Canada to stay in Afghanistan
The Globe and Mail has the breaking news:
A motion to extend Canada’s mission in Afghanistan narrowly passed in the House of Commons Wednesday night despite a lack of support from the NDP and the Bloc Québécois.
The motion, which squeaked through 149-145, called for the support of the House in extending the military mission by two-years, after its current commitment expires in February 2007.
The minority Conservative government was supported by just enough Liberals (including noted academic and party leadership hopeful Michael Ignatieff) to put the motion over the top.
Canada has about 2,300 troops in Afghanistan. And, according to the Globe, “Canada has… been asked by NATO to consider taking over the command of the entire Afghanistan mission in 2008″.
Yet public opinion is deeply divided over Canada’s military presence in Afghanistan. Sixteen Canadian troops have been killed there since 2002. The latest was Nichola Goddard: “A female Canadian soldier was killed Wednesday during an intense firefight with Taliban insurgents near Kandahar, marking what is believed to be the first death of a Canadian woman in combat in more than 60 years.”
The debate will continue.
3 Responses to “Canada to stay in Afghanistan”
Why do the Canadians want to leave Afghanistan? I can understand wanting nothing to do with Iraq. But Afghanistan is a different animal entirely. The Taliban – the genuine article and protector of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawhiri – are trying to get back into power in Afghanistan. Why would the Canadians want to leave?
Ya, I’m a bit confused as well. What’s Canada’s problem with Afghanistan?
Canada looses sixteen troops and then want to pull out? What is wrong with Canada? I can understand Iraq, it was an unnecessary war that people were misled into but Afghanistan is a different story.