Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Oct 27, 2015 in 2016 Elections, 2016 Presidential Election, Government, Politics | 4 comments

Benghazi hearing was a self-defeating travesty

Randall Enos, Cagle Cartoons

Randall Enos, Cagle Cartoons

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton must have been mindful of the old adage that you never interrupt an enemy when he is making a mistake. She sat in the witness chair with the patience of Job, hour after endless hour, while the House Select Committee on Benghazi did all it could to make her our next president.

How much of a self-defeating travesty was last week’s hearing for the Republican Party? The answer is obvious from how quickly the GOP has sought to turn the page.

Had a glove been laid on the presumptive Democratic nominee, the Sunday talk shows would have been a jamboree of Clinton-bashing. As it was, chief inquisitor Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., could only grumble on “Meet the Press” that Clinton’s testimony lacked “wholeness and completeness,” by which he seemed to mean she failed to make a case against herself. Gowdy also said he regretted that the hearing was held publicly rather than behind closed doors.

Among the Republican presidential contenders, the most deliciously ironic reaction came from New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who claimed Clinton was “unaccountable” because she left the Benghazi compound’s security arrangements to be handled by lower-ranking State Department professionals.

As “Face the Nation” host John Dickerson pointed out, Christie gave a similar explanation to exonerate himself in the George Washington Bridge scandal.

Front-runner Donald Trump more wisely chose a pox-on-both-houses approach, observing in a CNN interview that the hearing was “very partisan” and “the level of hatred between Republicans and Democrats was unbelievable.” He used the occasion to paint himself as a “great unifier,” which will come as a surprise to the beleaguered GOP establishment.

Gowdy was chosen to head the Benghazi committee because of his experience as a prosecutor. Maybe he’s better at real trials than show trials. Presiding over Thursday’s marathon farce, he was a disaster.

His biggest mistake was failing to foresee the dynamics of the hearing: It was always likely that Clinton, not the committee, would dominate the room.

After all, this was hardly Clinton’s first rodeo. With all her experience at congressional hearings, both asking and answering questions, she knew it was the witness who had ultimate control over pace and tone. However aggressive the Republicans were in firing their questions, she answered calmly, slowly, almost sweetly. She was like a tennis player who just keeps lobbing the ball back across the net until her opponent becomes frustrated and makes a mistake.

Gowdy appeared to orchestrate the hearing so that his one tidbit of new information was revealed late in the day, when Clinton might be tired and more likely to stumble: a previously unreported email to her daughter, Chelsea, blaming the Benghazi attack on terrorists at a time when other administration officials were saying it began as a spontaneous demonstration.

But the committee member assigned to confront Clinton with the email was Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and it was he, not the witness, who seemed cranky and out of sorts. Perhaps the pressure of heading the Freedom Caucus of rejectionist House Republicans is getting to him.

Clinton explained that she wrote the email in question after the terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia reportedly claimed credit for the attack — but before that same group denied responsibility. Jordan ignored Clinton’s response and went on sputtering about an allegedly “false narrative.”

Clinton had already won the narrative contest, however. Hours earlier, she told the riveting story of how, as the Benghazi diplomatic compound burned, State Department security personnel desperately searched through thick black smoke for diplomat Sean Smith and Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. They found Smith’s body but did not know for many hours that Libyans had taken Stevens to a hospital and tried, but failed, to revive him.

Gowdy’s committee couldn’t decide exactly what Clinton was supposed to have done wrong. At times, they suggested she was too detached; at other times, they accused her of micromanagement. The fact that a friend and former aide named Sidney Blumenthal sent Clinton a number of self-important emails is somehow unforgiveable, I gather, although committee members were at pains to explain why.

In a hearing that began at 10 a.m. and ended 11 hours later, hardly any time was spent on the one legitimate issue arising from Benghazi: the wisdom of U.S. policy in Libya. U.S. military support helped oust a brutal dictator. But we also helped create a failed state where terrorism quickly took root.

Does Clinton have any second thoughts? Maybe a serious committee will ask her someday.

Eugene Robinson’s email address is [email protected] (c) 2015, Washington Post Writers Group

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 The Moderate Voice
  • DdW

    Excellent!

    The ‘non-prosecutorial’ gang of seven — or was it six? — might have done a little better if they had understood one of the basic rules of tennis mentioned by Robinson: “[Hillary] was like a tennis player who just keeps lobbing the ball back across the net until her opponent becomes frustrated and makes a mistake.”

    And mistakes were made — oh so many!

    • Slamfu

      I think it was more like Clinton was the only one to bring a racket to the game. They had nothing and it showed. The fact they made such a big deal out of this and didn’t cut it short just goes to further convince me that the GOP doesn’t just spout their BS to sway the more gullible voters, they actually believe their own absurd talking points.

      • Direct result of living in the right-wing echo chamber. The hearing and the Republicans’ non-responses to Hillary’s patient, coherent, well-reasoned testimony reminded me of Obama’s interactions with the House Republicans at their retreat in his first term.
        In both settings, they seemed shocked to encounter a plausible, reasoned counter-argument to their recitation of Fox News talking points.

      • DdW

        Continuing the tennis analogy, the Gowdy team lost game, set and match in spite of the fact that so many falsehoods foot faults were not called — the Cummings team (including Mrs. Clinton) called a few, but there were just too many. In spite of calling so many facts balls lies out that were clearly true in and vice versa.

        The Gowdy team failed miserably double-faulted every time they tried to smear score aces on Mrs. Clinton.

        But most importantly the Cummings team kept their eye on the truth and nothing but the truth the ball at all times while the Gowdy team kept trying to score cheap political points smash the ball and failed miserably hit it into the net every time.

        Even with the help of FOX News and their cronies a lousy referee the inquisition match was a disaster for the Gowdy team.

        After such a licking, it is not at all clear whether the Gowdy team will ask for a rematch.

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com