U.S., Britain and Spain Close Embassies In Yemen Due to Al Qaeda Threat
The United States, Great Britain, and Spain have closed their embassies in Yemen, pointing to threats from Al Qaeda amid signs that the perception of Yemen has now shifted so the country is being clearly perceived as a growing threat as an Al Qaeda base. Spain’s embassy staff will remain working, although its embassy will be closed to the public Monday and Tuesday.
The Christian Science Monitor reports:
The US and Britain closed their embassies in Yemen Sunday, citing threats from Al Qaeda. Coming one day after President Obama publicly linked the Al Qaeda branch in Yemen to the failed airline bomb plot on Christmas Day, the move signals that the US is now taking the growing Al Qaeda threat in Yemen more seriously.
BBC News reports that it is unclear how long both embassies will remain closed. The US embassy released a statement saying that it would be closed Sunday, but did not specify when the mission would reopen. Agence France-Presse also reports that the US embassy sent a message to US citizens in Yemen Thursday reminding them of the terrorist threat.
The US embassy in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, has been attacked before: In 2008, a car bomb attack killed 19 people, including one American. And in 2000, the attack on the USS Cole killed 17 American sailors, as The Christian Science Monitor reported recently in a review of Al Qaeda-linked attacks that have involved Yemen.
The impoverished country has been in the spotlight recently as its Al Qaeda affiliate, called Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, appears to be establishing a foothold there from which to launch global attacks. At the same time, Yemen’s government is also fighting rebels in the north and a separatist movement in the south….
And Spain? Times Online:
Spain has also decided to close its embassy in Sanaa on Monday and Tuesday, the newspaper El Mundo said, quoting embassy sources….
The website Typically Spanish reports that staff will still be working at the Spanish embassy:
It remains operational, despite both the US and the UK deciding to close their embassies in Sanaa
Spain on Sunday decided to restrict access to its embassy in Yemen in response to threats from Al Qaeda, and it’s understood from El Mundo newspaper that the building is to be closed to the public over Monday and Tuesday. It came after both the US and UK Embassies decided to close earlier in the day. The US Embassy in Sanaa was the first to make the move, announcing on its website, that their offices were closed, ‘in response to ongoing threats by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula to attack American interests in Yemen’.
Times Online offers this history of how the U.S. Embassy there has been a target over the years:
March 2003 Two people shot dead and dozens wounded as police clash with demonstrators trying to storm the US Embassy.
January 2008 Gunmen in a car exchange fire with police at a checkpoint near the Embassy, hours after it receives threats of a possible attack by al-Qaeda. Nobody injured.
March 2008 Three mortars miss the Embassy and crash into a high school for girls nearby, killing a security guard.
April 2008 Embassy personnel put on a one-week lockdown, barred from leaving their homes or the Embassy after al-Qaeda suicide bombings target South Korean visitors.
September 2008 Nineteen people, including an 18-year-old American woman and six militants, die when US Embassy is attacked by gunmen and two vehicles packed with explosives. None of those killed or wounded is a US diplomat or embassy employee. Al-Qaeda in Yemen claims responsibility.
July 2009 Security upgraded in Sanaa after intelligence reports warn of attacks planned against the Embassy.
Here’s an AP video via You Tube that summarizes this most recent development:
opinions powered by SendLove.to
9 Responses to “U.S., Britain and Spain Close Embassies In Yemen Due to Al Qaeda Threat”
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TMV, ExPatsSpain. ExPatsSpain said: US, Britain and Spain Close Embassies In Yemen Due to Al Qaeda Threat http://bit.ly/62FYoz [...]
Yemen is so insecure and unstable that the US and Britain are closing their embassies.
In other news, the Obama Administration plans to continue to send Gitmo detainees to Yemen. We can't get the Yemeni Government to protect our embassy but let us assure you they are going to make sure that that same government maintains control over the jihadists we send them. This is called taking a mistake made by Bush and doubling or tripling down on the same bet. Our own government acting stupidly appears again to be a key part of the problem.
The United States is working with the Yemeni government to make sure “the situation on the ground is taken into account,” Brennan said.
“We're going to do this the right way at the right time,” he said.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/03…
And the game of “whack-a-mole” continues.. The alternative is to turn the game off at it's source: oil. Become weaned from foreign oil and the whole issue will vaporize.
Global Warming source: fossil fuels
Terrorism Threat source: fossil fuels
Financial Demise source: outlay to foreign fossil fuels
GDP/Auto Industry Slump source: lack of competitive non-fossil-fuel cars
re we getting the picture?
Uh huh? So, at around $50,000 a year each, you want us to house them for life? Or should we just kill them?
[...] unwanted healthcare down our throats via black helicopter forays, contrails, and FEMA camps ! http://themoderatevoice.com/57958/u-…-qaeda-threat/ Reply With Quote + Reply to Thread « Previous Thread | [...]
Try 'em in military tribunals, hang the ones that are convicted, keep the rest in less luxurious and expensive accommodations until the War on Terror is over. After the Jihadists stop blowing up civilians for a ten year period, we can declare the war over, and subject the detainees to a year of art therapy before releasing them if you want.
Agreed. Former Homeland head, Chertoff, said today on Meet The Press, that the release of the Yemenis during the B admin., probably was a mistake and we should not rush to release any more. I don't want some released guy training more crotch bombers that wind up costing more than $50,000 a year in legal, housing costs. (But, it does sell papers and provides us bloggers with plenty of gas time.)
BTW: Chertoff (also a lawyer, but I don't think ever a judge) said he was not in favor of the civilian NYC 9/11 trial.
…or just skip all that stuff and let the problem work itself out as we radically reduce purchase of their oil.
Anything but that right? We literally will kill and be killed unendingly and put the entire globe on the edge of peril just to keep a handful of rich Texans and their stockholder buddies in the fat for a few more years.
Please light a candle for T. Bone Pickens, he should be your anti-oil hero.