The Koran and Infidels. Make that Non-Muslims.
Mustafa Akyol wrote yet another fascinating column for Turkish Daily News, this time about a subject that will interest not just people who are interested in Turkish politics, but also those who are interested in religion and Islam (in the world). The subject: the Koran and non-Muslims.
Many years ago, I came across a book, which claimed to explain â€œIsraeli terrorismâ€ in the light of the Hebrew Scriptures. It was full of photos showing Israeli soldiers attacking and harassing Palestinians, and presented huge captions that included verses from the Old Testament, and especially the Book of Joshua. If the Israelis were breaking the bones of a Palestinian youngster â€” a globally notorious scene from the â€˜80s â€” then the caption would include a verse with something like â€œThou shall break their bones.â€ The book’s argument was blunt and simple: The Israelis were torturing a nation because that was what their religion ordered them to do.
The more I learned about the Old Testament and the politics of the Middle East, the more I realized that what the book presented was not analysis but anti-Semitic propaganda. It is true that Israel’s 40-year-long occupation is a pretty brutal one, and that the Old Testament included some belligerent passages, but the reality was much more complex. I noticed that Jewish religious sources also include many words of wisdom and compassion, and that there are so many Jews who are willing to have peace with their Arab neighbors. Indeed the militants who advocate and even practice violence in the name of Judaism â€” as CNN’s Christian Amanpour recently exposed in her superb documentary, â€œGod’s Warriorsâ€ â€” are pretty marginal. Moreover, the source of their hatred is actually not the confrontational passages of the Torah, but the political and social situation that they are in.
In other words, they go angry and violent not because they read their religious texts, but because they focus on the harsher parts of those texts since they are already angry and violent for a myriad of reasons.
For now, I will not deal with his take on the documentary at CNN, this for two reasons. The first: I did not watch it. The second: after reading a lot about it, I decided that I do not want to watch it either. It seems to be yet another case of political correctness at work. Anyway, back to Akyol’s column:
In recent years, I often recall my experience with that anti-Semitic book and the way it misread the Hebrew Scriptures, because I see that more and more people are doing the same thing with the Koran. When Islamic terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda bomb innocents, or when some fringe imam in a radical mosque preaches hatred toward non-Muslims, these greenhorn â€œIslam expertsâ€ find some passages in the Koran, which apparently justify such extremists. No wonder that these extremists themselves refer to similar passages in the Koran or other Islamic sources. The situation is very similar to the strange agreement between the anti-Semites and the Jewish terrorists on the wrong notion that Judaism justifies carnage.
He explains that many Muslims seem to make the mistake that they focus on one sentence and take it completely out of context. Islam’s scholarly tradition, however, called “tafseer” teaches that “a single verse or passage can’t be understood in itself; it has to be evaluated according to the other parts of the Koran, the general goals and principles of the holy text, and the way it was implemented by the prophet.”
He then looks at what the Koran says about non-Muslims, and how Muslims should deal with them. He makes the case that the real teaching of the Koran is that both Christians and Jews (all who believe in the One God basically) will be rewarded for their good deeds in the afterlife. Besides that, he also points out that according to the Koran, Muslims should treat other people well (also when those people are non-Muslims), as long as the latter do not use violence against Muslims (which seems logical).
His main point is that if one wants to understand the Koran, one has to use one’s intelligence, common sense, and reading skills. Looking at one sentence and taking it out of context is idiotic. I agree with Mr. Akyol, but the sad reality is that many Muslims see things quite differently. That is why it is important that people like Mr. Akyol write columns in which they deal with this subject. Lord knows I do not always agree with Mr. Akyol’s politics, but I do believe that he is a moderate and that he is a Muslim who opposes fundamentalism. We need more people like him – in politics, but also in newspapers. Change has to come from two sides: secular Turks and truly moderate Islamists.
Today, by the way, I was reading a book by Orhan Pamuk – one of Turkey’s greatest writers – called Snow. The story describes the life of a man called Ka – a poet who was born in Turkey, but who moved to Germany when he was 20 years old or so. After living 12 years in Frankfurt, Germany, he decided to go back to Turkey to find happiness. Or better said, a wife. He first goes to Istanbul, but his heart and his fate bring him to the city of Kars. Kars is a poor city (at least in the book); unemployment is high; radical Islam is on the rise; the PKK has quite some influence and power; all in all, normally not a nice place to live. Anyway, the battle between secularism and fundamentalist Islam forms a major part of the book. This book made me think about the problems in Turkey (should headscarves be allowed in public spaces or not?). I will write more about this tomorrow, but I have to say that the problem became a bit more clear to me.