An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Those Town Halls — Ouch!

Several weeks ago, about 425 active and retired employees of The San Diego Union-Tribune were asked in an email newsletter they publish what they would do if they were dictator for a day. Naturally, most of the replies were humorous. Allow me to don the imperial crown for a moment.

I would tell the demonstrators disrupting town hall meetings with their elected representatives on the proposed health care reform legislation to shut the you-know-what up and stop acting like unruly Third World agitators. A grown-up needs to step in and take charge of these unruly events and restore a sense of civility.

Ain’t gonna happen. I’ll tell you why.

The debate has evolved into a confluence of diametrically opposed political and economic positions in regards to delivering our health care. It is the new mother of hot button issues surpassing all others including the most important one of all — jobs.

Its foundation is the simple premise that health care represents 16% of our nation’s gross national product and escalating at an alarming rate while delivering poorer results compared to other industrialized countries.

Most polls show people overwhelmingly favor heath care and insurance reform. The devil is in the details.

That’s the first problem. Congress before its summer recess drafted several bills with President Obama sitting on the sidelines offering only broad principles of what he wants, yet he is the guy ramrodding the legislation as part of his signature change agenda. As House and Senators return to their home districts this August to hold their traditional town hall meetings, they are forced to defend or deflate a bunch of proposals that no where near are close to become law. As a result, their minions are acting like dogs barking, jumping and snapping at imaginary buzzing flies.

The second problem is the Congressional Democrats. The liberals and moderates are divided over the basic Old Democratic platform for universal health care delivered by a single-payer or public option plan that would compete with the private insurance carriers. The wedge dividing the groups include TV ads by liberal interests such as MoveOn.Org targeted at several key “Blue Dog” Democrats.

Problem No. Three is opposition to all the reform plans offered by Democrats from the Republicans and their vocal and influential talk radio, television and websites. Lobby groups representing health industry moguls not only have donated big bucks to both Democrats and Republicans but have paid for smear campaigns urging people to attend the town hall meetings for the sole purpose of disruption and creating chaos.

American politics have always carried rowdy overtones. The difference in today’s world is television, the Internet, YouTube and Twitter. The constant repetition of showing film clips of unruly town hall events no matter how exaggerated eventually imbeds in the public awareness a belief that something is wrong. And the wrong in this case translates in favor of those who oppose health reforms.

Of all the arguments cited at the town hall meetings, only one resonates with an element of legitimate concern. That is the cost to implement the reforms at a time the federal budget is $1.3 trillion overdrawn and the Chinese holding the pink slip to our national debt.

Most of the other arguments are based on lies and fears fed by rabble rousers on both sides of the issue.

The Republicans certainly outflanked and outsmarted the Democrats in taking their propaganda battles to the town halls. An emergency meeting at the White House developed this strategy among the Democrats: “If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard.”

We don’t need another arsonist. We need a grown-up to take charge.

The New York Times offers this round-up on the shenanigans.

  • SteveK
    Phooey!
  • StockBoySF
    "That’s the first problem. Congress before its summer recess drafted several bills with President Obama sitting on the sidelines offering only broad principles of what he wants, yet he is the guy ramrodding the legislation as part of his signature change agenda."

    I think Obama should only offer broad outlines and principles (this was a key issue he campaigned on and people voted him in). He should then let the legislators do their job- write legislation. And that legislation should be a result of bipartisan input. The problem is that the Republicans don't want Obama to succeed and want to use healthcare to "bring him down." The Republicans are sore losers and will use extremist tactics, to get their way. Despite the vote by the American people.

    Yes, there may be a difference of opinion on the details.. but the Republicans can have input, if they want.
  • Kastanj
    The thing is that the division between "regular" democrats and blue dogs is not a division reflecting any political or lifestyle differences between the constituents of democrats and those of the blue dogs. Both blocks could get away with any decent bill. Simply, the blue dogs were targeted because they were the only plausible allies of the insurance companies, and they danced for the money. But the blue dogs will be the first to go in the midterms if reform fails, so they have to play their two mistresses - the DNC and the insurance companies - against one another. They have to make sure the bill (which they will have to vote for) is as inane and unhelpful as possible by the time it comes down to a vote, that way they'll survive the midterms and still get money from their insurance company friends. The financially stressed families and the uninsured will have to pay the price for the subterfuge.

    They're about as philanthropic and likable as wasps.
  • HSR0601
    Part 1.

    Problems :

    1. No systematic, expansive Prevention & Wellness Program.


    2. A pay for each service / volume compensation, & No E-Medical Record.


    3. Premium Inflation.



    4. 'Work or Break' health system with no brake or safety system.
  • Leonidas
    "Most polls show people overwhelmingly favor heath care and insurance reform. The devil is in the details."

    --Detail number 1, the public overwhelmingly wants Republicans to be included in the real formulation of policy, not just a partisan democratic bill that has shut out the opposing point of view in its effort to rush through legislation before the Democratic Honeymoon is over. Poll numbers are down, so they pushed healthcare ahead of climate change. The people don't want a ruch job with political motivations, they want a job done right with lots of bipartisan debate and give and take, not another item ticked off on a democratic wish list that they will likely be stuck with for the rest of their lives. Healthcare needs to be bigger than the political parties.

    If the democrats ever actually make a real effort to engage in a new negoation with republicans, then the ball is no longer in their court for rushing things too fast, but will be in the GOP court to see if they match such an effort or if they obviously try to stall, if they do, then the Dems can pull out that filibuster proof majority and use it without so much public disapproval.
  • archangel
    Please refrain from posting long long comments. Just a reminder, according to TMV posting rules for commenters, no posting articles or cross-posting long comments to more than one post at TMV. If you want to post a long comment or your own article, give a few paras and then link to the full long comment elsewhere or on your own site, and readers can click on it if they are interested.

    Thanks.

    dr.e
    Assistant Editor, The Moderate Voice
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC