An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Why Moderate Republicans Suck

Okay, that the above title might be a bit harsh. But even so, we Moderates really are in a world of hurt.

The moderate/liberal movement in the GOP that once had the likes of Thomas Dewey and Dwight Eisenhower is barely alive these days. Some of that is due to the fact that social conservatives have driven moderates out of the party with their emphasis on issues like abortion and gay rights as litmus tests. As David Jenkins has reported, hard right conservatives have done what they can to get rid of GOP leaders that are deemed not Republican enough.

So, one important reason that there is not a thriving moderate movement in the GOP is because the party has done a good job at trying to purge us from the party.

Many a writer tends to stop at that point and not ask anymore questions. The belief is that the current Republican leadership, which tends to be made up of hard right conservatives, needs to be more open to moderates. Of course, this is true. Even though the current leadership is far more conservative, they need to be willing to bend on certain issues, especially in those swing districts. What works in a Republican dominated area, doesn’t work in all areas. This is what helped bring Democrats back into dominance: they ran more conservative Democrats in areas that were swing districts. It tended to work swimmingly for them.

But this is only part of the story. Bloggers and journalists tend to write what is the easy story: narrow minded Republicans harrassing their more moderate brethren. But there is another part of the story that tends to be missing, though some people do catch it now and then.

The missing story is the lack of a credible countermovement within the GOP, a movement for change. When one talks of Moderate Republicans, we talk of basically a loose group of individuals who are basically on their own. For example, take Senator Arlen Specter, who until recently was a moderate Republican. After he voted for the stimulus package, he recieved a fair amount of protests from Republican groups.

The image in the media was of a lone Republican Senator against a phalanx of hard right groups. In the end, Specter decided to leave.

This image has been seen again and again. A lone, moderate Republican legislator is attacked, not by a collection of cranks, but by organized groups that have the money and more importantly, the people to take down those who are not pure.

The lesson here is simple, the hard right is a movement. There are groups of like-minded individuals that come together and are able to force change in the party. A single person realizes they are part of a larger movement and that gives them the stregnth to march forward.

On the other side, moderates are at best a collection of individuals. We tend to feel lost and alone and don’t feel a connection to anything greater than us. Because we are isolated, we don’t feel as empowered and tend to give up easily.

If the GOP is to moderate, then there needs to be an effective moderate movement within the GOP forcing change. Nothing will ever happen unless these collection of frustrated individuals come together and organize.

Hence, why we moderates suck.

What conservatives in the Republican party have done over time is to create a culture that could sustain them. Think tanks, magazines, organizations and blogs have all been developed to foster this culture. Yes, it has been inward focus and it does have its weaknesses, but what this conservative culture is good at is empowering people, making them believe that it is in their power to change things.

The reason moderates do not feel so empowered is because we have no discernable culture or movement to back us up and give us meaning. The result is that we feel adrift and powerless to make a difference.

There are many ways to help build a credible movement of moderate to liberal Republicans. I want to focus on a few area where there is a weakness.

Blogs. There are many blogs on the far left (ie: Daily Kos, Huffington Post) and on the far right (ie: RedState, Hot Air) that cater to those parts of the political spectrum. Some have many readers, some have a few. But all of them have something in common: they reinforce a person’s political viewpoint. Now, many of these partisan blogs are more heat than light on the political issues of the day. They are more cheerleaders than they are trying to think about issues. In the past, I would have said that being a cheerleader is of little value, and to some extent, I still believe that. However, there is also a case to be made that a little cheerleading for your side can make one feel that they are part of a greater movement; that they are not alone in how they feel of think.

When one goes to look for blogs of moderate/liberal/progressive Republicans, you will tend to find a graveyard of blogs that were started with good intent, but then died for various reasons. Take for example, the Lincoln Coalition, a blog that states it’s goal as “a grassroots organization of current and former Republicans that is dedicated to building a party based on traditional Republican principles.” It has not published a new post in over two months. They had a wonderful description that talked about wanting to return the party back to its principles. They had a few months of post and then…nothing.

It’s hard to try to rebuild a party when you aren’t trying disseminate ideas.

There are other bloggers that have also stopped for various reasons. Go to Charging RINO, or Plain Talk GOP or the Liberal Republican (which has since been removed), and you will find blogs that are basically dead. Now, the internet is full of blogs that are no longer in use, and there are probably a good number of conservative and liberal blogs that are also on life support, but for some reason, the ones that I see that have become ghost towns tend to be moderate Republican blogs.

I’ve been blogging on politics in one form or another for a few years now. I don’t know how many people see my blog, but I do know it is important to keep blogging on the events of the day. And I do know that over time people do see your work and take notice. Blogging can be about yelling, but it can also be about sharing and presenting ideas to people. It can be about getting out a message and letting others know they are not alone in the political world. An active blog can also help grow a living movement. A dead blog can’t do that.

Lack of Strong Institutions. One of the glaring problems among moderates in the GOP is the lack of a counterpart to the Democratic Leadership Council. The DLC describes itself as a organization started to bring Democrats out of the “political wilderness. ” The goal was to moderate the Democratic Party and wrest it from the hands of the liberals who controlled the party and brought it to defeat. If you go to the DLC website, you find papers on various issues from immigration to health care, all placing a centrist Democratic spin on things.

There really isn’t a counterpart among Republicans. Yes, there is the Republican Leadership Council, and it has done some good by supporting moderate candidates. That said, it doesn’t seem to offer ideas in the way that the DLC does. The RLC does have state chapter, but the site doesn’t say a whole lot about what is going on.

That doesn’t mean that groups like RLC or Republican Mainstreet Partnership are somehow wastes of time. I think both groups have good and grand intentions, but they lack the people to help promote and fuel their agendas. If moderates feel disenfranchised and isolated, then trying to buck up worthy groups like these seem pointless.

Weak Web Presence. If you check out the website of Republican Youth Majority, you will notice that it hasn’t been updated in a long while. Go to their Facebook Page and you will find the same thing. If IanTanner is correct and the GOP needs to reach out to younger populations that are more moderate on social issues, this group should have a live page showing what they are doing. But instead we find a very old website and Facebook page. I have no idea what they are doing.

Take a look at the California Republican League, a state moderate organization. Again, the website has not been update since at least 2004. It does look like the group is still in existence because of it’s Facebook page, but other than that, I have no idea what they are doing and how they plan to help moderate the California GOP.

If an organization doesn’t bother to update its website, then it might as well not exist. The only way for a group to thrive is to have an active web presence getting its message out. Some groups like Log Cabin Republicans and Republicans for Environmental Protection get it, use blogs, and social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook and update their webpage.

Individualism. Maybe the thing that is most destructive to creating a moderate movement is that most moderates tend to see themselves as individuals and not part of a movement. Moderates are not one to just follow someone and while that can be commendable, it can also breed a sense of isolation, so that when the cold winds of extremism blow, they are easily knocked down and they leave the party.

There is an old saying from the civil rights movement that goes, “Walk Together Children, Don’t You Get Weary.” Maybe if we learned to walk together, to support each other in the hard times then we would see a stronger movement. Trying to change a party takes stamina and fortitude, but it also takes numbers and as they say, there is strength in numbers.

These are only a few observations. If people want the GOP to be a center-right party again, then it is up to moderates to make it happen. But we have to be able to do it as a team and make the long slog to change. We have to be willing to blog, create strong organizations, and use the web to get out the message of change within the GOP.

Then, Moderate Republicans won’t suck.

Crossposted at the Progressive Republican

  • pacatrue
    Terrific post, Dennis. I said that on a similar one of yours a few weeks ago. I see myself in various ways in this post. From the simple fact that I discovered TMV from Jeremy's Charging RINO site, to the fact that, even though I vote Democrat a lot of the time, I generally dislike half the emails I get from them that are political in nature, to the fact that I am searching for a different non-federal approach to solving problems but haven't found one yet (I mostly see a federal approach from Dems and no solutions from Republicans).
  • Father_Time
    IMO social issues are poverty, unemployment, healthcare, education, and, tolerance for racial minorities. Not gay rights. Gay rights is an extreme minority issue that is crushing poverty right out of the public conscience. The Democrat party is being held back from acquiring far more power because they continue to patronize gay activists, when the vast majority of the party would really like to drop the issue off a bridge.

    Also Democrats are perceived as weak on defense. The Democrat party needs, IMO, to better foster the impression that we are wiser on defense than the republicans, rather than weaker. Which should, by all intent and purpose, be an easy task.

    Currently we are being held back by Blue Dog Democrats on the healthcare issue. Self defeating the Democrat party. This is stupid. Our “conservative wing” should be sticking closer to the party by bashing gay rights and remaining quieter on core issues. Both will get them re-elected.

    I can imagine the outcome of the French revolution had French revolutionary patriots marching from Marseilles to Paris had been quibbling the fine points of why they joined the revolution, instead of singing together in unison. Or otherwise discuss lawn care instead of fomenting Esprite-de-corps.

    So it would seem that there are problematic moderates within both the Republican and Democrat parties

    lol
  • shannonlee
    The problem with moderates is that they are not willing to sell their home to support their candidates. Extremists are more than willing to give up their childs college fund to support prop 8...which happened btw. A moderate would never do something that stupid.

    Wealthy moderates or moderates from swing areas can survive locally, but across the board, they can't wield enough power nationally to compete against the wackos.
  • brookguy1
    Thank you for your honesty. I am gay and have been telling my friends that we are pretty much universally reviled by both parties, not just the GOP. Gay people have been flushing their money away by supporting these politicians who like the donations but really just want the gay community to evaporate.

    I really believe heterosexual folks fall into two categories, those who hate us to our faces, and those who hate us behind our backs, out of some kind of liberal guilt. I personally prefer the open disdain, like from you, because at least I know what I'm dealing with.
  • brookguy1
    I meant the above comment as a reply to father time, but it didn't show up that way...
  • redbus
    Dennis,

    Whether true or not, conservatives have done a good job of getting people to believe that "moderate" is really just another word for liberal. So, are they right? In your opinion, in what way exactly would a moderate differ from a liberal?

    Take, for example, two issues:

    1. Health care - A liberal believes _________. A moderate believes __________.

    2. Abortion -- A liberal believes ____________. A moderate believes _________.

    Let's see if we can tease out some real differences.
  • Dr J
    Dennis, I think what moderates lack is not institutions or ideas as much as ripping yarns. Dramatic tales of good versus evil, right versus wrong, us versus them, whose villains are fun to boo and heroes to cheer and rally around. The right has its morality plays of the god-fearing versus the sinning hordes. The left is glued to the screen to watch corporate Greedzilla demolish everything in its path, while useless government tanks and helicopters fight bravely but vainly to protect the public good. They're none of them true, but they build on collective articles of faith, and they get the blood moving.

    What are moderates offering? Foreign-language films full of nuance and complexity and shades of gray. Dry documentaries about economics and history and sociology, where there are no heroes and problems are worked out only patiently over decades. Booorrr-rring! How are you hoping to put butts in seats that way?
  • roro80
    Dr. J -- I haven't been one to agree with you often, but I am in total agreement with your comment here. People like the good vs evil, cut-n-dry, easy-answers (I'm right and you're wrong!). Nuance and moral ambiguity aren't things that make most people comfy-cozy.
  • tidbits
    redbus - I take your challenge.

    Healthcare: A LIBERAL believes in universal, single payor, government controlled healthcare, including government control of the medical services industry. A MODERATE believes in providing healthcare to the maximum population possible in public/private partnership, perhaps through a pooled insurance fund, funded in a rational manner (not exclusively on the backs of one class of citizens), with a cooperative effort to increase efficiency (rather than increase government control ) of the healthcare delivery system.

    Abortion: A LIBERAL believes in abortion on demand, without exception. A MODERATE believes that the right to privacy and individual choice should be maintained, i.e. that abortion should remain legal, but that there are justifications for reasonable restrictions like health and safety certification of abortion clinics, parental consent for surgical procedures for minors, and restrictions on late term abortions.
  • roro80
    tidbits -- so all current democrats are moderate? I mean, if that's the point you're trying to make, I don't necessarily disagree, but you pretty much described what the Democrats are trying to do in both of your "moderate" descriptions. There are a few Dems on each side of your descriptions, but on average, you're pretty dead-on.
  • shannonlee
    brook, I've been saying it on this site for months now. The Dem party has tossed the gay rights movement under the bus. It isn't that they hate you. It's that they don't value you. You simply aren't worth the political collateral.

    Sad....very sad.
  • tidbits
    roro80 - I respectfully disagree with your assessment that current democrats are moderates. Most current democrats are quite liberal by the above definition, but are forced to water down to accommodate Blue Dogs for the necessary votes.

    The current health plan is not moderate...it is loaded with top down government control of the healthcare delivery system, includes a public option (very different from a pooled fund of private insurers) and seeks to fund the system on the backs of one class, the wealthy. That it turned out not to be a single payor system is a factor of vote getting, not ideological preference of the most of democrats.

    Any moderation on abortion is largely the result of court action and republican efforts at the state level to water down Roe v Wade.

    Certainly, some democrats are moderate, just as some republicans are moderate, but moderates are in the minority of both parties, and control neither. Moderates in both parties do wield power beyond their numbers because of the voting requirements in Congress, but please do not mistake that for leadership positions, key committee chairs or principal responsibility for legislation. I give democrats this much credit: in order to gain control of the House and Senate, they actively recruited moderates to run in swing districts and did so with great success.

    The hijacking of the major parties by the extremes of each and the uncomfortable position of moderates in both parties is a fascinating topic for another time. I have long advocated, and will again here, the uniting of moderate republicans, moderate democrats and moderate independents into a viable third party, but, alas, that too is a subject for another time.
  • roro80
    tidbits, while I definitely appreciate the well-thought-out response, I still disagree with your assessment.

    On the health care issue, if most democrats truly wanted single payer, quite frankly I think that would be somewhere on the table. (I personally would welcome such a thing, but I have no problem being thought of as somewhat extreme on this particular topic.) It hasn't even been brought up as a possibility. The public option is quite far from single payer. With a 60-seat majority, wouldn't it be at least a topic of discussion if that's where the hearts and minds of the dems were?

    On abortion -- I'm about as lefty as they come on this issue, as in full-on feminist, and the only one of the "moderate" viewpoints I don't hold is the parental consent part of your description. I run with a lot of pro-choice activists, and I don't know *anyone* whose views could be summed up as "believes in abortion on demand, without exception". That description would go far beyond what is in Roe, and most pro-choice people (including the most adament) just want to be able to keep the protections written into that decision.
  • joeinhell
    I'm stunned, there are moderate republicans? Hell, the Democratic party has moved so far to the right, that the liberals of the 1960s would have classified almost all of the current Democratic party as ossified antique republicans.

    We hardly have moderate Democrats and you think that there is a chance of moderate republicans, you are just flat delusional. This is an oligarchy, run by and for the rich. Possibly not more than 10 per cent of all elected officials don't sell out for cash money or favors.

    Look at Murtha of PA, dig into his past and you see real corruption that dwarfs Ted Stevens of Alaska by 50 times.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC