhouse, said he found a similar pattern of unusual price increases after Congress added drug benefits to Medicare a few years ago, giving tens of millions of older Americans federally subsidized drug insurance. Just as the program was taking effect in 2006, the drug industry raised prices by the widest margin in a half-dozen years.

Don’t you love our free market sources at work? It’s more civilized than the Mexican drug lords. After all, we consumers are mere peons.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2009 The Moderate Voice
  • DLS

    Don’t overreact, and don’t subscribe to the myth that the People! [tm] have the right to expropriate or be dictatorial over the drug companies (under a muscular monopsonistic scenario).

    If the companies really are doing a quick zoom climb with their prices before “reform,” it’s bad PR. They have legitimate gripes, as do the insurers, but as with the insurers, bad timing and abruptness is poor PR.

  • Wannabe_Centrist

    “It’s more civilized than the Mexican drug lords.”

    Not really. Mexican drug lords are not going and killing drug users (their consumers) in America where-as Big Pharma has absolutely no problem with poorer Americans dying due to insanely priced medicines. Living not too far from the border with Mexico, I have little fear of the drug lords (they leave people alone when they mind their own business) but I certainly fear the prospect of these greedy SOB’s giving America and capitalism a bad name should reform not occur. I want them to lose BILLIONS and I eventually want those BILLIONS go to our government, which is already strapped for cash (ditto for health insurance). Only fitting after screwing the common man for decades, is it not? BTW, there are still waves of American seniors going to Mexico to get cheaper meds despite the violence that is currently occurring there, just check out any border crossing.

  • Silhouette

    Well they have to recoup their bribe money somehow. So they pass that expense on to their customers 9%. These are the same customers who will find themselves and their neighbors in more and more dire circumstances should Bigpharma’s pocket-men succeed in defeating reform.

    Ironic. Should be more than ironic. Should be illegal.

  • ProfElwood

    The real irony is that both groups are able to make their profits because of federal laws. By the way, how can people call a government restricted market, a free market? Is it really that hard to understand the difference?

  • DLS

    “By the way, how can people call a government restricted market, a free market?”

    Dishonestly, is the answer. Why? The ends justify the means. What do they want, instead? More government restriction, or government replacement of the private sector, in this case.

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com