Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jul 12, 2009 in Media | 1 comment

Journalism 101: Whoring in Hard Times

“The Washington Post‘s ill-fated plan to sell sponsorships of off-the-record ‘salons’ was an ethical lapse of monumental proportions.”

So says the paper’s ombudsman, Andrew Alexander, in a long mea culpa this weekend, underscoring how economic pressures can bedevil even those whose main business asset is a reputation for probity.

The lowliest staff member could have told the top people that it was not a good idea to ask $25,000 a head to attend “intimate dinners to discuss public policy issues” at the publisher’s home with reporters serving as discussion leaders for “an evening of spirited but civil dialogue” with lawmakers and Administration members but, organizations being what they are, nobody did.

“They were all,” Alexander writes, “aboard a fast-moving vehicle that, over a period of months, roared through ethics stop signs and plowed into a brick wall.”

When a flier seeking underwriters for the first dinner this month was made public, an uproar ensued: “The damage was predictable and extensive, with charges of hypocrisy against a newspaper that owes much of its fame to exposing influence peddlers and Washington’s pay-to-play culture. The Post‘s reputation now carries a lasting stain.”

It’s painful to imagine what Kay Graham, who took the heat for the Woodward/Bernstein exposure of Watergate that led to Richard’s Nixon downfall, would have made of her granddaughter’s decision to give lobbyists and their masters access to top government officials as well as her editors and reporters to help offset falling ad revenues.

Read the rest of this entry.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2009 The Moderate Voice
  • “The lowliest staff member could have told the top people that it was not a good idea” but, not surprisingly, nobody did. Certainly they all thought it was not their job to stand up against a business “opportunity” that was suported by all the top managers. After all, the plan was presented to them when the main decisions were already made. And in a time where cost cutting in on the rampage among the staff, nobody wants to expose himself as much. But instead of seeing that there is something seriously wrong with the discussion culture at WaPo, when everybody tries to keep such a low profile, Katharine Weymouth now dares to criticize their staff for not protesting her horrible idea:

    “After the fact, one person came to me and said: ‘I thought this was a bad idea all around.’ And I said: ‘You cannot come to me now and say that you thought this was a bad idea.’ I said ‘It is your job to raise objections at the time so we can have a discussion about it.’”

    Well, with such a management style on display, formally accepting responsibility but seeking the blame at others, totally ignoring that this is a systemic failure that is provoced by leadership, nothing is likely to change at the Post. And WaPo will have a hard time surviving the ongoing massacre among newspapers.

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :