Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jul 12, 2015 in At TMV, History, Race | 8 comments

North Carolina: This Time Not About a ‘Symbol’

Some have called the recent debate about and the eventual taking down of the Confederate battle flag at the South Carolina State House “the ungodliness of trepidation” and claim that the flag is not a symbol of hate and institutional racism.

Others have called that flag and other Confederacy relics just “symbols” and call the fury — “hate” — over them a distraction that results in not doing something concrete about real racism and bigotry.

In a recent column, however, Eugene Robinson writes that “symbols matter,” and that the Confederate flag is an important symbol “because of the way it has been used — not just as an instrument of repression but as a way to deny history and thus avoid history’s judgments and responsibilities.” He adds, “What South Carolina’s governor and Legislature have announced is clear: It’s time, finally, to stop pretending.”

Whatever history may eventually say about this momentous event in South Carolina, North Carolina is tackling not a flag, not a symbol of slavery and discrimination, but the state’s alleged real discrimination against black voters.

The New York Times:

A federal trial opening in Winston-Salem on Monday is meant to determine whether recent, sweeping changes in the state’s election laws discriminate against black voters. These changes were adopted by the Republican-dominated state legislature in 2013, immediately after the United States Supreme Court struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 when it ended a requirement that nine states with histories of discrimination, including North Carolina, get federal approval before altering their election laws.

The Times writes that the contested measures “include reduced early voting days, an end to same-day registration and an end to a program to preregister high school students.” While a “far cry from the violent intimidation and poll taxes of the Jim Crow era,” the Times adds. “few issues are more highly charged than voting rights in the old Confederate states, where the murder of civil rights workers and the brutal police attack on Alabama marchers galvanized Congress to pass the 1965 act, and the trial is fanning old emotions.”

Read more here about a case that is not about symbols, but about real people trying to exercise their Constitutional rights, not in the Confederacy, not in the 19th century, but in the United States of America in the Year of Our Lord 2015.

A case that, according to the Times, could have far wider repercussions, “helping to define the scope of voting rights protections across the country in the coming presidential election and beyond.”

Lead image:

Follow Dorian de Wind on Twitter:

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 The Moderate Voice
  • The_Ohioan

    Good start Dorian. And you started on the most important problem if we are to continue as a representative democracy.

    • DdW

      Since we had some differences on the “flag issue,” your concurrence on the importance of the voting issue to our democracy means a lot to me, T.O.

      Thank you!

      • The_Ohioan

        Oh, we agree on most things, Dorian. Though we don’t agree on every thing, we should at least try to approach a subject with a realistic view which I think we both usually do.

        My concern about the “flag issue” has started to intrude on our reality as I feared. Who knows where it will end.

        • DdW

          Cute piece of satire by young Patrick Hogan which hopefully will not evolve into “Life imitating satire.”

          Yes, I believe we are generally on the same page, albeit sometimes using slightly different lenses to read it. 🙂

          • The_Ohioan

            I guess we’re using different lenses on this one, too. I got the link from a Daily Kos piece, and it sure didn’t sound like the author thought it was satire. Maybe she and I got snarked!


            P.S. It sounds like the commenters on the piece got taken, too.

            Edit to add:


            We’d better leave all this for another thread. 🙂

          • DdW

            I went to the link in your comment:


            which is young Patrick Hogan’s Fusion satire piece. ???

          • The_Ohioan

            The Patrick Hogan’s fusion piece is not a satire piece as far as I can tell. I’m saying that because I got that fusion link from the author at Daily Kos who seemed to think it fit in with her dismay about other Confederate monuments.

            Are you saying the fusion Patrick Hogan piece is satire? Now I’m confused.

          • DdW

            In addition to the opening paragraph appearing to wanting to take a look at the University of South Carolina (for “taking down” I assume) …

            Once the flag is down, maybe the state can take a look at the University of South Carolina—specifically, the Wade Hampton residence hall. The building is named after a former Civil War general, governor, and senator, whose Red Shirts supporters terrorized black South Carolinians to keep them from voting.”

            …seeing that is a “Pop culture satire irreverent news” site made me think the piece
            was satirical

            If not, no big deal.

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :