An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Lessons Learned? For Democrats, Not the Correct Ones

If Democrats were Republicans, they would be doubling down the day after electoral defeat. They would be pushing through their agenda even harder — not bemoaning the “message” voters had sent. But Democrats are not Republicans. Democrats are Democrats, and so they are doing what Democrats do better than anyone else on the planet: cave, run, admit defeat.

Paul Krugman is “pretty close to giving up on” the POTUS:

Health care reform — which is crucial for millions of Americans — hangs in the balance. Progressives are desperately in need of leadership; more specifically, House Democrats need to be told to pass the Senate bill, which isn’t what they wanted but is vastly better than nothing. And what we get from the great progressive hope, the man who was offering hope and change, is this:

I would advise that we try to move quickly to coalesce around those elements of the package that people agree on. We know that we need insurance reform, that the health insurance companies are taking advantage of people. We know that we have to have some form of cost containment because if we don’t, then our budgets are going to blow up and we know that small businesses are going to need help so that they can provide health insurance to their families. Those are the core, some of the core elements of, to this bill. Now I think there’s some things in there that people don’t like and legitimately don’t like.

In short, “Run away, run away”!

Liberal blogtopia is awash with frustration at a Democratic Party leadership (h/t Digby) that could have gotten a good, strong health care reform bill passed six months ago had they been competent and confident enough to take advantage of their 60-vote supermajority when they had it — and that now is complaining that they can’t do what they could have done and should have done back in early summer because they lost their supermajority.

The collective Democratic nervous breakdown is most stunningly portrayed in an email sent to Josh Marshall by an unnamed Senate staffer. Here is Josh’s introduction; the entire email is below that:

I want to recommend that everyone read the email we just got from a Senate staffer who will have to remain anonymous. Here’s one part of the email that stood out to me. The whole thing is after the jump …

The worst is that I can’t help but feel like the main emotion people in the caucus are feeling is relief at this turn of events. Now they have a ready excuse for not getting anything done. While I always thought we had the better ideas but the weaker messaging, it feels like somewhere along the line Members internalized a belief that we actually have weaker ideas. They’re afraid to actually implement them and face the judgement of the voters. That’s the scariest dynamic and what makes me think this will all come crashing down around us in November.

If you don’t look at any of the other links in this post, read that email. It really will take your breath away.



10 Responses to “Lessons Learned? For Democrats, Not the Correct Ones”

  1. shannonlee says:

    I'll say it again…

    Maybe the Dems need a good cleansing in 2010. They need to overhaul their leadership.

  2. Lit3Bolt says:

    Asking Democrats to have a spine is like asking Republicans to admit government is good for something. Not going to happen.

  3. Leonidas says:

    Yes they need to overhaul their progressive leadership and turn to the middle, if they don't they will get crushed in 2010.

  4. Schadenfreude_lives says:

    I feel like this is deja vu all over again.

    As the Republicans started losing more and more of their electoral power in the 2000's, there were calls from within the party to be even more Right-leaning. That 'advice' was followed, for the most part, leading to further and further erosion of the number of Congressional and gubernatorial seats they held, culminating in the loss of the Presidency (with a big assist by GWB/Cheney, of course) and the Democrats achieving a super-majority in the Senate.

    Now the political tides seem to be turning against the Democrats, and they seem to be trying to convince themselves that following the failed Republican strategy of appeasing the the extreme wing of their party is the path back to glory.

  5. Leonidas says:

    The progressive wing of the democratic party is every bit as nuts as the far right of the GOP. They use the same tactics, have the same inability to see reality and will meet the same fate as the moderates and independents distance themselves from the crazy people.

  6. Rudi says:

    Remember that special elections are VERY local. Why are we forecasting a Democratic demise, when the Repugs lost two elections in New York. Larison nails it – good campaigners beat lousy candidates ALWAYS…

    I had already been thinking about the three special elections for Congress we have seen in the last year before Continetti wrote this, but this reminded me of an important point that needs to be made. It is a simple observation, and so obvious that it might be considered unnecessary: candidates and campaigns matter. Hoffman showed no interest in the concerns of the district he wanted to represent, his allies belittled local interests as “parochial” and he served as little more than a mouthpiece of national party and movement activist slogans. NY-23 was lost in much the same way that Coakley lost in Massachusetts: a candidate who seemed indifferent to the people he wanted to represent proved to be a horrible fit with the electorate. Similarly, Jim Tedisco in NY-20 ran an atrocious campaign that was marred by poor messaging, confusion over his positions and the interference of the national party. Tedisco, Hoffman and Coakley have something important in common: all of them had every advantage in terms of party registration, funding and and voting patterns, and they squandered all of these.

  7. kathykattenburg says:

    You're right, unfortunately. Obama ran such an unapologetic campaign that I really believed he was not going to act like a Democrat when he got into office. I was wrong.

  8. dduck12 says:

    Wow, that was quite an email. I'd love to hear one from a Rep. staffer.

  9. Lit3Bolt says:

    The puzzling thing is Obama is barely addressing HCR. He's focused on banks and running against the “last eight years” again. Except nobody's going to remember the Bush years, they're going to remember this past year about Congress was dithering with HCR and Obama was strangely absent. If he thinks he's not going to take any flak if HCR “because that's Congress' job,” he is so sadly mistaken it's pathetic.

    Obama's behavior is truly mysterious, because during the 2008 he proved he could play the game. And now that he's president, he seems to think he's above it.

  10. kathykattenburg says:

    I certainly agree, Lit.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity