Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Sep 14, 2013 in Featured, International | 5 comments

BREAKING: U.S., Russia agree to framework on Syria chemical weapons

shutterstock_110998394 (2)

The United States and Russian have now agreed on a deal to eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons. That is indeed a big deal — and now the tricky part is to ensure that the deal is kept or won’t fall by the wayside and discredit deal-making between the longtime historical adversaries:

Russia and the United States announced Saturday that they have reached a groundbreaking deal on a framework to eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons, after talks in Switzerland.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stood side-by-side as they set out a series of steps the Syria government must follow.

Syria must submit within one week a comprehensive list of its chemical weapons stockpile, Kerry said. International inspectors must be on the ground no later than November, he said.

Senior U.S. State Department officials said the timeline for action is the complete initial inspections of declared chemical weapons sites by November; the complete destruction of production and mixing and filling equipment by November; and the complete elimination of all chemical weapons material in first half of 2014.

The best way to ensure international control of Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal will be to remove as much as is feasible and to destroy it outside of Syria if possible, the framework document says.

Kerry said the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must allow “immediate and unfettered” access to international inspectors. He said there was no place for games or avoidance by al-Assad.

But Kerry said there shouldn’t be a problem reaching Syria’s chemical weapons sites provided the al-Assad regime cooperates, since Syria has moved its chemical weapons i


US Secretary of State John Kerry outlined a framework document under which Syria must hand over a full list of its stockpile within a week.

If Syria fails to comply, the deal could be enforced by a UN resolution backed by the threat of sanctions or military force.

The US says the Syrian regime killed hundreds in a gas attack last month.

The government of Bashar al-Assad denies the allegations and has accused the rebels of carrying out the attack on 21 August.

In a joint news conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Mr Kerry called on the Assad government to live up to its public commitments.

“There can be no room for games. Or anything less than full compliance by the Assad regime,” he said.

Mr Kerry and Mr Lavrov said if Syria failed to comply, then a UN resolution would be sought under Chapter VII of the UN charter, which allows for the use of force.

….Mr Kerry outlined six points to the agreement:

The amount and type of chemical weapons must be agreed and “rapidly” placed under international control
Syria must submit within one week a comprehensive listing of its stockpiles
Extraordinary procedures under the Chemical Weapons Convention will allow “expeditious destruction”
Syria must give inspectors “immediate, unfettered access” to all sites
All chemical weapons must be destroyed, including the possibility of removing weapons from Syrian territory
UN will provide logistical support, and compliance would be enforced under Chapter VII
France and the UK both welcomed the agreement.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said it was an “important advance”. France was the only country willing to join the US in taking military action in Syria.


The United States and Russia struck a deal Saturday under which Syria will allow its stockpile of chemical weapons to be removed or destroyed by next year — easing a crisis over a threatened American military attack.

Secretary of State John Kerry and his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, announced the deal after a third day of talks in Geneva.
Under the deal, Syria must provide a full catalog of its chemical arsenal within a week and allow United Nations inspectors to start working no later than November. The plan envisions the elimination of Syrian chemical weapons by mid-2014.
“There can be no games,” Kerry said. “No room for avoidance or anything less than full compliance.”

If Syria fails to comply, it will be referred to the U.N. Security Council, Kerry said. It was not clear what steps the Security Council might be. The deal includes nothing about the potential use of force, Lavrov said.

The Russian foreign minister called it an agreement “based on consensus and compromise and professionalism.” France welcomed it as an “important step forward.” Kerry and his British and French counterparts will talk about the deal’s implementation over lunch Monday in Paris.

The United Nations secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, welcomed the deal and pledged his support. Through a spokesman, he said he hoped that would not just prevent further chemical use in Syria but “help pave the path for a political solution to stop the appalling suffering inflicted on the Syrian people.”

Here’s a fitting song for the moment…

Follow blog comments HERE.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The Moderate Voice
  • sheknows

    Problem is…this is about as open ended as any agreement can get simply because there is nothing in place to enforce consequences on Syria’s default or dragging this out until the moon is colonized.

    I suppose as long as they don’t use these weapons again, we don’t care. But if they do…we are back at square one since there is nothing the UN will do about it. I think that an addendum should be added. Since Syria is known to have used chemical weapons, the UN will allow the use of military intervention if they do it again.
    That is not the way the 1993 convention reads, but it should be changed since this is now the 2nd time they have used them, possibly third. ( students with burns on Aug Aleppo)

    Adding such a failsafe will be showing a BIT of legitimacy to the UN ban on chemical weapons.

  • SteveK

    Personally I think that’s great news… But I am aware that it takes all kinds.

    Eeyore is a character in the Winnie-the-Pooh books by A. A. Milne. He is generally characterized as a pessimistic, gloomy, depressed, anhedonic, old grey stuffed donkey who is a friend of the title character, Winnie-the-Pooh.

    Pooh Corner anyone?

  • ShannonLeee

    Awesome. So effectively, we will be able to get rid of some unknown amount of chemical weapons that Russia will be able to replace once the inspectors are gone and happy…which will not happen. Why? because Russia will never allow the UN SC to approve a strike because of non-compliance.

    OK, getting rid of some stock piles is a good thing. Bad thing. We just kicked the can down the road a half year, while also managing to look like fools and losing the respect from a lot of people on the planet. (yes, I have talked to many people from different countries about this and about half are disappointed that we did not hit Syria for the chemical attacks.)

  • 12tones

    Those disappointed groups should remember that we took similar approaches and it failed every time.
    Moderation will last longer, we have our priority which is education, repair the roads and bridges and care for our veterans…..

  • ShannonLeee

    Yes, let the world self destruct. It will have no effect on us.

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :