An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

“Obama is Intellectual but Incompetent,” Gore Vidal

Gore Vidal

Gore Vidal, 83, described as America’s greatest essayist and one of its best-selling novelists, says he has in his life “crashed many barriers.” Vidal’s brutal manner of criticism hasn’t waned. The United States of America, he says, is a “madhouse” and its President is “overwhelmed” and “incompetent”.

Last year he famously switched allegiance from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama during the Democratic nomination process for president. Now, he reveals, he regrets his change of heart, says The Independent.

In Vidal’s words: “I was like everyone else when Obama was elected – optimistic. Everything we had been saying about racial integration was vindicated. But he’s incompetent. He will be defeated for re-election. It’s a pity because he’s the first intellectual president we’ve had in many years, but he can’t hack it. He’s not up to it. He’s overwhelmed.

“And who wouldn’t be? The United States is a madhouse. The country should be put away – and we’re being told to go away. Nothing makes any sense. The President wants to be liked by everybody, and he thought all he had to do was talk reason. But remember – the Republican Party is not a political party. It’s a mindset, like Hitler Youth. It’s full of hatred. You’re not going to get them aboard. Don’t even try. The only way to handle them is to terrify them. He’s too delicate for that.

“Obama is doing dreadfully. I was hopeful. He was the most intelligent person we’ve had in that position for a long time. But he’s inexperienced. He has a total inability to understand military matters. He’s acting as if Afghanistan is the magic talisman: solve that and you solve terrorism.

“America should leave Afghanistan. We’ve failed in every other aspect of our effort of conquering the Middle East or whatever you want to call it. The ‘War on Terror’ was ‘made up’, Vidal says. ‘The whole thing was PR, just like ‘weapons of mass destruction’. It has wrecked the airline business, which my father founded in the 1930s. He’d be cutting his wrists. Now when you fly you’re both scared to death and bored to death, a most disagreeable combination.”

Click here to read more…

In the 1970s, when I worked as journalist in Saudi Arabia an average person on the street would describe the USA as “Shaitan” (or devil). When asked to explain why so, the Saudis were not quite articulate. But in general terms they described the collapse of family life, basic value system and ruthless materialism as signs when devils take over.

Saudis would have found their thoughts articulated better by Vidal. “Gore Vidal is not only grieving for his own dead circle and his fading life, but for his country. At 83, he has lived through one third of the lifespan of the United States. If anyone incarnates the American century that has ended, it is him. He was America’s greatest essayist, one of its best-selling novelists and the wit at every party.

“He holidayed with the Kennedys, cruised for men with Tennessee Williams, was urged to run for Congress by Eleanor Roosevelt, co-wrote some of the most iconic Hollywood films, damned US foreign policy from within, sued Truman Capote, got fellated by Jack Kerouac, watched his cousin Al Gore get elected President and still lose the White House, and – finally, bizarrely – befriended and championed the Oklahoma bomber, Timothy McVeigh.

“Yet now, he says, it is clear the American experiment has been ‘a failure’. It was all for nothing. Soon the country will be ranked ’somewhere between Brazil and Argentina, where it belongs.’ The Empire will collapse militarily in Afghanistan; the nation will collapse internally when Obama is broken ‘by the madhouse’ and the Chinese call in the country’s debts.

“A ruined United States will then be ‘the Yellow Man’s Burden’, and ‘they’ll have us running the coolie cars, or whatever it is they have in the way of transport’.”

To read the complete article please click here…

  • JeffersonDavis
    First he says: "America should leave Afghanistan. We’ve failed in every other aspect of our effort..."
    Then he says: "The Empire will collapse militarily in Afghanistan."

    Kind of a self-fulfilling prophesy? We should leave Afghanistan - our "Empire" will collapse militarily in Afghanistan. Typical liberal nonsense.

    He is correct in one thing. If our "empire" collapses, the Chinese are the next ones in line.
    Sounds to me like we should get our act together, don't ya think?
    I'd much rather try to change our "empire" for the better, than to ever live under a Chinese one.

    Think about it.
  • redbus
    There is an inherent tension between fiscal responsibility at the federal level on the one hand, and the insistence by constituents that their Congressional representatives "bring home the bacon" on the other hand. So our national debt is climbing to outrageous proportions. This will be the biggest topic in the next Presidential election. Mr. Obama needs to take a page from former President Clinton and be a fiscal hawk. Unfortunately, we've seen just the opposite, and if he loses the next election - as Mr Gore in his essay seems to think he will - it will primarily be over this issue. Afghanistan and Iran, as important as those are, will play second fiddle.
  • Don Quijote
    First he says: "America should leave Afghanistan. We’ve failed in every other aspect of our effort..."
    Then he says: "The Empire will collapse militarily in Afghanistan."


    If the US leaves today, it's prestige will take a real beating, if it leaves 10 years from now the same way it left Vietnam, it will not only be only its prestige that will have taken a beating, but its economy and its military. It cannot afford to piss away a few trillions in the sands of Afghanistan...
    And if somehow we manage to win in Afghanistan after having spent half a trillion or more, what will we have won? Is there any realistic way that this war could pay for itself?


    I'd much rather try to change our "empire" for the better, than to ever live under a Chinese one.


    Good Luck...
    We are unable to do something as simple as studying other country's health-care systems, seeing what works and duplicating and integrating the good features of these health-care systems into ours, despite the fact that our health-care cost twice as much with underwhelming outcomes.

    Our financial elites are unable to think any further than the next quarter, our politicians are unable to think beyond the next election cycle, and our mass-media is no more that the propaganda outlet of Corporate America. Unless we can change those three things, and the elites that run these three sectors of our society, we are doomed...
  • But remember – the Republican Party is not a political party. It’s a mindset, like Hitler Youth. It’s full of hatred. You’re not going to get them aboard. Don’t even try. The only way to handle them is to terrify them. He’s too delicate for that.


    So basically President Obama has to become a dictator and "terrify" the political opposition? Sorry Mr. Vidal. That is the province of dictators. And we're not going to roll in that area.
  • Don Quijote
    So basically President Obama has to become a dictator and "terrify" the political opposition? Sorry Mr. Vidal. That is the province of dictators. And we're not going to roll in that area.


    All he should do is play the game the same way the republicans do... Winner take all, no mercy... when they are down, kick them...

    In legislative terms, what it boils down to is this:

    Get the Democrats in a room, have them hash out their differences, write a bill and take it to the floor. Once on the floor, a straight party vote, any democrat who votes against the party for any other than pre-agreed conditions loses the support of the party and is 100% guaranteed to have a nasty primary that will either get them thrown out of office by the Democrat in the Primary or by the Republican in the General Election. If any media outlet shows pro-republican bias, you don't go on it, you cut their access to the President and his Administration, you make sure that your supporters in the media get all the goodies (Interview with the President, Off the record briefings, etc...). If they break your trust, you freeze them out.

    This is politics, you reward your friends, you punish your enemies. Obama isn't willing to do that, he believes that if you talk to the Republicans and offer good logical arguments they will see the errors of their ways and compromise, so far they haven't and I seriously doubt that they will anytime in the foreseeable future.
  • JeffersonDavis
    I am fully aware of the possibility of another Vietnam, Don.
    These quickest and easiest route to that outcome is to politically shanghai it as was done in Vietnam. If Obama puts more troops in with a clear strategy and goal, then God bless him - well done. If he changes strategy and pulls the troops - then God bless him - well done. If he puts his thumb in his rear end and thinks of the reelection ramifications while people die and the mission fails - then shame on him.

    You stated: "We are unable to do something as simple as studying other country's health-care systems, seeing what works and duplicating and integrating the good features of these health-care systems into ours".

    Ok great. But the partisans in DC are unwilling to at least TRY to regulate the industries that grease their wallets - namely insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and tort/trial lawyers.
    Would you at least agree to try to regulate the crap out of those first? If that doesn't work, THEN go ahead and do the single payer. If you were to offer that option in a poll, I'm sure it would be overwhelmingly supportive of the regulation first.

    And in response to your proposed legislative action for the democrats:
    That is the quickest way to lose control of the Senate, and lose seats in the house. I'm a democrat, and my own representatives are going against our wishes in our state. They will feel some pain next year for it. If they want to hop in Obama's pocket and ignore their constituents, then they can do it as lobbyists, but they will not do it as my representatives if I have anything to say about it.
  • HemmD
    It appears all who have commented here haven't taken the time to consider the disengenuous nature of Vidal's "quotes." Consider that this man has made his living by pricking the inflated egos of individuals as well as the American people. His novel "Burr," a ficticious account of the founding fathers as related by our almost 2nd president, Arron Burr, is a case in point When it came out, the furor it caused was due to his portayals of Jefferson and Hamiliton as rabid egotists and fools.

    Vidal debated William F Buckley over the US constitution on Jack Paar's show in 1968, and he so infuriated Buckley by his comments that Bill called him a "queer" on national TV. Vidal's is an intellectual Don Rickles, he insults and negates everybody. That's his shtick. His political/philosophic beliefs are secondary to his acerbic personality.

    Careful reading of the interview also shows the man pretends to have no inner reflection, or at least, he wishes you to believe that. Exposing his own foibles would be far too dangerous to such a man. He puts on a front of outward acid criticism and icy internal remoteness.

    My point in all this is simple. Gore Vidal likes no one publicly, and sees every one and everything as part of the "mad house" he has made the point of his wit. What he believes about Obama or Afghanistan is pretty useless in the real world. Having said this, however, consider reading "Burr." His story may have been the first to show the founding fathers in a more realistic way than the usual Hollywood version of early America. Besides, much of the story is based upon facts gleaned from letters, newspapers, and personal accounts from the period.
  • Father_Time
    President Obama is NOT incompetent. He is just getting his sea legs.

    This bitter old fart, (Vida who Gore what?), has simply lost his mojo. Besides his writing was always stodgy, cobwebbed, clabber anyway.
  • PWT
    President Obama is NOT incompetent.

    Maybe he can state that in a press conference, nobody watches them anymore anyway, since that formulation worked so well for Nixon.
  • shannonlee
    Vidal is just an angry old man. He voted for Obama to see certain things happen and they haven't happened. Like a lot of liberals, Vidal isn't getting what he wants from the President and is throwing a pity party. Someone get this guy a crying towel...booohooo.

    Vidal needs to understand that Obama is not incompetent. Obama is intelligent. This intelligence tells him that certain policies that liberals dislike must stay in place for the time being.

    I was amazed at how quickly Clinton supporters turned their backs on her and jumped on the Obama bandwagon...now those same people are turning on Obama. Pathetic.
  • Father_Time
    Correction; Republicans don't watch them, but Republicans stopped mattering a year ago anyway so nobody that maters….cares.
  • tidbits
    HemmD -

    Agree with your comment. Before there was an Ann Coulter, Gore Vidal was her liberal counterpart, say or do the most outrageous thing possible to keep your name in the spotlight and your book sales up.
  • DLS
    I wonder to what extent Vidal's gripes are related to current desperation and far-left impatience about health care "reform" or lack of other pet far-left causes that are less important and are being given less priority (along with joining everything else as being affected also by, yes, some incompetence or lib-kids' ineptitude, "playing government" and "playing nation" since the stimulus at the start of the year), such as gays-in-the-military or gay marriage (in Vidal's case) or other farther-left relative trivia.
  • Don Quijote
    Before there was an Ann Coulter, Gore Vidal was her liberal counterpart,

    Bullsh*t, fifty years from now people will still be reading Gore Vidal, how many will remember who Ann Coulter is?
  • superdestroyer
    DQ,

    The last thing that the Democrats are going to do is play winner take all because that means that the Democrats have to take responsibility for the outcomes of their policies. That is the last thing that the liberal, progressive culture will do. Do you really think that the party made up of lawyers, government employees, minorities, and academics will ever accept responsibility for anything. I doubt it.

    The Democrats would rather now have a policy rather than take responsibility. Look at how all of the progressive blogger keep posting constantly about an irrelevant Republican Party instead of holding any Democrat accountable for anything.

    When you are the political party of nitpickers (like Ivy league trained lawyers) then do not expect to be the party of decisive policy decisions.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC