Romney’s Next “False Self” Coming Up

After morphing into a Tea Party zealot to win nomination, the GOP choice is in the kind of tricky transition described by JFK while running against Nixon in 1960: “It must be hard getting up every morning trying to decide who you’re going to be that day.

Nixon lost then but won eight years later by virtually erasing himself to edge out disorganized Democrats. Covering his campaign, Gloria Steinem wrote: “When Nixon is alone in a room, is anyone there?”

This year, running against a well-organized and well-heeled White House machine won’t be that easy. To win moderates in his own party and Independents, Mitt Romney will have to persuade them he is more than a not-Obama.

For the most robotic and least-loved Republican since Nixon, that challenge takes us into psychiatric territory first being explored back then—-the concept of the False Self.

In 1960, D. W. Winnicott described authentic awareness of “all-out personal aliveness” or “feeling real” as a True Self. In contrast, the False Self was designed to hide behind a “polite and mannered attitude,” concealing emotional deficits in those unable to feel spontaneous, alive or real to themselves in any part of their lives, yet managing to put on an outward “show of being real.”

Now, the False Self that GOP primary voters have been sensing in Mitt Romney will be put to a severe test.

MORE.

Auf Stumbleupon zeigen
Auf tumblr zeigen

Author: ROBERT STEIN

  • zephyr

    Romney’s play-acting, role changing, ever morphing persona hasn’t faced any real pressure yet… but it will soon. How will he hold up? I expect it to be interesting…

  • The Kid

    Thus begins the usual pre-election psychobabble. If Mitt Romney acts stilted in front of the cameras, the reasoning goes, he must be a faker; if he’s a faker, he must have psychiatric problems, which will only be exacerbated when he tries to portray himself as a moderate.

    Ridiculous.

    There’s no need to attribute Mitt’s problems to mental unbalance, especially when the real reasons are so obvious. Changing positions are standard political fare, and Mitt adjusts his tone of speech, stilts his vocabulary, and and tailors his overall image as campaigns in front of an audience of reporters, voters and running cameras because he is campaigning and because he is front of reporters, voters, and running cameras.

    Psychoanalyzing a candidate by examining the image he and his campaign put forth is, to dig up a tired old cliche, like judging a book by its cover.

    Or maybe by its fawning dust jacket.

  • dduck

    However, a facile smooth talker offering us a lot of platitudes, often does well.