An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

More From Bruce Bartlett

Literally as I was posting the excerpt from Bruce Bartlett on The GOP’s Misplaced Rage, Steve Benen quoted Bartlett from an email conversation:

I believe that political parties should do penance for their mistakes and just losing power is not enough. Part of that involves understanding why those mistakes were made and how to prevent them from happening again. Republicans, however, have done no penance. They just pretend that they did nothing wrong. But until they do penance they don’t deserve any credibility and should be ignored until they do. That’s what my attacks on Bush are all about. I want Republicans to admit they were wrong about him, accept blame for his mistakes, and take some meaningful action to keep them from happening again. Bush should be treated as a pariah, as Richard Nixon was for many years until he rebuilt his credibility by more or less coming clean about Watergate with David Frost and writing a number of thoughtful books.

One reason this isn’t happening is because the media don’t treat Republicans as if they are discredited. On the contrary, they often seem to be treated as if they have more credibility than the administration. Just look at the silly issue of death panels. The media should have laughed it out the window, ridiculed it or at least ignored it once it was determined that there was no basis to the charge. Instead, those making the most outlandish charges are treated with deference and respect, while those that actually have credibility on the subject are treated as equals at best and often with deep skepticism, as if they are the ones with an ax to grind.

Says Benen:

I find this overwhelmingly persuasive. Bush/Cheney policies failed so spectacularly, Republican candidates and officeholders are generally reluctant to associate themselves with the tarnished name of the previous administration. But Bush/Cheney policies are still those of the contemporary Republican Party. Nothing has changed. Failure and defeat haven’t chastened the GOP at all, and if given a chance to govern again, Republican leaders are quite anxious to return to the exact same agenda they embraced when they were in the majority.

And the political mainstream seems to think this is sane.



7 Responses to “More From Bruce Bartlett”

  1. Kastanj says:

    Which is why reform needs to happen. If no one is willing to chastise the republicans, then its up to the democrats to punish them for their reliance on identity politics, fear-based argumentation, a fact-loathing approach to issues and cramping partisanship.

  2. Rudi says:

    Bartlett, Larison and Bacevich are voices of reason, and can be an enjoyable read even for a liberal. But the likes of Monica Crowley, Buchanan's, Ann Coulter and Tucker CVarlson are the MSM pundits from the Right…

  3. superdestroyer says:

    The problem with Mr. Brenen is that is believes the opposite of Mr. Bartlett. Mr. Brenen wants the Republican Party to double down on the failures of the Bush Administration by supporting more entitlements, more spending, more regulations, more immigration, more nanny state programs, more international adventures. Whereas people like Mr. Bartlett and Mr. Larison are for smaller govenrment and isolationism.

    I find it odd that everuyone of the left is quoting Mr. Barlett but reaching the opposite conclusion.

  4. DaGoat says:

    I don't agree with SD very often but this time I do – Democrats are picking and choosing what to take out of Bartlett's article. Bartlett is saying Bush failed largely because he didn't support supply-side economics, smaller government and control of pork barrel spending. In short, Bush failed partially because he was acting like a Democrat.

  5. GeorgeSorwell says:

    It seems to that this is main point of Bartlett's article:

    Finally, conservatives have an absurdly unjustified view that Republicans have a better record on federal finances. It is well-known that Clinton left office with a budget surplus and Bush left with the largest deficit in history. Less well-known is Clinton’s cutting of spending on his watch, reducing federal outlays from 22.1 percent of GDP to 18.4 percent of GDP. Bush, by contrast, increased spending to 20.9 percent of GDP. Clinton abolished a federal entitlement program, Welfare, for the first time in American history, while Bush established a new one for prescription drugs.

    Conservatives delude themselves that the Bush tax cuts worked and that the best medicine for America’s economic woes is more tax cuts; at a minimum, any tax increase would be economic poison. They forget that Ronald Reagan worked hard to pass one of the largest tax increases in American history in September 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, even though the nation was still in a recession that didn’t end until November of that year. Indeed, one could easily argue that the enactment of that legislation was a critical prerequisite to recovery because it led to a decline in interest rates. The same could be said of Clinton’s 1993 tax increase, which many conservatives predicted would cause a recession but led to one of the biggest economic booms in history.

    According to the CBO, federal taxes will amount to just 15.5 percent of GDP this year. That’s 2.2 percent of GDP less than last year, 3.3 percent less than in 2007, and 1.8 percent less than the lowest percentage recorded during the Reagan years. If conservatives really believe their own rhetoric, they should be congratulating Obama for being one of the greatest tax cutters in history.

  6. [...] More From Bruce Bartlett | The Moderate Voice By JOE WINDISH, Technology Editor Mr. Brenen wants the Republican Party to double down on the failures of the Bush Administration by supporting more entitlements, more spending, more regulations, more immigration, more nanny state programs, more international adventures … The Moderate Voice – http://themoderatevoice.com/ [...]

  7. Leonidas says:

    Lets face it, the best governments for this nation have been divided ones, neither party can or should be trusted to run it on its own. Next election I'm taking my moderate hat off and voting against my Democratic Congressman who I've supported the last 4 elections and will vote for Attila the Hun if he ran against him. The Democrats promised change when they took over Congress but all we are seeing is Nancy Pelosi using Tom Delay tactics. Until the Democratic monopoly is broken on federal power, picking the best candidate for the job is out the window.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity