An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama not done with Afghanistan decision

Apparently rumors of the death of President Obama’s decision making process on the route forward in Afghanistan were somewhat exaggerated. This from White House National Security Adviser Retired Gen. Jim Jones:

“Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false,” Jones, who generally keeps a low public profile, said in a prepared statement Monday night. “He has not received final options for his consideration, he has not reviewed those options with his national security team, and he has not made any decisions about resources. Any reports to the contrary are completely untrue and come from uninformed sources.”

There’s good news and bad news here. The good news is that, hopefully, we’re not going to hear some flat statement coming from the White House saying that the President has settled on some “compromise option.” The bad news is that we still might. Rumors were swirling that Obama was going to send “some” additional troops over, less than the amount being requested, but far more than we have currently, and with no mention of any clarification of what our overall mission is.

I still hold out hope that the President will come out and speak to the country, (and I’d probably even tune in to a prime time interruption for this one) letting us know the results of his review and exactly what he plans on achieving over there. And if his decision is to press forward for a solid, definable reason, then he should supply at least as many troops as our generals need, if not considerably more. PROVIDED he also lets us know how we will know when the mission is done and how he plans to get us out when those goals are achieved.

If he hasn’t done the work to be able to provide us with coherent answers to those questions, then I expect to hear him tell us that we’re getting out. Anything in between those two responsible choices will have me in the rare situation of being in agreement with Dick Cheney and saying that he’s “dithering” with the lives of our troops.

I’ll give you some more time to work this puzzle out, Mr. President, but we need some solid answers on this and time is ticking away.

  • DaGoat
    Good to have Obama's steady hand at the helm on this. Steady as in well, catatonic.

    McChrystal's recommendations went to the SOD on August 30th. How much longer do we give these guys?
  • DLS
    "McChrystal's recommendations went to the SOD on August 30th. How much longer do we give these guys?"

    Is it, with ObamaCo and some lib Congre-Dems, a matter of sufficient rationalization for their position?

    Their media auxiliaries include CNN (Clearly Not Neutral), who just coincidentally chose to put on the air a critic of the military's handling of the Pat Tillman incident, whose work about this and who was on the air, on NPR, weeks ago. Weeks ago. Why was he resurrected and put on the air once again, with an emphasis in doing so to attack McChrystal in particular (a systematized ad hominem argument form, in opposition to sending more troops to, and doing more in, Afghanistan)? What interesting as well as such coincidental timing and opportunism, I noticed.
  • redbus
    DLS, your post reminds me of the proverb: "Before you drown your dog, you say it has fleas." What you say is plausible. I wonder whether Obama has the stomach for the fight. His timing right not would not be good, in-light of the Fort Hood shootings. People are angry (whether rightly or wrongly) that fourteen are dead, and apparently, at least in-part, because of a Muslim extremist in our ranks.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC