An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Marijuana Policy Shift & Its Consequences

marijuana_leaf.gif

This morning AP reported that the Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws. The NYTimes points to the three-page memo spelling out the policy, but I’m thinking Reason’s Jacob Sullum still believes there’s good reason for legit distributors to worry:

[T]he Drug Enforcement Administration can still participate in raids on medical marijuana dispensaries that local officials consider illegal. In Los Angeles County, as Brian Doherty noted a couple of weeks ago, that category includes pretty much every dispensary, since District Attorney Steve Cooley takes the position that state law does not permit over-the-counter sales. Officials in other jurisdictions hostile to medical marijuana, such as San Diego, can be expected to agree with that interpretation, even though it contradicts Attorney General Jerry Brown’s reading of the law. In recent months, the DEA has joined raids initiated by law enforcement officials in L.A. and San Diego. Until the law is clarified by the courts or the legislature, the federal government will have plenty of opportunities to interfere with the distribution of medical marijuana in California, even when it is going to bona fide patients.

Talk Left’s Jeralyn expects no boom in the medical dispensary business:

Given the increased willingness of the feds to allow dispensaries to operate if they are in compliance with state laws, it’s only natural that large numbers of people are going to be curious and want to learn more about opening a dispensary to see if it’s right for them. While the media and some law enforcement officials are trumping this into a near-explosion in the number of dispensaries opening in Colorado and elsewhere, I really don’t think 7 or 10 new dispensaries in any given area qualifies as an explosion, or as our Mr. Suthers said, “an opening of the floodgates. ”

It takes as much time and commitment to open and maintain a medical marijuana business as any other kind of business. I think the market for dispensaries will sort itself out without the need for moratoriums on granting licenses or new rules and regulations, particularly ones not authorized by voters or included in the authorizing legislation.

And to those of you tempted to joke about the policy shift, Andrew Sullivan asks that we all please get past the stoner humor:

Look, no one enjoyed Pineapple Express as much as I did, but this is a serious issue. It’s about Obama’s conservative restoration of federalism; and it’s about finding ways to help sick people manage their illness and pain in the most effective way possible. Boomers remember their college years and that’s the prism through which they see this. But it’s about basic freedoms, states’ rights, and humane treatment of the ill. What’s so hilarious about that?

He suggests that L.A.’s problem is that it liberalized too quickly and too irresponsibly.

Fourteen states allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

My friends at LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition) note another reason for celebration today, pointing to a Gallup poll finding U.S. support for legalizing marijuana at an all time high.

  • shannonlee
    Most LA dispensaries are not following California regulations. My hope is now that their only threat is country and city police, and only for not following regulations, they will shape up.
  • Ray
    No big surprise as Obama has long wanted to at least decriminalize pot.
  • After more than twenty-five years of senseless draconian drug war policies of the Reagan-Bush Sr.-Clinton-Bush Jr. administrations, finally the federal government is starting to move in the right direction.

    Americans are going to see that legalizing medical marijuana isn't going to be the disaster that the fearmongering drug warriors claim, and once that happens, hopefully the drug warrior propagandists will be marginalized, and the country can work toward repealing marijuana laws altogether.
  • kritt11
    Going after these patients is a waste of resources -- for the courts, the police and for our prison system. There is a finite amount of money available for the criminal justice system. I'd rather it was spent pursuing violent crime, than somebody in chronic pain who gets high to ameliorate it.
  • lewisbobby
    Being able to use marijuana in medical treatment is only the first step. Soon people will realize that it's not harmful if used with moderation. I'm sure the day will come when anyone will be able to buy legal buds from the supermarket or the pharmacy.
  • JeffersonDavis
    I agree that medically prescribed marijuana is identical to medically prescribed morphine. Both are illegal on the open market.

    I've always felt that if beer is legal, then pot should also be legal. Perhaps that's the libertarian in me coming out - but it's fair.
  • DLS
    I just hope too many fools don't overreact to this. There's need for reform of the Drug War (and for corrections, as I've said before -- which is not limited to drug crime excesses), but that doesn't mean there "need" [sic] be anarchism (nor that the more childish pro-druggies get too excited by Obama's lib-Dem measure -- could just be one of a number of little cuts to come to rationalize paying for health care "reform" and other spending on other things instead of prosecuting drug crimes). You'll have to wait and see how the state and local governments respond to this, first and foremost. And what about the remaining, and more important, details about federal drug laws, crimes, and enforcement?

    Medical marijuana and related activism is just a "front" for legalization, and people involved in this would be more respectable as well as grown-up and intelligent if they went straight and fully toward the real goal, which is decriminalization or at least substantial revision of marijuana laws. (No, not all drugs are the same and can be expected to be treated the same, not in the real world.)
  • DLS
    "I've always felt that if beer is legal, then pot should also be legal."

    It's not just the libertarian mainstream-American position here ("libertarian" being an abused word!) that is the issue, but practicality. Marijuana is arguably less harmful than alcohol, and that should affect how it is treated. The alcohol model is certainly a model to begin to use for reform, though it might obviously be treated differently, since it is a different drug. The real-world curiosity will be not if it may be available to adults someday (restrictions similar to alcohol, which is sensible), but if or when it will become legal to grow (and harvest) the plants someday, which makes sense to me (and appeals to me) as a gardener, in particular.
  • DLS
    "I'd rather it was spent pursuing violent crime"

    Agreed. Jail is a waste of resources as well as time for people who really don't belong there and so don't merit the expense and effort (and loss of employment and all the rest).

    Related to this is reform of other things specifically with drug crimes and notably with marijuana, not only the laws prohibiting growing the plants ("manufacturing a controlled substance") but related abuse, first and foremost being civil asset forfeiture (seizures = legalized government plunder or robbery).
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC