An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Why We’re Going To Bail Out the Banks Again

Here we go again. Yves Smith links to a WSJ article that highlights how banks are not saving nearly as much as they should be for expected losses in the commercial real estate sector, assets that could lose $1-$2 trillion.

Calculatedrisk has a series of posts that hammer the point home: up to 20% of all hotels defaulting (with a larger percentage of the debt defaulting), apartment prices falling and leading to record defaults, and office complexes suffering the same fate.

This is in addition to the triple whammy about to befall residential real estate, where the tax credit ends, the Fed slows purchases of the securities and the largest wave to date of foreclosures hits the market (up to 7 million).

In spite of all this, the banks are setting aside few loss reserves in order to boost their profits (and thus bonuses) and share prices to issue more stock. They are counting on the government to continue to funnel them money when it’s needed, and it’s setting up another high stakes game of chicken.

All of this is why one of the people that foresaw the crisis predicts a “bloodbath” in the latter part of the year. This view is being increasingly shared by the small group that warned about it last year (and who were given some credit for the stock rally when they predicted one last spring based on government favoritism towards the banks).

  • DLS
    Oh, certainly the problems have far from ended. And (here comes the cynicism!) the little episode of the federal government and the big banks managing a consolidation of the banking industry has yet to be completed.
  • DLS
    Cynical postscript: But it's still not assured yet if or when the "properly managed ideal inflation" starts.
  • shannonlee
    Yes, there have been rumblings about the commercial real estate market for a while now. Also a new batch of home foreclosures are looming. Funny how this important news doesn't get much play in the MSM.

    Here is the thing...why should banks set aside money? They know we will bail them out. As long as they are too big to fail...why should they behave? We gave them all of that money...with very little new regulation...plain stupid.

    When are we going to place strict regulations on these guys?

    Money for nothing and your chicks for free.
  • mikkel
    Exactly, they have zero incentive to do anything because it's been shown they can get away with everything.
  • DLS
    "When are we going to place strict regulations on these guys?"

    There's certainly no need to go beyond that and to demand they be taken over by government (notably by the federal government) or be viewed as a "public utility," as some extremists do; but there is an overdue need for regulation reform (real reform, real regulation), and certainly an end to what isn't only moral hazard in the most blatant sense, but an ugly plundering of us, the peasantry.
  • shannonlee
    Preach it...

    I heard that Sachs is going to get paid 1 billion in tax payer money when CIT fails. CIT owes us 2 billion. How did this happen? I bet Paulson knows....
  • JeffersonDavis
    I agree with you, Shannon.
    Alexander Hamilton would be pleased, as it looks like we're heading for another First Bank of the United States.

    And it's odd you said "Money for nothing and your chicks for free".
    I had just heard that song prior to reading your post.

    SPOOOOOOOKY!
  • StockBoySF
    My comment: see Mikkel's entire post. :)
  • DLS
    "How did this happen? I bet Paulson knows...."

    A lot can be aimed at ObamaCo, but that's not where it began, obviously. I still remember driving across lower Michigan during the campaign-season bailout "crisis" week, late one night, and heard another part of the answer to your question on a talk radio program. It had to do with the first bailout bill failure and then another bill that was passed after, ahem, "sweeteners" were added to the legislation.

    The remark I heard: "Now we know what the price of a Congressional vote is. grrrrr"
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC