An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Sabato’s Crystal Ball – RED DAWN: GOP REVIVAL FOR 2010 HOUSE?

sabato_crystal_ball.gif

Isaac T. Wood and Larry J. Sabato: RED DAWN: GOP REVIVAL FOR 2010 HOUSE? Republicans will pick up substantially, but fall short of full control

While the next slate of House elections does not occur until 2010, congressmen and their challengers certainly don’t take off the “off-year.” Instead, this year is a crucial one for the parties who must prove their recruiting chops, for the incumbents who seek big fundraising numbers and positive headlines, and for the challengers who have to prove their ability to take down a sitting member of Congress. And that doesn’t even include the open races, 18 so far, where incumbents have announced they will not seek reelection. In those districts, both parties are scrambling to find candidates who can quash takeover hopes or, conversely, take advantage of this rare opportunity.

Generally speaking, the president’s party loses seats in midterm elections, as the Crystal Ball discussed in May. The actions of the president, even more than that of the Congress itself, shape the mood of the electorate and can help determine the magnitude of this legislative loss. The other main determinant of the potential for losses and gains is the national playing field. After picking up a net total of 54 House seats in the past four years, Democrats will be defending a lot of Republican Red turf. All told, 49 Democratic House members sit in districts which voted for Republican presidential candidate John McCain last November, while only 34 Republican congressmen sit in districts won by President Obama. Given the magnitude of Obama’s victory, these numbers understate the problem Democrats face, since some normally Republican districts were swept along in the Obama tide, but will likely return to their GOP roots in 2010 (and possibly in 2012, too).

MORE:

ALSO: Isaac T. Wood asks, “Is the GOP on the cusp of another 1994?”

  • daveinboca
    It's too early to tell whether the very gerrymandered House of Rep. will be susceptible to more than around forty, which would leave the GOP a dozen or so seats short. Nancy Pelosi is driving her own numbers into single digits [with even SNL doing her downside with Kristen Wiig]. But the key will be the actions of the president, and both Carter in '78 & Clinton in '94 suffered hugely because of huge mood swings caused by a disillusioned electorate. And Obama is losing the glow and some would even say hemorrhaging blood with multiple wounds, many of them self-inflicted.
  • JeffersonDavis
    Very good synopsis, Dave.
    The biggest battleground, of course, will be in the "purple" states. The blue areas, like Pelosi's, will be pretty much a shoe-in for the incumbant (no matter how low her numbers are). Likewise, the red areas will most likely do nothing but gain House seats for the GOP.
    It will be very intersting to see what happens in the land of purple.
  • Leonidas
    Thanks God for the purple States, and purple districts without them we'd be locked into permanent Gerrymandered stasis.
  • DLS
    I've never believed anyone who has anticipated another 1994. The lib Dems have been repellent, but the GOP still isn't presenting a viable alternative.
  • Jim_Satterfield
    Sabato's article was, of course, written before the display at Obama's speech.
  • shannonlee
    "but the GOP still isn't presenting a viable alternative."
    "Sabato's article was, of course, written before the display at Obama's speech."

    exactly!

    We won't see as much movement as "usual" for a midterm election because the Rep party is still so very much out of favor with the American pubic. Yes, Dem and Obama numbers are down, but Rep numbers are below freezing.

    As long as Reps like Wilson keep popping off at the worst possible time, Dems don't have much to worry about.

    I mean really...Rangel should be in jail for tax evasion, but Wilson is the major topic of discussion.








  • Holly_in_Cincinnati
    The Sabato & Wood articles were published AFTER Rep. Wilson's outburst, although they may have been written earlier.
  • casualobserver
    Words are too cheap.......cash pool anyone?
  • Jim_Satterfield
    I realized that, Holly. Given the timing of the publication I had to believe that they were written before the speech and outburst.
  • DLS
    There's no need to hype Wilson any longer, nor mischaraterize the GOP and the public merely by putting Wilson and other GOP show elements during Obama's address into the correct context that I listed earlier ("town hall excesses"). These displays simply were pathetic (not outrageous, not the near-equivalent of an assassination attempt, etc.) and illustrate that the GOP is negligeable currently. (They certainly were not in 1994, nor afterward, as the beet-faced Democrats bellowing "extremists!" proved.)

    The Dems are the epitome of corruption and worse, and the lib Dems are repellent to sane Americans, but the GOP is providing nothing as an alternative. This is not going to be another 1994.

    Now what will be "interesting" next year is sliminess with slime like ACORN and Census Dem mischief, followed by redistricting and related mischief, chief Dem staple stuff. That also works against the GOP.
  • DLS
    "cash pool anyone"

    Too painful. Smart money is on the Dems.
  • DLS
    The easiest "purple states" map to view is this one:

    http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/20...
  • TheMagicalSkyFather
    In the latest poll Wilson is now behind, he just moved from a safe district to an election challenge.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC