An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

WHY ARE AMERICANS OBSESSED WITH THE FEMALE NIPPLE?

Perhaps living and studying in Europe on a number of occasions changed my perspective, but I cannot understand the silly outrage that many Americans show when some female displays her nipples, or other parts of her anatomy that are supposed to be off-limits. Contrarily the displays of male genitalia and buttocks are more often treated as comic relief. Public or private nudity does not pose a threat to American values and morality.

Too many Americans have an unhealthy and uncomfortable attitude towards the human body, the opposite sex, and sexuality in general. This attitude also extends to the female nipple which is objectively essential for breast-feeding babies. Perhaps this unhealthy obsession with occasional nudity, and then endlessly discussing it and looking at photos on the internet, might reflect a lack of a healthy occupation with sex.

This blog is not a discussion about the many variations of human sexuality but just the simple inability to look at the human body as something natural and that human sexual intercourse in its many forms are a normal part of our humanity. Perhaps some fault lies with most of the world’s religions and some of their extreme American expressions (i.e. Puritanism) for such a social, emotional and intellectual mess. Too many people were taught the strange view that things of the body are completely separate from things of the spirit, and anything enjoyable is probably ungodly and sinful.

We have for too long in the U.S. been taught and we still teach our children through our words and actions that human sexuality is somehow dirty and cannot be discussed openly in public, except by innuendo. Thus we only encourage more confusion, exploration, and some excessive behavior because we cannot take sex out of the “purient interest” closet. Children need to appreciate their bodies and learn to fully respect those of other people. They need to know the correct medical terminology for all the parts of the human anatomy and how to safely engage in sex while understanding the consequences. Then we can dump all our stupid euphemisms and warped attitutdes into the garbage heap of history.

In Europe with its far more casual attitude towards human sexuality and public nudity, pregnancy among unwed teenagers and sexually transmitted diseases are just a small fraction of what they are in the U.S. We are certainly doing something wrong with respect to sex education, particularly if we want to eliminate the need for abortion and the long-term public costs of unmarried teenagers raising children.

Perhaps all beauty pageants should require contestants to be judged in part on their complete naked state; otherwise they are not judging true beauty. If some performers and celebrities insist upon having public wardrobe malfunctions, they should be required to parade around publicly for a year completely naked. Maybe some professional sporting events should be conducted in the nude except jockstraps might be required for athletes during appropriate weather conditions. (We can probably forget about nude Cleveland Browns football in December even though fans will regularly show up practically naked painted in brown and orange to most games.) Most attendance records would be quickly broken for such modified sporting events.

Perhaps we should encourage all people of all ages, sizes, shapes, colors, and types to fully expose themselves at beaches and public pools. Then and only then when Americans get used to the human body in all its fascinating and natural forms that we may finally get over our stupid sexual perversions and hang-ups about our bodies. Sexual deviants would likely remain in the closet because they probably would not be able to handle an open and honest display of sexuality. Arguably if more women showed their nipples regularly, men might find looking into their eyes when talking to them to be far more interesting.

Of course, if everyone paraded around in their birthday suits, some might develop body envy of others. Those who are young and beautiful should be considered works of art. Unfortunately, those who are really ugly might best try a burka for a complete public cover-up. I’m sure Donald Trump would welcome the chance to separate the ugly from the beautiful. I have found nudists to be more practical and less obsessed about each other than those who are constantly teased by skimpy bikinis and partially-revealing outfits. The rest of us might just get a healthier outlook on ourselves and our fellow human beings.

Except for personal modesty or religious reasons, the only reason for clothing is to keep warm. In places and during seasons when keeping warm is no longer an issue, (i.e. Phoenix for 4 months when the daily temperature regularly goes over 100 degrees Fahrenheit) clothing should be optional. Of course, good personal hygiene is a must if one is to go around completely naked. Some little foldable loincloth might be needed when sitting on public trains and busses, in private cars, and riding bicycles.

Without clothing, we might all need to carry purses for our cell phones, iPods, keys, wallets and condoms. Shoes or sandals are probably still needed as our cement urban landscapes are not friendly to human feet. We would be able to fully apprciate those with extensive tatoos. We could probably eliminate most security checks at airports and public buildings if we literally have nothing to hide. Finally, we could save quite a bit of money in this recession if we dispensed with most of our clothing needs.

However, we do not have to create a completely open society everywhere to make ourselves more comfortable with the human body. Just permitting optional nudity at public beaches and pools, and on television when it is a normal part of the story, would be a sufficient national policy. Permitting mothers to breastfeed their children in most public places would also be a reasonable policy. Most important would be an intelligent and comprehensive sex education program in all our schools starting at age 10 when children begin to ask questions. Perhaps some adults should take a few sex-ed classes as well.

Of course some uptight people would scream that they should not be subjected to all this nudity and sexuality. They would simply have the right to stay home.

5/15/09 by Marc Pascal in Phoenix, AZ.

  • Silhouette
    Here we go again. Gay marriage "intro" number 47356-8...

    *sigh*...

    Today's veiled insult: "if you're against gay marriage you're a prude"...
  • NordicAngst
    Gay whatzit? I'm not sure if Silly above read the same article that I did, but then I'm not sure he's using the same definition of "veiled" either.

    That being said, I'm not really looking forward to the world of naked people everywhere. Frankly, I understand that Americans are a little over concerned with this stuff, but I'd still rather people kept their clothes on. The last bit where people who disagree "would simply have the right to stay home" is also pretty ridiculous no matter what the issue being discussed is.
  • HemmD
    As the old story goes, if you have a problem with my body, take it up with the maker.....

    I've never understood how those who praise God as a perfect being who thus can only create perfect things turn around and show shame for the "naughty bits."
  • CStanley
    I'm not a fan of public nudity because I think there is an intimacy associated with the unclothed body (not shamefulness, just something to be reserved for certain situations). That said though, the prurient interest that creates obsession with whether or not a nipple was exposed is quite bizarre. We have images of female bodies everywhere that reveal just about everything except the nipple of the breast, and those are considered acceptable (and most men will admit that the images with a tiny bit of clothing, strategically placed, are far more erotic to them than a completely naked woman would be- so the covering of just nipples is pretty ridiculous.)
  • DaGoat
    There are worse things to be obsessed with.

    I thought this was an interesting line:

    Of course some uptight people would scream that they should not be subjected to all this nudity and sexuality. They would simply have the right to stay home.

    It of course echoes the argument made by opponents of public smoking bans who feel if people don't like smoke they could just stay home.
  • Ryan
    If you made public nudity allowable few people would take you up on it. Mandatory... you have bigger problems. I'd be happy with people not losing their heads over it, though.
  • tidbits
    Americans really are pretty uptight about their sexuality. Forget Euro-Socialism, we could learn something from Euro-Sexuality. Enjoy what you've got while you've got it...if that's your wont.
  • bellisaurius
    People are often arbitrary about what their cultural taboos are.

    Example:

    Most people would probably be a bit upset about someone lounging around naked on their couch. They may argue the point of this is that "They're going to leave butt stuff on it." OK, so hygeine and sanitation. Seems non-arbitrary. Well, not so fast. Hand that person a sterilized cockroach, see if they take it. I doubt they would because it's the concept of "dirty" (which so often get's translated to immoral) is an imaginary one (arguments about bacteria being more of an excuse in most situations), or at least a cultutrally defined one.

    Now, what I imagine actually happens in a lot of cases of modesty isn't so much that nudity bugs the person (there is a much smaller subset of folks ofended by bitticelli nowadays, for example), but rather the feeling that other people will be bugged by the nudity (our sense of empathy, in a way, or at least our abiklity to put ourselves in other's shoes).
  • CStanley
    Well, there's also the fact that sometimes you can't help but feel empathy for people who are showing a lot more skin than anyone really wants to see, too, belli. ;-)
  • Irina69
    Yee, I dream sometimes too..)))
  • kritt11
    I'm with the "clothe the naked" faction, LOL. Most people look better with their clothes on and most are unaware of how bad they look with them off. A little mystery isn't such a bad thing.

    Maybe that's prudish- but if it is so be it! I'd rather see much less of most people.
  • PaulasPleasures
    Thank you for this blog entry! Back in the 70's (with women's lib) I think we were on the right path of overcoming our Puritan ideas that have been hammered into our heads, but now it seems that we've done some backsliding when it comes to sexual attitudes (especially about women). I think it's interesting that in Europe where things are much more "open" that the teenage pregnancy rate is much lower than it is here. When are we going to understand that sex is normal, healthy and that we shouldn't be teaching our children to be ashamed of their bodies?
  • meganrosee
    I wonder why it's okay to show a woman's breasts on TV or in the movies but they would never show a man's penis on TV or in a movie. And how come it can be shown on TV but not in public? It's illegal for us average boobed Americans to be on the beach topless but its perfectly fine to show some fake sculpted breasts in a movie to sell some more tickets... I think people are so afraid to talk about sex and about their bodies in America that the only bodies you see are the porn star's or the naked girl in a movie... making people even more afraid of their bodies and about showing them. And so the vicious cycle continues.. I have a perfectly normal and beautiful body and I hate feeling self conscious about it just because I don't look like those girls in the movies! I'd like to see some regular looking people for a change!
  • Very well said Marc.Thanks for the insight.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC