An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama Overexposed? CNN Poll Says No

69280_600.jpg

In the course of two days, President Barack Obama appeared on a slew of network Sunday interview programs and on Late Night With David Letterman — begging the question of whether a network would soon offer him his own daily show (bet it won’t be Fox). And raising the issue among TV-cable talking heads, new media pundits, talk show hosts and bloggers: Is Obama overexposing himself?

A NBC/Wall Street Journal poll finds the answer is “NO” and it boils down to this:

If you voted for Barack Obama, you have no problem seeing him and might even want to see more of them.

If you voted against Barack Obama you want to see less of him and think he is overexposed.

Of course the poll doesn’t include the mainstream media — which as part of its job looks for issues or possible issues to discuss. This poll suggests that it’s a possible issue that isn’t.

And the poll doesn’t include conservative talkers or anti-Obama bloggers, who will raise any issue if it seems to be a potentially negative one about Obama, due to their own political prisms (we all have them — even centrists).

But the poll’s findings are quite clear:

Fifty-four percent of people questioned in an NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey say they’re seeing the right amount of Obama, with 34 percent saying they see and hear too much of the president and 9 percent suggesting they don’t hear enough from the president .

The poll, released Tuesday night, also indicates a partisan divide on the question, with 63 percent of respondents who voted for Republican John McCain in last year’s presidential election saying they’re seeing too much of the president, with only eight percent of people who voted for Obama feeling the same way.

According to the survey, 52 percent of independents believe Obama’s exposure is OK and 40 percent say it’s too much.

But the poll is unlikely to change the minds of those who feel is he overexposed. He is to them (but then he was during the campaign as well).

The key to watch will be the independents, which several polls show Obama as starting to lose. Obama still seems to be someone who wears well with a larger number of Americans, which means they’ll be open to listening to what he says. The danger for Obama: if the people who voted for him start feeling they’ve overdosed on seeing him on TV, on You Tubes, on late night comedy shows or maybe even day on Oprah or Judge Judy (suing the birthers?) he will become background noise.

This poll shows he is not at that stage. Yet.

  • Leonidas
    The survey was conducted by telephone with 1,005 adult Americans.

    Wonder what the average number of times those polled have seen Obama speak? I mean if you are not watching him you likely will not be overexpossed will you?

    Until that poll can answer that question, doesn't really say a whole lot.
  • Father_Time
    Its better he speaks for himself rather than the corporate media mouthpieces.

    Besides, would you rather see and hear Palin everyday?
  • tidbits
    The real issue is why we are continually distracted by these side show issues like "over-exposure" to the detriment of substance. A few examples if I may.

    1. Prior to the summer recess, Obama held a press conference. In it he displayed, in my opinion, a generally weak understanding of the health care debate taking place in Congress. Result - we, as a nation, spent the next week or longer talking about the cop and the professor, culminating with a Rose Garden beer toast.

    2. During Obama's recent address to the joint session Obama endorsed some very controversial aspects of health care including mandates (contrary to his campaign promise) and public option. For more than a week after the speech we heard only two words spoken that evening, and not by Obama, "You lie."

    3. This past weekend Obama appeared on numerous television shows. During one he exposed a lack of knowledge on the substance of one of the bills moving through Congress, specifically whether it included a tax. So what do we hear about? That he snubbed Fox and whether or not he is over-exposed.

    The obsession with the carnival sideshow may attract eyeballs and ears for media marketing purposes but it does not advance the debate. It isn't about long form birth certificates or teleprompters or rude congressmen or tv time. It's about substance, and that is being pushed to the background for newsertainment purposes.

    Final point. One reason I like TMV is that one can choose to be educated and comment on substance or float to a side issue from time to time. Both are available. Many other sites, and much of the media, are carnival sideshow all the time.









  • jonimp9
    Leonidas,
    Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?

    I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure.

    It's a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.
  • sparkles43
    I am amazed that people think our president can be over-exposed. We should respect any time our president speaks to the people of our nation. It is especially important when the issue is as vital as health care reform. If President Obama wasn't campaigning for health care reform, the media would be complaining he isn't doing enough. IMO the media should report the news and quit being tabloid reporters.
  • DLS
    Of course he is over-exposed, and he is bringing his campaign circus on the television circuit because he and the Dems have put themselves into a desperate position currently with health care reform.

    Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic.
  • The political landscape has changed. With the "24 hour news cycle" and the extremely mouthy opposition of the likes of Beck, O'Really, Limbaugh and Hannity, plus the non-'media' mouthpieces Steele, Cheney and Palin, the public is deluged with opinion and "analysis". If the president wants to even the score, he's the best advocate for his own vision. Plus, unlike Bush who feared exposure for good reason, Obama is likable and smart and pretty darn conversant with the English language.

    And as tidbits says, the focus keeps wandering off into the sideshow.
  • roro80
    It's possible that those who think he's overexposed either don't like him or just aren't interested in politics. I can imagine that if you really enjoy seeing celebrities being pretty and funny on Letterman, listening to politics all night on Letterman was probably annoying. I generally enjoy politics, and I personally want to know what's going on from the Pres's point of view, so I don't think he's overexposed. I also think GreenDreams' assessment that a political climate where analysts spend 24 hours a day talking politics, where our politicians have become celebrity gossip makers, and where so many people spend their days in front of a computer or TV -- this sort of climate is conducive to having more direct interaction with the executive in charge.
  • Leonidas
    Leonidas,
    Are you implying that the number of appearances that these 1000 people have seen is significantly different than what the average American has seen?

    I somehow doubt that average Americans take the time to watch every single appearance and speech and press release put out by the administration. However, the Media does have that opportunity which is probably why (along with the demands of a 24 hour news program) they are talking about overexposure.

    It's a case of the media making the story instead of reporting the story.


    No I'm not implying that these folk have seen more or less of him than the average American, I'm simply wondering how many times they have actually watched him. If they aren't watching him overexposure isn't an issue, at least unless they are peeved at him for interrupting their favorite programs.
  • VeratheGun
    "Scraping the barrel bottom again to try to deny reality only makes people look even more pathetic."

    How prescient! I feel the same way about many of the regular posters around here.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC