An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Pat and Sonia

As a black man let me say that there is not much that I and Patrick J Buchanan agree on. Although I admire his forthright unvarnished demeanor, I think that his world view is based on the baseless premises that white male Americans are gods real chosen people.

With that said I do consider Uncle Pat to be an evil genius. I think his oratorical skills are up there with Obama and Kennedy (yes I said it). He makes vile bigoted statements sound common sense. You only have to look at his populist campaigns of the 1990’s and the sheer emotions he evoked in his supporters and detractors to recognize that politically, Patrick J Buchanan is no joke and that’s why I feel democrats have to take what he says seriously.

So when Buchanan says play the race card with Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor to reconnect with lost Republicans I assume that this strategy is a politically potent one. Truth be told, the White House have not done very well in framing the conversation on Sotomayor’s nomination because it was transparent in its execution. They needed a woman because of the already testosterone dominated make up of the court and they needed to sure up a growing and influential base in the Latino community.

The Democratic White House played politics with one of their most important duties to the country.

Now back to Pat. Watching his appearance on The Rachel Maddow Show, although you can see the hatred he has for Sotomajor seeping out of his ears like smoke coming out of an angry cartoon bull you had to say that he made some valid points. Shouldn’t picking a Supreme Court Judge be devoid of politics of any kind and just be about who is the best for the job?

The point I am trying to make is that I don’t believe that Sonia Sotomajor would have been picked for the Court if she was a white/black/Asian/Middle-Eastern Man – she got picked because she fit the right political criteria to suit President Obama and the democrats.

Now don’t get me wrong, I think that affirmative action is and has been a valuable initiative to make sure that racial prejudice never dominates hiring patterns in the work place. Whether Sotomajor is an ‘affirmative action baby’ is irrelevant to me, the fact is that she excelled in her educational life, I life she might have not been able to have because of the colour of her skin or because of her financial situation.

But her brilliance in the class-room has not been fully realised on the bench. I haven’t read a single opinion or a review of her decisions that has made me think that she is an outstanding judge. Again don’t get me wrong, she seems very competent, but is competent enough for the highest judiciary seat in the United States of America?

This is why I think that Uncle Pat’s racially motivated political attack will ring true to the all important middle of American politics. Although this woman’s grades in the class room are exemplary, she just doesn’t have enough about her to be a United States Supreme Court judge.

I am sure Obama could have found a Latino who is better qualified or a woman who is better qualified, but this whole nomination stinks of politicking and America deserves better than that.

  • jwest
    Thank you for the first intellectually honest article I’ve seen on the Sotomayor appointment.

    Although we disagree politically and on whether or not Pat Buchanan is racist, we agree that Obama made a mistake by overtly picking a Hispanic woman instead of the best liberal mind he could find.

    What will the future hold if Sotomayor’s opinions, even if they are in the majority, are not intellectually on par with Scalia or Roberts? It was more important to find someone who can effectively argue the constitutional merits of a point of law from the left than to fill an ethnic quota.

    On this, we can agree.
  • ernest123
    Sometimes the ignorance of seemingly intelligent people astounds me. For centuries justices have been picked with one overriding criteria, that they be white males. Out of a population of half a billion people, there are bound to be more than one qualified person for a supreme court appointment. So what criteria is used? A chance to diversify the nation's highest court in a diverse nation is beyond long in coming. Additionally, this woman has the most judicial experience of any nominee. Minorities have been defined by their ethnicity since this country's beginning, and will continue be so defined for a very long time. It's not a faucet that can be turned off because white men are now nervous. This is the country that 'they' made.
  • PJBFan
    This reminds me of why the picks of Justices Thurgood Marshall, Clarence Thomas, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg were actually quite brilliant, because each of them has been a bright and powerful voice for their views. This pick reminds me more of the pick of Sandra Day O'Connor, or Harold Carswell. We have a competent, but not stellar, jurist who is expected to be a solid vote for a specific side of the political spectrum, with a pick that as obviously political and far too obvious.

    As to what you said, Ernest, I disagree. White privilege once existed, but no longer does it any more, and rightfully, it should not. However, the pendulum has swung to the other end of the spectrum, and white men are disfavoured. I frankly don't care if the Supreme Court, or Congress, or the Presidency or anything looks like the country. I would rather have the best and the brightest, and say "who cares" when it comes to race, ethnicity, sex, gender, national origin, sexual orientation or any other characteristic. It does not matter what one looks like, it matters what the brain contains. Hence the pick of Justice Alito over more PC potential choices, such as Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers-Brown, or even Sonia Sotomayor, who was rumoured to be on the list to replace Justice O'Connor, was a wise one.
  • Father_Time
    Pat Buchanan is not intelligent. He is a talking head gone political and failed. He says what he says because he knows that a clown with notoriety will always make money on the boob tube political shows. I suspect that it is worse than you expect. As long as you are focused on the benign and nearly likable antics of Pat Buchanan, you may feel comfortable and overlook the real hatred that sits below the surface within the republican party.

    Pat Buchanan is the redneck version of an uncle tom.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC