An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Senate’s Most Bipartisan Votes of the Year

At the very least, these are the most high-profile, bipartisan votes of the year in the Senate:

1. Justice Sotomayor’s confirmation, for which nine GOP Senators voted yes

2. Expanded funding of “cash for clunkers,” for which seven GOP Senators voted yes

(Accenting the bipartisanship of the latter vote, Missouri’s two Senators split, but not as you might expect: Republican Bond voted “yes,” and Democrat McCaskill voted “no.” You gotta love Missouri; if any state is bipolar, we are. Of course, that’s not always a bad trait. In fact, in this case, I applaud Sens. McCaskill and Bond for apparently voting their consciences rather than the party lines.)

Before entering the nation’s highest office, President Obama might have hoped bipartisanship would mean that a third or more of Republicans would support him a third or more of the time. Then, of course, hope met reality: The stimulus bill vote quickly forced a redefining of bipartisanship to mean a mere three GOP Senators, one of whom is now a Democrat.

Doubling and tripling that mark on these more recent votes, I have to believe some folks in the White House are hungover from last night’s celebration.

  • JasonArvak
    One reason for this might NOT be merely the conventional narrative about evil and intransigent Republicans: As the margin of partisan advantage in the Senate (or any legislative body) goes up, there is less incentive for the leaders of that party to even worry about trying to get votes from the other party since the conceptual "median voter" is embedded deeper and deeper into their own caucus. The leaders simply ignore (or, given the priorities of some members of the Democratic base right now, go out of their way to offend) the minority party's preferences. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi seem to both play that game pretty frequently these days.

    So I don't think that lack of bipartisan votes should be simply assumed to be the exclusive fault of Republicans.
  • Pete Abel
    "I don't think that lack of bipartisan votes should be simply assumed to be the exclusive fault of Republicans."
    I agree.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC