RahmboPistol.jpgAs a follow-up to my previous post on Obama appointees I would invite you to take a critical look at this editorial from Mark Karlin. The very progressive (or liberal, as you like) editor of BuzzFlash describes his long, storied and occasionally dysfunctional relationship with Rahm Emanuel, providing us with an excellent insider perspective on what the new Chief of Staff will bring to Team Obama.

Karlin was no fan of the pick either, but as it turns out his reasons were pretty much the opposite of my own concerns. One of Mark’s greatest fears is that Rahm will be too centrist, in the mold of the old DLC and Bill Clinton’s centrist maneuvering. Make no mistake, Karlin judges Rahmbo (who once mailed a dead fish to a political opponent) to be highly partisan to the Democratic cause, but not far enough to the left. Personally, I would hope that the Chief of Staff would be flying the moderate flag for Obama, but the author sees this as a minus.

The one bright spot he sees regarding Emanuel, though, is what I personally find the most disturbing. The phrase “pit-bull” may not be leaving the next phase of American politics any time soon.

Emanuel may very well prove an effective choice in dealing with a Congress that is too often tied up in knots by the Republicans. Remember that Emanuel will be carrying out Obama’s policies, and Rahm won’t be bringing a steak knife to the fights ahead; he’ll be shooting a bazooka.

That may be unpalatable to a lot of progressives, but the last person you want dealing with the remainders of the rabid right wing is a Quaker (although, yes, we are great admirers of the Quaker outlook). You need some muscle to shake up Capitol Hill, someone to blow a few knee caps off.

Rahm Emanuel can do that, with glee and a glint in his eye.

For Obama to live up to his post-partisan campaign rhetoric, this seems exactly the wrong type of heavy handed approach when working with Republicans in their new minority role. Let’s hope that Karlin doesn’t prove prescient and that Obama can keep the bazookas locked up in the armory while Rahmbo is in the house.

JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor
Sort by:   newest | oldest
StockBoySF
Guest
StockBoySF
7 years 10 months ago

One of my concerns all along has been that many members of congress will expect Obama to push through a liberal agenda (just like the Republicans pushed through their conservative agenda) while I think Obama will be more centrist. I view Rahm as someone who will keep Dems in line more than he going after Republicans.

Ricorun
Guest
Ricorun
7 years 10 months ago

Karlin ended his piece saying this: Yes, you can look at Emanuel’s appointment as a setback for progressive ideals, or you can look at it as an indication that Obama is prepared to do battle. Personally, I’m hoping it’s the latter.

Personally, I’m with SBSF — I’m hoping it’s both.

janinedm
Guest
7 years 10 months ago

I never took “post-partisan” to mean that he will be holding weekly slumber parties in the Rotunda. I take it to mean that he wants to support ideas over ideology. For example, if a Republican has a good idea that would benefit the people, don’t block it just to score partisan points. Likewise, if he’s got policy that may be unpopular, avoid diluting its effectiveness for political reasons.

Jazz
Guest
7 years 10 months ago

I’m not disagreeing with any of you on Obama’s stated intentions or which direction he wants to move. I’m just saying that Rahm’s style will likely be too aggressive to really build bridges when they *do* find Republicans with good ideas, or when they want to avoid “diluting” legislation, letting down the opposition gently and possibly offering something else as an olive branch.

djshay
Guest
djshay
7 years 10 months ago

From what I’ve read, he’s already built bridges with Republicans in the past and current administrations, hence the Lindsay Graham statement. It’s also been written that he has good relationships currently with several members of the Republican party. Sure, people like Boehner who are fast becoming the marginalized group of the Republican party, will butt heads with Rahm, but I don’t foresee a battle like you describe. And this?

“letting down the opposition gently and possibly offering something else as an olive branch.”

When were Dems ever afforded that respect by a republican?

DLS
Guest
DLS
7 years 10 months ago
The Left has been far more rabid than the Right. Let’s be honest! What the selection of this guy, nastier than any caricature of Tom “The Hammer” Delay, does, among other things is to belie the sweet lamb-y image of Obama. Both this guy and Podesta put the lie to what some of us always knew was a lie, about “bipartisanship” (we’ve known it means Do It Our Democratic Way, Or Else). As someone on a local Detroit program noted correctly, even before this election, Pelosi and Reid were well known for hubris and overreach, and just imagine what they’ll… Read more »
DLS
Guest
DLS
7 years 10 months ago
Bill Clinton and the DLC engaged in their fake-centrist “Third Way” repackaging of liberalism in the 1990s because of the public’s correct response in 1994 to the initial lunge by the Clinton administration* to the left in the old dinosaur-and-Sixties-radical sense. Only a tiny radicalism-leaning fraction of the public (Green Party and “liberal Democrat” material) wants this. The public loathed it (and the arrogance and conceit with which it was done). Hence, 1994. (Note who didn’t understand it.) What you may see more with Obama than in the 1990s is a true attempt to create a new, modern activist liberalism,… Read more »
DLS
Guest
DLS
7 years 10 months ago
“I view Rahm as someone who will keep Dems in line more than he going after Republicans.” Not just that, but likely reminding them that Obama is not their rubber stamp. A lot of people in Congress (where’s the age “concern” and jokes that we all heard time after time about McCain when it comes to the rest of Congress, with average age of returning members probably in the 70s?) are “lifers” or “fixtures” who outlast numerous successive people in the White House, and may view themselves as the keystone and most important people in Washington, and for the new,… Read more »
StockBoySF
Guest
StockBoySF
7 years 10 months ago
First, sorry for my poor grammar in my first comment- I dashed it off quickly without even a cursory proof reading. Second, I agree with janinedm, I think Obama will choose good ideas over idealogy. Which brings me back to my original comment that IMO Obama will use Rahm to keep Dems (who expect ideology) in line more than Republicans. I agree with DLS, we do need to pay attention to Obama’s cabinet picks. Though I’m not sure Obama will choose people who agree with him all the time. I think Obama wants people who are willing to push back,… Read more »
PeopleWatching
Guest
PeopleWatching
7 years 10 months ago
Thought-provoking post and blog. Relevant to your comments is the fact that many experts have argued these days that there are five, not four generations in the U.S., including Obama’s generation: Generation Jones…the heretofore lost generation between the Boomers and Generation X, now 42-54 years old. I’ve noticed quite a bit of buzz about GenJones in the context of this election; I saw several discussions on national TV about Obama being a Joneser, as well as about GenJones voters being a key swing vote. You may find this link interesting, my friends and I have been linking people to this… Read more »
wpDiscuz