An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

NY 23 From the Horse’s Mouth

For those around the country who somehow thought that they understood the politics of New York’s 23 district (or, “The North Country” as we call it) and feel they had a grasp on how “awful” a choice Dede Scozzafava was, they should read this editorial from the local paper. Here’s one of the key portions, explaining just how she wound up as the nominee from what I fully admit is a flawed selection process.

North country Republican leaders could have tapped Scozzafava almost two years ago to be their candidate for the special election for the state Senate, but instead they chose Will Barclay. They learned too late that they had made a mistake when Barclay couldn’t get enough support in Jefferson and St. Lawrence counties, Scozzafava’s turf.

Some thought Scozzafava would bolt the party after that slight, but she stayed loyal. And when another special election came around, this time for Congress, she was rewarded in part for that loyalty. And while a lot of special interest groups declared she failed the litmus test to be a Congressional Republican, those who understand the dance in Northern New York — pro-union, pro-NRA, pro-choice, pro-military, etc. — knew she would appeal to that most precious of voting blocs: The one that gives you 51 percent.

Bloggers, commentators, outside agitators, etc. will put their Texas two-step spin on this election as to “what it really means.” Great! Let the dance begin!

But somebody somewhere should note that this sure-bet GOP district is now held by a Democrat because Republicans around the country somehow got it in their heads that to save a village you have to destroy it.

They’re an ornery bunch up there, and in the aftermath of the battle one of the most frequently heard comments seems to be a sense of bitterness over the intrusion of the national media and the demands of other types of Republicans from around the country trying to tell their voters what it means to be conservative. The results should have been predictable, I suppose.

Next year, I can almost guarantee you, things will go back to the status quo. The primary will produce another GOP candidate who would be totally “wishy washy” and unacceptable to Rush Limbaugh or Michelle Malkin, the voters will completely ignore the “wisdom” of the blogosphere and national media, and elect them like they always have. And maybe that’s how it’s supposed to be, eh?

  • HemmD
    The bottom line is simple, the tea bagging Purity of Essence crowd took a Republican seat held for 100 years and turned it into a Democratic one. That's change no one can believe in.

    Meanwhile, Bloomberg won in a city predominantly Democratic simply because he's been an effective mayor. I believe the same can be said about the two governor's races. Effectiveness, or the lack thereof, is what drives voting trends, not ideology.
  • DLS
    I'd still like to see something more intelligent than fixation on this race (and avoidance of the big Dem losses and GOP wins in New Jersey and in Virginia, especially) and the predictable leftist silliness.

    To what extent was it a resentment against outsiders' intrusion? A significant fraction of the voters still voted for Scozzafava even though she quit the contest. Exactly what kind of likely protest vote was this?
  • Rudi
    The primary will produce another GOP candidate who would be totally “wishy washy” and unacceptable to Rush Limbaugh or Michelle Malkin, the voters will completely ignore the “wisdom” of the blogosphere and national media, and elect them like they always have.

    When did this loving couple buy a summer home in Watertown. They're even bigger carpetbaggers than the Wingnut from Lake Placcid...
  • What Rudi said!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC