I haven’t written anything on the Mark Sanford saga since Thursday morning, when I commented on his humanity and hypocrisy — what he did was all-too-human, however bizarre the contortions of his trip to Argentina and the lies of those close to him, but also, given his conservative Republican moralism, deeply hypocritical as well.

Since then, more has come out. For example:

— His wife, Jenny, now says she’s known about the affair since January.

— Fox News, hardly a media outlet to pass up sensationalism, whatever its partisan leanings, reported that the mistress, a 43-year old resident of Buenos Aires, is professional, passionate, and beautiful — and a brunette.

— Politico reported that Sanford had initially booked a 10-day trip.

— TMZ.com found the bar Sanford and his mistress went to, the owner of which noted that the two were “all over each other,” “kissing, holding hands and drinking wine.”

— The woman’s name, apparently, is Maria Belen Chapur. And, apparently, she’s hot.

— And then there was Dear Leader Rush, once again proving himself to be a top blowhard among blowhards, and spewing his usual partisan venom, blamed Obama for Sanford’s demise.

In that last post of mine, I said I felt sorry for Sanford — and certainly more so for his family, especially his wife. Do I still? Yes, I suppose I do. I may not agree with him on, well, anything, but I am not without compassion. I recognize that what he has done is not just all-too-human but all-too-common, and maybe he truly is remorseful. I hope so.

But it’s hard to feel sorry for him when he’s comparing himself to King David.

Yes, that’s right. King David:

I have been doing a lot of soul searching on that front. What I find interesting is the story of David, and the way in which he fell mightily, he fell in very very significant ways. But then picked up the pieces and built from there.

May I say it again?

Mark Sanford… you’re no King David. (Not that I knew King David, but I think I’m right.)

Now, I realize that the Bible is full of fictional(ized) stories meant to be edifying. And I realize, though I am neither Jew nor Christian (nor anything else of the kind), that those stories are not without value to all of us. They can say a lot to us, if we keep our minds open, and we can learn from them, Jew or Christian or not.

But come on… King David? Really? Is that the best comparison to be making at this point?

Sanford is saying many of the right things, and following the standard script — confession, apology, determination to heal, dismissal of the story, hope that it fades from the media’s attention — but this wasn’t one of them.

Now, should he resign? Well, that’s not for me to say… ultimately, Sanford is answerable to the people of South Carolina, not to the rest of us onlookers and commentators. And South Carolinians are divided. A poll that was conducted shortly after his Wednesday press conference has it 50-42 in favour of resignation.

But Mark Sanford, to Mark Sanford, is King David, and he’s not about to resign. (One of his advisors has said that resignation is not an option. Of course, that’s what they always say.)

We shall see.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)