I haven’t written on the Mark Sanford saga in a while — mainly because there hasn’t been much new/newsworthy to report (he’s still in office and he’s apparently trying to reconcile with his wife), but also because, I admit, I grew tired of it — but The State has some new details on Sanford’s trip to Argentina to see his mistress (or, to be more precise, on the story he spun to cover up that trip) that make his irresponsible actions all the more disturbing:
Gov. Mark Sanford’s chief of staff, Scott English, called the governor’s cell phones 15 times during the governor’s secret trip to Argentina to visit his lover last month. But the governor never picked up.
Meanwhile Sanford’s communications director, Joel Sawyer, worked to minimize the fact the governor had been out of touch with his staff for about four days.
Records released Monday show Sawyer juggled e-mails and media calls from around the nation, giving a consistent message that was later proven to be untrue.
Those records also show Sanford declined a dinner invitation from a company looking to expand its business in South Carolina because Sanford planned to be in Argentina that day.
Sanford has since said he intentionally misled Sawyer and other staff members to believe he was hiking the Appalachian Trail when he was really with his Argentine lover.
Let me be clear about this, once again: What Sanford did in private is his business — and his family’s. It shows poor judgement, to be sure, but I don’t think we ought to judge the private lives of politicians (unless they truly cross the line into illegal or unethical behaviour).
But… he’s a state governor, the holder of the highest office in South Carolina. It is simply unacceptable that he just up and disappeared, that he deceived, lied to, his own staff, to his closest advisors. It is unacceptable that they couldn’t reach him. Privacy — yes. But not at the expense of one’s duty to the public. If he values his own private life so much, and if it gets in the way of his duty to the public (which it apparently did), he should resign.
But… no. He’s still there, refusing to step down, his ego still getting the better of him (and of South Carolinians), and he’ll no doubt follow in a long line of moral transgressors and hypocrites by re-emerging a changed man, all for the better, no harm done.
But harm was done — to his wife, to his family, to his staff, to all those who care about him both personally and politically, as well as to his state and its citizens. He put himself first, not just before all else but at the expense of all else, and, in going AWOL, he crossed the line. There’s no way he should still be in office.
(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)
Are people outside of SC still thinking about this?? This issue now belongs to SC…the voters of that state will decide on whether or not he should be in office. If we can let go of Palin for a day, we can let go of Sanford too.
shannonlee, as a resident of this state, and speaking from my own experience, this issue is over. The Repubs in the state house voted to censor Sanford and declared that that was the end of it. Sure, you hear lots of folks talking about it over coffee, but there isn't a whole lot the voters can do now except wait for his 18 months to finish.
Since Michael has declared the new Health Care Bill mostly positive and beyond much debate, I guess he has nothing more to talk about. Perhaps he is brushing up on his skills to be a blogger for TMZ or some other gossip site.
“If we can let go of Palin for a day, we can let go of Sanford too.”
Now you did it. Expect more rabid, hate-filled anti-Palin thrashing from Mikey sometime soon (which may last, over multiple threads, until he hates another USA Dim-wits' demon).