An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

911 Caller in Gates Arrest Never Said ‘Black Suspects’

alg_crowley_1.jpg

The 911 tape has been released. CNN:

In the call, Lucia Whalen reports seeing “two larger men, one looked kind of Hispanic, but I’m not really sure, and the other one entered, and I didn’t see what he looked like at all.”

“I just saw it from a distance, and this older woman was worried, thinking somebody’s breaking in someone’s house and they’ve been barging in,” Whalen says. “She interrupted me, and that’s when I noticed. Otherwise, I probably wouldn’t have noticed it at all, to be honest with you. So I was just calling because she was a concerned neighbor, I guess.” Listen in on the 911 phone call »

Attorney Wendy Murphy, who represents Whalen, also categorically rejected part of the police report that said Whalen talked with Sgt. James Crowley, the arresting officer, at the scene.

“Let me be clear: She never had a conversation with Sgt. Crowley at the scene,” Murphy told CNN by phone. “And she never said to any police officer or to anybody ‘two black men.’ She never used the word ‘black.’ Period.”

I have to say I’m shocked. When I asked last week Would A Webcam At Gates’ Home Have Changed Anything? I never imagined that the witness would dispute Sgt. Crowley’s version of events. I have very serious issues with the reliability of witness testimony, but as I read it now, the words on the tape contradict the police report. That’s bad.

I piped down after my post following Obama’s regret Friday. I thought Obama’s press room appearance was pitch perfect. His skills will be required now more than ever. I’m glad they’ll be drinking Blue Moon this week. The issue is not right and wrong, not making a point, not winning. It is reconciliation, pure and simple easier said than done!

LATER RELATED: Radley Balko argues that we ought to put race aside and focus instead on the overly broad arrest powers afforded to the police:

The conversation we ought to be having in response to the July 16 incident and its heated aftermath isn’t about race, it’s about police arrest powers, and the right to criticize armed agents of the government.

By any account of what happened—Gates’, Crowleys’, or some version in between—Gates should never have been arrested. “Contempt of cop,” as it’s sometimes called, isn’t a crime. Or at least it shouldn’t be. It may be impolite, but mouthing off to police is protected speech, all the more so if your anger and insults are related to a perceived violation of your rights. The “disorderly conduct” charge for which Gates was arrested was intended to prevent riots, not to prevent cops from enduring insults. Crowley is owed an apology for being portrayed as a racist, but he ought to be disciplined for making a wrongful arrest.

On the conservative contradiction:

Commenting on Gates’ arrest, National Review’s Jonah Goldberg wrote that he counts himself among those who are “deferential to police,” and willing to “give cops the benefit of the doubt for a host of reasons.” That’s a common position among conservatives. At a Federalist Society luncheon a few years ago, Bush Solicitor General Ted Olson praised the Supreme Court for “putting more trust in our police officers” in recent rulings. Los Angeles Police Department officer Jack Dunphy (a pseudonym) oddly concluded at National Review Online that the lesson from the Gates/Crowley affair is that anyone who asserts his constitutional rights when confronted by a police officer risks getting shot.

And the NYTimes reports that The Root, the website where Mr. Gates is editor in chief, has been flooded with racial slurs:

A few commenters used grotesque racial epithets, others crudely parodied black speech, and some proudly called themselves racist. One used the screen name of James Earl Ray, the man who killed Martin Luther King Jr.

Those probably should have been removed, said Terence W. Samuel, deputy editor of The Root, but he added that worse comments had been taken down.

“For the most part, as long as the comments are not threats of violence, and the most vicious, nasty, racist comments, we leave them up,” he said.

Keep that in mind, folks, as we debate here. Me, I say again, I’m counting on Obama, Gates & Crowley to have that beer. Then come out reconciled and teach all of us a thing or two.

  • AustinRoth
    I thought it was very interesting that she mentioned two suitcases, and that the 911 operator then seemed to lead her on towards a concern about a break-in.
  • qwert321
    >>>I’m counting on Obama, Gates & Crowley to have that beer. Then come out reconciled and teach all of us a thing or two.<<<<

    Obama and Gates think the arrest was completely improper and indicative of this country's racial past.
    Almost everyone else thinks Crowley acted professionally and correctly.

    What sort of reconciliation can really come of this photo op? Both parties have strongly held beliefs that will not change over a glass of beer.
  • JWindish
    Qwert, I must say I am disappointed by your comment. It doesn't substantively address anything in my post. What it does is state your opinion. And your opinion that "everyone else thinks Crowley acted professionally and correctly" is called into question by the evidence cited in my post: that Crowley's police report is at odds with what's on the tape of the 911 call. And that he used race in his police report at odds with the facts.

    Now I only based my opinion on what was said in the CNN report. I haven't heard the tape. I haven't read more. I'm open to hearing more. I could be wrong in my conclusion. But WHETHER OR NOT the report of the tape turns out to be accurate, what you so accurately quoted is that my solution to the box that ALL OF THEM are in, is for the 3 of them to model civility, to bring us all down a peg, and teach us all a thing or two.
  • Zzzzz
    I don't agree with your assertion that 'almost everyone' thinks Crowley acted properly. Plenty of people, like me, think that Crowley acted improperly and Gates should not have been arrested. I have no idea if race played a role in this. However, that isn't the main issue to me. The main issue is abuse of police power. It isn't illegal to act like a jerk. Hauling him in for that under a bogus 'disorderly conduct' charge, which he obviously didn't meet the legal criteria for (or else they wouldn't have dropped the charges) isn't proper police behavior. Isn't the whole point of the 2nd amendment that we have the right to protect ourselves from the government when it acts against our legal rights? I don't understand why conservatives are on the wrong side of this issue!
  • roro80
    "I don't understand why conservatives are on the wrong side of this issue!"

    Yes, where ARE the libertarians here? Saying that somehow in order not to get arrested in one's own home, one must be deferrential and look at one's shoes when an officer is in the vacinity? That's pretty much the opposite of what makes sense. Or is it only white men who get to challenge the power of the government?
  • DaGoat
    I think both libertarians and non-libertarians would agree you're better off being polite to the police.
  • kritt11
    This non-issue has outlived its 15 minutes.
  • roro80
    DaGoat -- Maybe you'd be "better off", but that still doesn't make it illegal to be rude to the police. It's a pretty blatant abuse of power to arrest someone because he is rude to you. I can't remember where I read it, but I read something earlier this week about how yes, it's come to the place where it's a calculated risk to challenge a police officer's authority, in the same way that it's not illegal but very stupid to yell at a bunch of thugs in the street. The point: should we have to make the same risk calculations when dealing with police as we do with street thugs?

    And kritt -- while I don't necessarily disagree, this story brought together a lot of under-the-radar topics that I think people need to hash out: race, class, elitism, police/government abuse of power, etc. It's more of a tool to figure out where we as a nation stand on these issues than just its own story, I think.
  • Volusia65
    Americans should be ashamed (Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, WHATEVER!) of how far this issue has been completely blown out of proportion, the MEDIA is absolutely absurd when then they give a report on something so foolish and not news worthy, its evident that the entire situation could have been avoided if someone didn't try and use they personal position to justify something when they are REQUIRED to show proof that it is their residence! The officer did what is protocol and I commend him for that, for Gates to act like a spoiled child and cry foul because he didn't get his way speaks volumes about his character and President Obama...Shame on you! Where is your professionalism? And to depict this as racism because 2 "BLACK" males were described in the report......DUH! thats what are they! So lets everyone jump on the MEDIA band wagon and go along to see where this ride is headed......ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CNN, ETC. you are not reporting with crap like this, you are instigating.... wake up people!
  • DaGoat
    roro80 i think it is a reasonable concern that Gates was arrested improperly and there is a good chance Crowley went overboard. I think either man could have prevented the escalation of the situation but neither did. So if you want to argue Crowley abused his power and Gates was just a dumb ass that's certainly a reasonable argument.

    I'm not sure I like the idea that a cop should be expected to stand and take verbal abuse indefinitely either, though.
  • Father_Time
    Gates was NOT arrested improperly. Gates was arrested for civil disruption and should have been prosecuted, but the good and kind police let big mouth off.

    Maybe we should revisit the charges. Should be a caning offence IMO.
  • This whole thing is basically because the report described them as two black males, which was not a false statement. Had they been white, they would have been described in the report as two white males. Had they been Hispanic, they would have been described as two Hispanic males. This is a clear case of somebody being insulted that they were not afforded special treatment due to their station in life, and he is pulling the race card as a retaliation.

    Pitiful that people are even defending the version of events that the police acted improperly. We can hear the police officer talking on the radio while Gates is screaming at him in the background. The man clearly is so wrapped up in his own race issues that he is projecting them on everyone else.
  • casualobserver
    What shoots the entire liberal viewpoint out of the water is that if the officer acted with/out of racial profiling, harassment, brutality, improper procedure, filing a false police report or falsely arresting, where is their filing of charges?

    So, either listen to Barry, pony up the beers and move on.........or file the complaint.
  • DLS
    "This non-issue has outlived its 15 minutes."

    I'm afraid not, in the case of the media (which, after Obama's idiotic remark and behavior, responded with hype rivaling its behavior after Michael Jackson's death), and the others who came out of the shadows with their predictable and lowly Sixties-radical-baggage-attached nonsense about the pervasive profiling and "white dominated, privileged" society and all the rest of the idiocy.

    It was a non-event to normal people, but not to Obama who wrongly exploited it (in a blatantly political manner, and who later expressed "surprise" at the widespread public opposition to this and related behavior) and all the others who wanted to _exploit_ it, which because the _real_ _true_ event.

    grrr

    On the bright side, it has further deflated the hype over Obama, and constitutes a blunder by him at a time of public concern about the Dems' rushing in Washington to pass all kinds of bad legislation and with failures Obama is experiencing in particular along with other Dems with the health care initiative.
  • DLS
    "What shoots the entire liberal viewpoint out of the water"

    ... even without the facts that you list, C.O., is Gates's _age_. Profiling (a real issue) is favoring those prone to crime, namely the young. (_One_ constructive fact related to the "racism" hype by the media and activist dreck once this event wrongly made major news nation-wide is that in the past and now, any tension toward some blacks or other minorities and _whites_ out of concern for safety is directed, again, at _youth_. Does anyone find an older person of any race or ethnicity _frightening_?) [rolling eyes]

    Gates's _age_ immediately ruled out "racial profiling," at least among those not "challenged" someway.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC