America: The Debt-Ridden Land of Pointy Partisan Fingers

finger-pointing-796415_1.jpg

Senator Evan Bayh (D-Indiana), writing in CNN, says he plans to oppose raising the debt ceiling what the issue comes up for a vote next month. He’s unwilling to raise this ceiling, he writes, unless “Congress adopts a credible process to balance our books and eliminate the red ink” — and he wants to form a “debt commission” to start the process.

A debt commission will force members of Congress to take — or reject — a single gulp of politically difficult medicine to treat the fiscal problems that are ailing our country. Those who choose not to take that medicine would be forced to explain to their constituents why a $12 trillion national debt doesn’t make them queasy.

Unfortunately, members of Congress won’t have to explain anything to their constituents. Partisans and liberals are already taking virtual pens to paper to attack him:

There are, however, some issues to consider. For example, it was none other than Evan Bayh who recently voted to “reform” the estate tax, cutting taxes for the extraordinarily rich, at a cost of $750 billion over the next decade. To pay for it, he recommended … nothing. The costs would simply all be added to the deficit. Given this, I hope he’ll forgive my skepticism about his credibility on the subject of fiscal responsibility.

And just like that, Bayh’s entire suggestion is chucked out the window. Steve Benen goes on with the usual spiel about how its really more the Republicans fault anyway — an increasingly tired excuse, from my perspective, for the lack of fiscal discipline by The Powers That Be.

Now, I’m just an average non-economist, but here’s how I see this: It does not matter who did what in the past.

Long-term deficits drive up interest rates for consumers, raise prices of goods and services, and weaken our country’s financial competitiveness and security.

The bigger our deficits, the fewer resources we have to make critical investments in energy, education, health care and tax relief for small businesses and middle-class families.

The bigger our deficits, the more we must borrow from foreign creditors like China, allowing governments with competing interests to influence our economic and trade policies in ways that run counter to our national interest.

Elementary school tactics like finger-pointing do nothing to forestall these problems, and partisan sniping merely increases the unproductive polarization. Yet people are indulging themselves at every opportunity — no doubt because it makes great red meat to feed the ongoing frenzy.

And, of course, it’s much easier to point and blame than fix problems.

Listen: I don’t care anymore that George W. Bush cooked the Iraq War funding books. I don’t care anymore which party enabled the Fannie Mae cluster and pushed funding for mortgages people couldn’t afford. I don’t care anymore whether there was a “D” or an “R” trailing behind anybody’s name… whether it was last month, or last year, or during my grandfathers’ days.

We’re in the midst of a massive national belt-tightening — a process both necessary and long-overdue. From the citizen who borrowed against tomorrow because s/he “had to have” that wide-screen television, to the lawmaker who “had to bring home the bacon”, we’ve been the very epitome of excess borrowing and consumerism. It’s brought us right to our knees, and we’re going to stay there until our leaders find some fortitude.

Folks are going to have to suck it up and do without a pet project or cause for while — no matter how worthy or near-and-dear it may be.

I’m sorry about that, but this utter failure to control our spending is eventually going to crash all those projects anyway — and if the people currently in charge are unable to get past their own ideological childishness, then I want them out of there, donkey or elephant.

Period.

Author: POLIMOM

54 Comments

  1. ProfElwood,

    I put Bush Spending Record as a search criteria in Google and I ended up with 9,850,000 hits.
    I put Obama Spending Record as a search criteria in Google and I ended up with 9,050,000 hits.

    Obama hasn't been in office a full year yet.

  2. So, people are talking more about deficits when they're three times the previous size. Big surprise.
    Next shock: there's been more talk about health care lately.

  3. So, people are talking more about deficits when they're three times the previous

    How Trillion-Dollar Deficits Were Created

    As you can see in the above chart that most of the Deficit was created by Bush and the Recession…

    And when this deficit was being created, Conservatives/Republicans with a handful of honorable exception didn't say anything, but now that a Democrat is in the White House dealing with their fuckups, they are all screaming bloody murder, attempting to blame the Democrat for their fuckups.

    In conclusion for most Republicans/Conservative the Debt is only an issue when a Democrat is in the White House and said Debt created by Republicans/Conservative is to be used to stymie his agenda.

  4. I've been reading blogs and looking at internet news for a long time now. Because I read both liberal and conservative rags, I can conclusively say that people were upset with Bush. Why do you think that the Republican party took such a hit during his last term? The conspiracy theories jumped up a notch or two also, but I bet you didn't hear about that! I read this rhetoric time and time again, but it says more about the writer than the times: they were complaining in places you aren't reading.

Submit a Comment