An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right
Steele: GOP “Transcendent”
Apparently the election last night showed that the GOP was transcendent, at least according to Michael Steele.
That’s what I’ve been saying for years! I’m glad that they finally agreed.
No word on when they are going to come back down to earth or aim for political ascendancy.
Update: I got a hold of some forthcoming book titles coming from the GOP:
- GOP House, 111th Congress: Representative Men (And A Couple Of Women Too)
- George W. Bush: Crawford
- Scooter Libby and Rush Limbaugh: Leaks of Crass
OK I’m done before they take away my posting rights.
opinions powered by SendLove.to
7 Responses to “Steele: GOP “Transcendent””
Steele is so irrelevant that no one is bothering to comment.
LOL! Thanks, that was good. Please feel free to continue.
Oh so it's Steele that is the issue? I thought it was more about the puns on allusions to 150 year old literature.
I was going to offer the stage to anyone that had their own additions so feel free.
It is a marketing problem. Remove Steele from your headline and watch the hits come in.
Well, many a lib and Dem mouthpiece has once again exposed their idiocy by making statements disparaging and denying what happened Tuesday. That is no surprise, pathetic as it is. Had they any more sense, they'd be concentrating more on the numbers and asking why the hard-core more-activist Obama-faithful voters failed to turn out as did the many who reflected the nation's concerns with the state of affairs in this country as well as how the Dems currently have been mismanaging things and otherwise misbehaving. (The far left, meanwhile, also admits in its own way the Dems — and Dem voters Tuesday, it may be — are incoherent and dysfunctional. The far left is impatient with the stalled “progress” in Washington. It was entertaining to listen to Ed Schultz scream about this.)
“I was going to offer the stage to anyone that had their own additions so feel free.”
The ghostwriters, who would probably be more interesting to note than the “authors,” remain anonymous.
Come to think of it, don't they choose to be anonymous these days, for GOP or conservative “authors”?
It's kind of like avoiding having Bush appear with you and endorse you at campaign appearances last year.