An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

America’s ‘Black Knights’ and the Fort Hood Tragedy: Dar Al Khaleej, United Arab Emirates

CAPTIONS SAYS: ‘DREAM OF THE ARABS’, AS A ‘ZIONIST’ ARM PUNCTURES THE BALLOON OF THE DREAM

Continuing our coverage of the global reaction to the Fort Hood killings, this morning we posted this Arabic op-ed from the United Arab Emirates – a moderate Arab state considered friendly toward the United States.

Writing for the Dar Al Khaleej, columnist Saad Mehyo suggests a common Arab explanation for many of the world’s difficulties: a conspiracy directed by the “extremist right-wing Jewish-American alliance,” in this case, designed to scuttle President Obama’s attempts to improve U.S. relations with the Arab world. This may sound far fetched to Americans – but to many people beyond our shores, it’s an article of faith.

For Dar Al Khaleej, Saad Mehyo forecasts two possible explanations for why Major Hasan opened fire on his fellow soldiers – Mehyo himself calling his second possible explanation a conspiracy theory:

“First, the incident of Major Nidal Hassan may truly have resulted from his abysmal psychological state. But despite this, the black knights [extremist right-wing Jewish-American alliance] will seek to exploit the tragedy to the point that the hearts and minds of Americans will take their side in the tug-of-war with those who favor dialogue.

“Second, (and here is where the conspiracy theory comes in) someone may have manipulated the mind of this officer with drugs and psychological pressure, in order to push him to commit this act.”

And why does Mehyo think option number two is such a likelihood? Because, he writes, it has happened before:

“American investigative journalist James Bamford (who relied on official government documents), wrote that in the early 1960s, senior U.S. military commanders planned subversive operations, including the implementation of terrorist operations in many American cities – in addition to hijacking planes and the sinking an American ship off Cuba’s Bay of Pigs. The plan, which was approved by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and planned with the help of the super-secret National Security Agency, stated: ‘If we execute these operations, the loss of (U.S.) life published in newspapers will spark a national wave of revulsion. That will help us a great deal.’ Now let’s see – what would Bamford have to say about the Fort Hood incident?”

By Saad Mehyo

Translated By Nicolas Dagher

November 9, 2009

United Arab Emirates – Dar Al Khaleej – Home Page (Arabic)
Is the Fort Hood shooting, in which the accused is an American-Muslim officer of Palestinian descent named Nidal Hasan, some astonishing hurricane that came out of a clear blue sky? Not at all. It was like a bolt of lightning that will come and go at the speed of light. America’s sky is as clear as ever.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, your most trusted translator and aggregator of foreign news and views about our nation.

  • Silhouette
    a conspiracy directed by the “extremist right-wing Jewish-American alliance,”
    **********
    Well the "black" part is right of the "black knights" inasmuch as the binding agent between those in the US who buddy around with Israelis is oil. Google the Haifa pipeline when you get a minute.

    "Blackwater"..etc. You gotta hand it to them. They're having fun with the vernacular right before our eyes..

    If it wasn't for the oil, 9/10s of the US side of that allegiance would have nothing to do with Israel. Most of the good old boys Stateside who pat their jewish buddies on the back during the day are fraternizing with quasi-nazi groups by night. This isn't news to those "jews" in power in israel. Money makes strange bedfellows indeed.





  • dduck12
    You ought to try a new bedfellow, one that could some sense in your head. And, don't respond by making some anti-Semitic remark, I am an agnostic and never was Jewish.
    BTW: A funny film, which you would squirm through is "A Serious Man". But then you would need a tolerant psyche and a sense a humor.
  • JSpencer
    dd, could be more clear about who you are responding to and why?
  • dduck12
    Ther was only one comment on this subject: Sil
  • JSpencer
    You could have been addressing Kern or one of the 4 links for all I know. Your post wasn't a direct reply - hence the request for clarity. I've learned not to assume anything when it comes to political forums.
  • Father_Time
    I'm trying to figure out what the heck the duck is offended at.
  • dduck12
    Really?
  • Father_Time
    Yeah. What?
  • dduck12
    At least you are not verbose (unusual for this forum). I found the references to Jews to be offensive even in the coached way they were portrayed and I did not like the the Nazi reference. Call me paranoid but I detected some underlying anti-semitisim.
  • JeffersonDavis
    You have to realize one important fact here, everyone.

    Arabs do not "hate" Jews, per se. I've lived among Sunnis and Shia. I have had long long talks on this very subject.

    The main problem here is perspective.
    The pan-Arab perspective: In 1948, Palestinians were illegally kicked out of their home and it was given to foreigners - Eurasian Jews.

    The Jewish/American perspective: Israel was created after Hitler innihalated 6 millions Jews and Palestine, after all, is the land promised to them by God.

    Now, I ask you. Which of those perspectives is pragmatic and which is not?

    It is my solemn opinion that the UN screwed up in 1948 by giving a group land which did not belong to them. Does that make me anti-semitic? No. This is a political issue, not one of ethnicity or faith.

    I'm not sure of the nuances in 1948 - I wasn't there. But I do know that kicking one group out of a nation and installing another is wrong.

    My point?
    The arabs/muslims have a legitimate gripe. Palestine has been the basis for just about every instance of terrorism. We will make no headway until it is addressed. This has been going on for over 60 years and did not begin on 9/11.















  • spirasol
    Most of what I read about the Jews is written by Jews. They write about the holocaust industry, victim consciousness, knee-jerk anti-semitism. I just read a very informative article which differentiates Zionism from Jewishness. Most of these authors are referred to defensively as "self-hating Jews." How can there be any dialog if any and every negative view of Israel is automatically redirected to the area of antisemitism. These are impossible conditions to have a discussion about anything.
  • dduck12
    Agreed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC