An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Poll: Americans Don’t Want To Intervene In Iran And Approve Of Obama Comments

A new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll provides yet another example of how the talk radio political culture is outside the country’s emerging political center: it basically finds strong support for the Obama administration’s non-intervention stand in the Iranian election as well as President Barack Obama’s comments that have been soundly blasted by conservatives and on radio and cable talk radio:

A new national poll suggests that that nearly three out of four Americans don’t want the U.S. directly intervene in the election crisis in Iran even though most Americans are upset by how the Iranian government has dealt with protests over controversial election results.

More than eight in ten questioned in the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, released Monday, think the election results released by the Iranian government were a fraud, with just one in ten believing the results were accurate. But only three in ten respondents say they are personally outraged by the results, with another 55 percent upset by not outraged.

Most Americans approve of how President Obama’s handled the situation. And 74 percent think the U.S. government should not directly intervene in the post-election crisis, with one out of four feeling that Washington should openly support the demonstrators who are protesting the election results.

This underscores a fact of the modern media, if you including within that definition the old mainstream media (newspapers, traditional broadcast, news magazines) and new media (cable and talk radio, blogs, etc.): anger and outrage are at a premium and it gets readerships and viewership.

But so far a steady stream of polls suggests that Obama is either reflecting or influencing the country’s political middle. His winning election coalition continues to support him. It’s basically comprised of Democrats, independent voters (who are not monolithic but more support him then don’t even thought his support from this group has suffered some erosion), and some Republicans turned off by some things about their own party. Those Republicans are often more moderate Republicans.

The group most marginalized in this? Conservative Republicans allied with the talk radio political culture. The CNN poll shows this trend again:

“Some 56 percent say that Obama’s criticism of the Iranian regime has been about right. Only a third say that he has not gone far enough in his comments about the situation in Iran,” said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “If the number who are outraged by what’s going on Iran were higher, we would probably see a higher number of Americans who say that Obama has not been tough enough on the leaders of that country.”

“Interestingly, older Americans are more likely to be outraged. They may have bitter memories of the American hostages held by Iran for more than a year in 1979 and 1980,” said CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider.

This trend (and coalition) may not persist throughout Obama’s term, but it is relatively steady — as is Obama’s high approval rating:

A new national poll indicates that President Barack Obama’s approval rating among Americans remains steady.

Sixty-one percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday say they approve of how Obama’s handling his duties as president. Thirty-seven percent disapprove.

The 61 percent approval rating is down one point from May and down six points from February.

“Since March, Obama’s approval rating has gone down one percentage point each month in CNN polls,” notes CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “In March it was 64 percent; in April it was 63 percent. Last month his approval rating stood at 62 percent and now it is at 61 percent.”

The poll suggests when it comes to opinions of Obama, gender and generation gaps continue.

Sixty-seven percent of women questioned in the survey approve of how Obama’s handling his job as president. That number drops to 54 percent among men. Two-thirds of people under 50 years old questioned in the poll approve of the president’s handling of his duties. That number drops to 54 percent among people over 50 years of age.

  • shannonlee
    First of all, I doubt 75% of Americans could point to Iran on a map or pronounce its name correctly. Second, most Americans aren't exactly in tune to the daily comments made by politicians on Iran. I am guessing they believe Obama's last statement was his first statement. I doubt many of them, us, know that Obama's first statement showed more indifference than anything...by saying the two leaders are basically the same so it doesn't really matter who wins...yes that was a brutal paraphrase.

    So who are the major conservative politicians saying that we should intervene in Iran? Last I checked, most of them are happy about Obama's last statement and were wondering what took him so long.

    Is today, "Attack conservative radio day" on TMV? I don't listen to the junk, btw.
  • PWT
    The poll results are the poll results. However, the question is loaded. There is a big difference between 'intervening' and pulling up your big-girl pants speaking out. Speaking out, is what was called for, that it took Mr. Obama more than a week to get to that point, suggest that he is still wrestling with his little-girl pull-ups.

    But, you can take the poll results however you wish if it will help you sleep at night.
  • PWT,
    Speaking out was and is the wrong thing for our President to do. You should speak out all you want, and invite your fellow citizens to join you. However, our President should not pick sides in an internal debate between establishment candidates. Criticizing violence is as far as Obama should have gone.
  • PWT
    Why would it have been wrong for Mr. Obama to speak out? What would be the consequences for the US?

    Why shouldn't he pick sides? In your view, is he incapable of making that type of moral judgment?

    Why does it matter who the debate is between? He was certainly able to choose sides in Honduras.

    Have the republicans urged him to do more than criticize? If so, which ones?
  • DLS
    "Is today, 'Attack conservative radio day' on TMV?"

    "I doubt 75% of Americans could point to Iran on a map or pronounce its name correctly."

    The second item kind of explains why the first could and even would happen.
  • DLS
    "There is a big difference between 'intervening' and pulling up your big-girl pants speaking out."

    Actually, Obama has spoken out (or up), simply refrained from doing anything that would be like Bush the Elder, encouraging the people to revolt, only to see them brutally suppressed without our willingness to attack the government (with our military, that is). (That is true even if Iran already is brutally suppressing what is much less than a revolt currently.)

    In addition to avoiding the elder Bush's error, as I wrote elsewhere some time ago, Obama likely also must face the same situation as Nixon, having to deal with a government with blood on its hands (not limited to those governments who merit our support by taking our side in the Cold War and working with us to counter Soviet foreign aggression, as happened in earlier times all over the world). Plus there is the Chinese example as one more thing to consider.
  • DLS
    "Criticizing violence is as far as Obama should have gone."

    Actually, he or his proxies (such as Clinton) have criticized the electoral misconduct as well, and of course Obama and Company have actually gone what some might say is going too far (which means the equivalent of the "speaking up" some demand): they intervened to keep Twitter operating when it was to be shut down (which constitues supporting the demonstrators, not merely allowing them to communicate outside Iran) and they apparently increased if not began new broadcasting in Farsi on (US) government radio.
  • Silas8
    Shannonlee,

    A majority of Americans may not know much about Iran, but they do know that eight years of bullying the world has gotten us exactly nowhere. They're open to a new approach, one that includes thinking first and not just shouting your mouth off a la McCain, Graham and the neocons.

    I listened to these guys and while your view is reasonable (happy with Obama's final statement) it was clear to the average viewer (as per this poll) that they wanted the tension turned up day one, even as Iranians risked their lives and stated over and over that Obama's handling of the situation was just fine with them.
  • shannonlee
    DLS...that was pretty good :)

    Silas8, we've been bullying Iran for decades....it isn't a neocon thing, it is an American thing. It took Obama quite some time to final say what was needed to the Iranian government. I personally believe it had nothing to do with carefully thinking through the obvious reaction, it had more to do with not knowing what to do in the first place.

    This is what happens when you pick a VP who thought splitting Iraq into 3 different countries was the best way to fix their civil war.

    I believe that most often than not, Obama will come up with the correct response. I just think it will take too long because of his lack of experience. Hopefully we never run into any time critical problems.
  • hass
    There is still no real evidence of election fraud in Iran. Every claim has been compiled and analyzed in detail at IranAffairs.com, and none stands up to scrutiny.

    THINK: Was Mousavi, a former prime minister and very much regime insider, such a threat to the regime that they would have to resort to massive election fraud to keep him out of office? No.
  • Logicon
    People are sick of war, especially wars where America is always the loser. We can't demand anything of Iran because we can't back it up, so what is the point of making any demands or getting in their business. Obama said the reason he didn't say anything about Iran's actions is because he didn't want to meddle in other country's business, but it didn't stop him from meddling in Israel's business, telling them where they can and cannot build homes. What gall.

    Obama is a traitor to America in everything he does. Cozying up to terrorist countries and terrorist organizations, cutting off European countries, taxing us to our death, hating anyone who believes in the Bible and the Constitution, calling tax protestors, vets, Christians and illegal immigrant protestors terrorists. Saying this is a Muslim country, not a Christian country.

    He has put his personal people in every important position there is in government and tells them what to do. What will it take for people to wake up and see this man for the vile traitor he is. He isn't the only traitor in our government, but he is the highest traitor. NAFTA, CAFTA and NAT are traitorous acts to this country, but we are going down without a whimper. So sad.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC