Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jun 22, 2016 in Government, Terrorism | 2 comments

Lynch : Fight Terrorism With Love

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch has put her foot in her mouth.

Here is an excerpt from a Reuters story:

“Let me say to our LGBT friends and family … this Department of Justice, and your country, stands with you in the light,” Lynch told a news conference. “We stand with you to say that the good in the world far outweighs the evil; that our common humanity transcends our differences; and that our most effective response to terror and hatred is compassion, unity and love.”

Here is a video clip from CNN’s coverage of the Attorney General’s speech.

Sure, if we loved terrorists more, then they will stop being so mean.


Is the Attorney General really that naïve?

In response to what Lynch said, conservative commentator Michelle Malkin tweeted, “Kumbaya counterterrorism! The head-choppers & suicide bombers are trembling in their jihad boot camps.”

When asked to respond to what Lynch said, libertarian political commentator Greg Gutfeld replied, “Love and compassion is one response, but it is not the best response. The best response is love and compassion combined with moral aggression.”

Gutfeld is correct. Terrorists will not stop being terrorists if we love them more. Terrorists will stop being terrorists when they are stopped by overwhelming physical force.

The Attorney General’s blunder comes on the heels of her initial decision to release an edited version of Omar Mateen’s 911 call in order to delete Mateen’s references to the Islamic State.

From CNN:

“The FBI on Monday afternoon released a full transcript of the 911 call Orlando Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Mateen made during his June 12 rampage inside the club, following pressure from news organizations and public officials.

The Islamic State, also known as ISIS, or its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, were not mentioned in a partial transcript of the call the FBI released Monday morning. The agency said it didn’t want to provide a platform to a terror group.

Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan was among the critics of the omissions, and the agency released the full, unredacted transcript of the call in the afternoon.”

One does not have to be a libertarian, a conservative or a Republican to figure out that the current U.S. Attorney General has made the Obama Administration look like it is soft on terrorism.

Loretta Lynch (official government photo)

Loretta Lynch
(official government photo)

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 The Moderate Voice
  • dduck

    Puhleez. Lynch’s statement is OK and you guys are twisting it. We love the not-Islamic terrorists to death with drones an explosives, not to mention special ops troops.
    I didn’t like her predecessor, but I like her so far.
    The blunder is on the part of the people of a same opinion as the writer.

  • If we, as a nation, showed more love, compassion and caring about all the rest of the people of the world (we show a lot already, but we could DEFINITELY show more), we might not have any terrorists attempting to attack us.

    About 10 or 12 years back, a group of computer scientists invented a computer that could be charged by using a foot compressor. It could be hooked up to the internet via towers that could be built in strategic locations. The total cost to provide EVERY SINGLE CHILD IN THE ENTIRE WORLD with one would have been about $100 (including the internet infrastructure).

    UNICEF estimates 2.2 billion children. That would be $220 billion. That is a small fraction of the amount we are spending on military. The good will that we would be likely to receive from such a gesture is likely to be worth far more than $220 billion. We could even put software on the computers that would screen out jihadi stupidity etc.

    That would be showing love for our fellow human beings on this planet; could be done economically; could have been part of the stimulus bill that we had back in 2009; would likely have helped create jobs for those from the middle class who lost them; and would have a FAR, FAR greater chance of reducing terrorism against the US than buying a few more high-tech bombers and aircraft carriers.

    Just sayin’

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :