How many times has the current administration stated that if we leave Iraq too soon, the “enemy�, the “jihadists�, will follow us here? To these United States. Our communities. Our shopping malls. Our movie theatres? Better to fight them there than to fight them here, goes the logic.
McClatchy Newspapers addresses the issue here:
It’s become President Bush’s mantra, his main explanation for why he won’t withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq anytime soon.
In speech after speech, in statement after statement, Bush insists that “this is a war in which, if we were to leave before the job is done, the enemy would follow us here.�
The line, which Bush repeated Wednesday in a speech to troops at California’s Fort Irwin, suggests a chilling picture of warfare on American streets.
But is it true?
Military and diplomatic analysts say it isn’t. They accuse Bush of exaggerating the threat that enemy forces in Iraq pose to the U.S. mainland.
“The president is using a primitive, inarticulate argument that leaves him open to criticism and caricature,â€? said James Jay Carafano, a homeland security and counterterrorism expert for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative policy organization. “It’s a poor choice of words that doesn’t convey the essence of the problem – that walking away from a problem doesn’t solve anything.â€?
U.S. military, intelligence and diplomatic experts in Bush’s own government say the violence in Iraq is primarily a struggle for power between Shiite and Sunni Muslim Iraqis seeking to dominate their society, not a crusade by radical Sunni jihadists bent on carrying the battle to the United States.
It’s hard to believe anyone would fall for this logic. Perhaps now is the time to sell that bridge I’ve always wanted to unload.
More News and Commentary for Moderates
�’Moderate’ is not a 4-letter word.�