New Lie Detector Will End Need For Voluntary Lie Detector Tests
The Department of Defense is going to try to develop a new lie detector that could prove useful in military and other operations — but could mean then end of a lot of political careers if members of the public ever get ahold of it:
THE US Department of Defense has revealed plans to develop a lie detector that can be used without the subject knowing they are being assessed. The Remote Personnel Assessment (RPA) device will also be used to pinpoint fighters hiding in a combat zone, or even to spot signs of stress that might mark someone out as a terrorist or suicide bomber.
In a call for proposals on a DoD website, contractors are being given until 13 January to suggest ways to develop the RPA, which will use microwave or laser beams reflected off a subject’s skin to assess various physiological parameters without the need for wires or skin contacts. The device will train a beam on “moving and non-cooperative subjects”, the DoD proposal says, and use the reflected signal to calculate their pulse, respiration rate and changes in electrical conductance, known as the “galvanic skin response”. “Active combatants will in general have heart, respiratory and galvanic skin responses that are outside the norm,” the website says.
Just imagine how this could be used in the field. Or how members of an audience watching a debate in Congress, a Presidential campaign debate or a Presidential policy statement could use it to monitor the accuracy of verbiage:
If the RPA is ever produced, it is likely to prove controversial. A remote lie detector would face even more difficulties than standard polygraph tests, which were themselves the subject of a damning 2003 report from the US National Academy of Sciences. “There is no way a polygraph test can be carried out usefully without the subject knowing, because you actually want the person to worry about certain questions,” says Bruce Burgess, an examiner with polygraph firm Distress Services of Leatherhead, Surrey, UK.
But Steve Wright, a conflict analyst at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, raises the prospect of people identified as suspects by the device being captured and subjected to secret “prisoner rendition” as a result. And he warns that the RPA could introduce a “chill factor” into everyday life.
What? Suggesting a government would ever take advantage of this and push the envelope? What government would ever do that?