One of the things that was stunning last night was to read some of the comments on weblogs and on Twitter about the NY 26 election insisting…shouting…that this had nothing to do with Medicare. That’s like saying Christmas has nothing to do with Jesus’ birth. This is a problem now locked into our political debate where there is a belief that if you say something over and over and over it must be true.

This may work with listeners of talk shows who hear a host suggest Barack Obama wasn’t born here or to followers of a guy who says the world will end on one day and then when it doesn’t happen pushes up the date of his prediction a few months. But it does not make for election-winning politics.

The Republicans now face a fundamental messaging problem. David Frum NAILS IT HERE.

If you couple this with Scott Walker in Wisconsin, a Democratic strategist will have a field day with anti-Republican messaging unless some in positions of power in the GOP step back and stop smelling the tea. The assertions of a Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity may feel good but they’re not the stand back analysis of a David Frum or a Larry Sabato or a Nate Silver.

Most fascinating: Despite the 24/7 partisans who insisted that anyone suggesting Medicare played a role in their GOP defeat in NY-26 MUST be a hack Democratic partisan, Paul Ryan himself acknowledge as much.

So — by their line of reasoning — he must be a Democratic party mole.

Actually, given the election results, who knows?

JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief
Sort by:   newest | oldest
JSpencer
Guest
JSpencer
5 years 3 months ago

There was a time not so terribly long ago when false narratives and lies were considered liabilities and character flaws, but the GOP and it’s media mouthpieces have worked long and hard to turn that once sacred standard on it’s tail. Of course this could never have become acceptable without consent of the base. I’d be curious to know how much is due to ignorance and how much is intentional.

dduck
Guest
dduck
5 years 3 months ago

Change GOP to Dems and you got a two baser.

davidpsummers
Guest
davidpsummers
5 years 3 months ago
The Republicans will claim it is about local issues. The Democrats will claim it is about how they are right on the issues. The next time the GOP wins an election, they will switch sides. Whoever wins in Nov. 2012 will claim the right to push their partisan positions without regard to checks and balances, not noticing (or pretending not to notice) that the much of the electorate is merely swinging back and forth of which party has been the worst recent (since they have no other choice). And, in the end, anyone who wants to break out of partisanship… Read more »
SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago

For fun, I’d suggest typing scott brown into the history bank here at TMV.

JSpencer
Guest
JSpencer
5 years 3 months ago

All false equivalence reflexing aside, medicare and social security are issues republicans will need to treat seriously and honestly if they hope to maintain influence with that segment of the population that votes the most – including thier own base.

dduck
Guest
dduck
5 years 3 months ago

Everybody into the pool.

ProfElwood
Guest
5 years 3 months ago

JSpencer, you have it exactly wrong. Although the Ryan plan sucks, so does the current course. The Republicans messed up by suggesting a change, where the Democrats have sat on the sidelines watching them suffer for it.
The lesson is pretty clear: empty talk is politically safer than addressing the budget.

SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago

Prof E

Spot on. My only addendum is that the current course sucks more than the Ryan plan because the current course won’t work.

tidbits
Guest
5 years 3 months ago

Harvesting votes has everything to do with perception and [almost] nothing to do with reality.

When the perception was that D’s would set up “death panels” and reduce Medicare benefits as part of ACA, they got creamed. Now that the perception is that R’s want to “throw grandma over the cliff” and end Medicare, guess what?

Same dance, different step.

Dorian de Wind, Military Affairs Columnist
Member

And the “River” keeps flowing:

Washington Post:

The Senate voted 57 to 40 against GOP Rep. Paul Ryan’s 2012 budget proposal, with all but five Republicans supporting the spending plan. The vote comes a day after Republicans lost a special congressional election in New York that was dominated by debate over the Ryan proposal, an election that underscored the political peril in the GOP plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program.

http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/KYNZS9/HDJKXW/JQ5HME/IOZBML/YEUHW/B7/h

JSpencer
Guest
JSpencer
5 years 3 months ago

Sure, the “current course” clearly needs correction, I think we can all agree on that. Those corrections will require creativity, honesty, and compassion though. Sad to say, those are all endangered qualities in today’s GOP. It takes two to tango and it sure helps if both partners are willing and able to dance.

TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
I must say I love watching the “the current course is horrible but at least they have a plan” arguments flip parties from ACA to MediReform. Both sides basically making the reverse of the argument they made last time and most seem to miss or deny it. For added amusement a special election was lost by the D’s as a price for the ACA and all the GOP said it was a warning to stop and the Dems ignored them and now the R’s pay a price for MediReform and the Dems warn them and the GOP is ignoring them.… Read more »
TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
Here is a difference between MediReform and the ACA a Republican will never accept or admit but it remains true. The GOP flat refused to join in on health reform unless it was purely their brand, meaning double down on “free market” in a nonfree market filled with regulations(and only whispered about that when defending their refusal to join in). The Dems on the other hand have not refused to find a fix for MediReform or even the budget, they have instead refused to do it while avoiding cutting GOP pet programs and redlines (tax increase, oil subsidies and the… Read more »
SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago

BS MSF. I’ll ask you for the fourth time. Show me the Dem plan for Medicare. Not a think tank plan but an actual plan supported by actual Democratic politicians.

TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
NO I did not say plan, I said they are not refusing to make deals. They just are not being asked, with the ACA the Dems asked from the start until the end. With MediReform it is the Ryan plan or the highway, with the ACA it was “lets see what we can put together” and the GOP sat it out. A subtle difference I suppose but an important one. I mean I suppose the Dems could put together a BS proposal like the GOP did during ACA but since it will go nowhere and is more about posturing than… Read more »
TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago

Am I the only person that finds this all rather funny???

SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago
Sure the GOP can make a deal like the Dems did on the ACA. It would go like this. GOP: We’re going to turn Medicare into a voucher system. Would you like to sign on to how we do that? Dems: Are you crazy? Medicare should not be a voucher program. We want no part of that. GOP: See, the Dems have no interest in making a deal. Something like that. And btw, I find this very funny. The short answer is nobody knows what will happen in 18 months and anyone pretending to is full of manure. The same… Read more »
Kathy Kattenburg
Member
5 years 3 months ago

Those corrections will require creativity, honesty, and compassion though

The last of those most of all, imo. Compassion? Pretty much a dead letter in contemporary politics.

Kathy

ShannonLeee
Guest
ShannonLeee
5 years 3 months ago

So I am still trying to understand how tax cuts for the rich…which is part of the Ryan plan…is going to balance our budget?

SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago

And I am still trying to understand the factual basis for the tax cuts for the rich accusation. Do you know what effective tax rates will be under the Ryan budget? If so, can you post the assessment?

TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
From David Stockman former Reagan budget director “I think both parties are delusional in thinking that this is a long-run problem. The Ryan plan gets the balanced budget in 2030, the fiscal hereafter. We have a here-and-now problem,” Stockman said. “Now, what does Ryan do in the next two or three years? Nothing. He cuts $600 (billion) or $700 billion of spending, mostly from a small part of the budget, discretionary and the safety net, leaves Medicare totally untouched for three years, leaves Social Security totally untouched for 10 years, leaves defense totally untouched for the next three years, and… Read more »
SteveinCH
Guest
SteveinCH
5 years 3 months ago

And your preferred solution MSF?

I agree the Ryan plan doesn’t do enough fast enough. It is still the best bill that has been passed on that score. We both favor a variant of Bowles-Simpson (although my variant would require substantial savings in Medicare). Too bad Ryan’s the only politician to table a plan that does anything

Taking him to task for not doing enough soon enough is fine. Of course, you should be taking the Dems to task as well but somehow that equivalence seems to escape you.

TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
Ryan should have made a clean bill, meaning focusing on the cuts and changes and left the Bush tax cuts out of the mix. This would have made the bill more difficult to malign but instead his ideology got the best of him. When the Dems move to an extremist remedy I will go after them, currently they are not offering up anything. I will be happy to laugh at them if they pull a Ryan though and try to “fix” the problem by creating something that gives them everything that their ideological blinders adore and cutting everything that offends… Read more »
TheMagicalSkyFather
Guest
TheMagicalSkyFather
5 years 3 months ago
To say it plainly Ryans plan is akin to the Dems ACA package actually being a fully socialized system, which it was not, and then demanding that the GOP support it because that is all there was. The GOP would have used that as a club to beat them with in the PR wars and rightly so and the same goes for Ryans plan. He could have avoided the PR debacle but he wanted the entire GOP ideology in a single bill and he crafted a bill that got rather close to that goal and is now crying that people… Read more »
JSpencer
Guest
JSpencer
5 years 3 months ago

Compassion? Pretty much a dead letter in contemporary politics. ~ Kathy K.

I think it’s a little more dead on one side of the aisle than the other. 😉

wpDiscuz