Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Oct 25, 2013 in Business, International, Law, Media, Politics, Science & Technology, Society | 5 comments

U.S. Spying? Don’t Put Your Open Data in the Town Square! (Trouw, The Netherlands)


With much of the world in a state of outrage and/or panic over NSA spying, Dutch privacy and security researcher Guido Van ‘t Noordende has a handy solution. For Trouw of the Netherlands, Van ‘t Noordende wonders why anyone would expect security, when data, in cyber terms, is just sitting in plain sight. He suggests not using the ‘cloud’ to store unencrypted data, ever, particularly with firms that are either American owned or based in the United States.

For Trouw, at the expense of America’s Internet giants, Guido Van ‘t Noordende offers a dash of Dutch common sense:

The bugging by U.S. spy agency NSA has led to disbelief and outrage in Brussels, but also in The Hague. In the Netherlands alone, 1.8 million telephone calls were tapped. But we make it so easy for the Americans. We conveniently forget that we’re the ones putting all of our business information in unlocked safes in the middle of the town square or the Dam [in Amsterdam]. And then we’re surprised that thieves and secret services are poking around!

While the opposition party in The Hague calls for debate, big companies advertise data storage in “the cloud.” Whether this storage is adequately protected isn’t specified – and eavesdropping isn’t even mentioned. The cloud consists mainly of data centers where companies can store information. Some of those data centers are located in the United States, are American properties, and often make use of American software. That’s a problem. For all U.S. software must meet U.S. anti-terrorism legislation and allow for the handy retrieval of data. Any unencrypted information in the cloud or sent over the Internet may be intercepted – not only by the U.S., but also the British, Chinese, or our own intelligence services.

The question is why the architecture of systems have been designed in such a way that this can happen. Why don’t the government and companies choose a system in which eavesdropping is prevented? Or systems in which overcoming security is so difficult that it would only happen when absolutely necessary? Solutions are known. Information must be encrypted. Only the sender and receiver therefore have the keys to decrypt the data. Third parties, including the cloud administrator, have no access. As long as sender and receiver abide by the rules, this is how to keep the intelligence services out.

READ ON IN ENGLISH OR DUTCH, OR READ MORE TRANSLATED and English-language foreign press coverage as the NSA surveillance scandal continues to unfold at Worldmeets.US, your most trusted translator and aggregator of foreign news and views about our nation.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The Moderate Voice
  • sheknows

    No one here in the U.S. cares about spying anymore. That’s sooo 3 months ago. Americans had fun slamming Snowden or feigning outrage, but they really didn’t care. Other countries care of course. They don’t have the political circus we do to keep them entertained and blanket them with a soothing White House ” we need to have this conversation”.( like never…) Truth is, most Americans don’t care if their privacy is violated.
    That being said, the Dutch are finally getting the hang of it and will be securing everything. That means that so will the rest of Europe. The NSA may be above our own government, but that’s because we allow it. It doesn’t mean the rest of the world has to act like fools.

  • Rambie

    SK, I think it’s most think, “I’m not important enough to spy on.” Without realizing how easy it is TO spy on anyone in cyperspace.

  • Chickenfarmer

    What people forget is that their data is subject to hacking. In addition, as was pointed out on this site a few days ago, NSA is now sharing this information with other agencies (TSA, DEA). The TSA is using algorithms to determine who to gets enhanced screening. Go to websites that fit a profile and find yourself getting a complete going over at the airport. This is a very unpleasant process. They can’t send us to jail based on profiles but they can make our lives more complicated, difficult, and unpleasant. This is why we need to start caring about privacy.

  • sheknows

    I guess that explains why friends and acquaintances of Assange practically get strip searched when they travel. I wondered how airport people would know to detain his friends ( how do they even know who these people are?) and keep them for hours.

  • Rambie


    It is scary to think how much data they’re keeping on everyone and how many fingers have access.

    Let your horny nephew use your computer one night and suddenly you’re on some list for extra screening whenever you fly. (not saying that’s how it works, but it’s not a comfortable thought)

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :