She has become a stereotypical figure–loved or reviled, depending on the beholder’s politics–but the other day, for a brief moment, Sarah Palin let herself be seen as a human being with complicated emotions.

The Alaska governor made news by telling a right-to-life meeting that, after learning of abnormalities in the child she was bearing last year, she had for “a fleeting moment” considered abortion.

Palin was emphasizing that she had decided to have the baby, but her description of the inner turmoil in making up her mind had none of the usual pit-bull-with-lipstick comedy of her public persona.

The results of the amniocentesis, she said, “blew me away, rocked my world” and helped her understand “the complexities of what a woman goes through”

Palin went on to explain that no one, not even her husband knew (“I was out-state, nobody knows”) and it would have been “easy to make it all go away, take care of it.”

The disclosure of such feelings answers a pathologist’s question of why, given her convictions, Palin would have undergone amniocentesis, in which “more normal fetuses would be aborted by the procedure than would abnormal ones be detected.”

Clearly, as a 44-year-old career woman with four children, Palin was worried about the pregnancy–as most people in her position would be–and it is touching to hear her describe the inner turmoil over it in human terms, even if only to make a political point.

MORE.