An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Mark Sanford, You’re No King David

I haven’t written anything on the Mark Sanford saga since Thursday morning, when I commented on his humanity and hypocrisy — what he did was all-too-human, however bizarre the contortions of his trip to Argentina and the lies of those close to him, but also, given his conservative Republican moralism, deeply hypocritical as well.

Since then, more has come out. For example:

– His wife, Jenny, now says she’s known about the affair since January.

– Fox News, hardly a media outlet to pass up sensationalism, whatever its partisan leanings, reported that the mistress, a 43-year old resident of Buenos Aires, is professional, passionate, and beautiful — and a brunette.

Politico reported that Sanford had initially booked a 10-day trip.

– TMZ.com found the bar Sanford and his mistress went to, the owner of which noted that the two were “all over each other,” “kissing, holding hands and drinking wine.”

– The woman’s name, apparently, is Maria Belen Chapur. And, apparently, she’s hot.

– And then there was Dear Leader Rush, once again proving himself to be a top blowhard among blowhards, and spewing his usual partisan venom, blamed Obama for Sanford’s demise.

In that last post of mine, I said I felt sorry for Sanford — and certainly more so for his family, especially his wife. Do I still? Yes, I suppose I do. I may not agree with him on, well, anything, but I am not without compassion. I recognize that what he has done is not just all-too-human but all-too-common, and maybe he truly is remorseful. I hope so.

But it’s hard to feel sorry for him when he’s comparing himself to King David.

Yes, that’s right. King David:

I have been doing a lot of soul searching on that front. What I find interesting is the story of David, and the way in which he fell mightily, he fell in very very significant ways. But then picked up the pieces and built from there.

May I say it again?

Mark Sanford… you’re no King David. (Not that I knew King David, but I think I’m right.)

Now, I realize that the Bible is full of fictional(ized) stories meant to be edifying. And I realize, though I am neither Jew nor Christian (nor anything else of the kind), that those stories are not without value to all of us. They can say a lot to us, if we keep our minds open, and we can learn from them, Jew or Christian or not.

But come on… King David? Really? Is that the best comparison to be making at this point?

Sanford is saying many of the right things, and following the standard script — confession, apology, determination to heal, dismissal of the story, hope that it fades from the media’s attention — but this wasn’t one of them.

Now, should he resign? Well, that’s not for me to say… ultimately, Sanford is answerable to the people of South Carolina, not to the rest of us onlookers and commentators. And South Carolinians are divided. A poll that was conducted shortly after his Wednesday press conference has it 50-42 in favour of resignation.

But Mark Sanford, to Mark Sanford, is King David, and he’s not about to resign. (One of his advisors has said that resignation is not an option. Of course, that’s what they always say.)

We shall see.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)

  • JeanCarrier
    I don't see any issue here aside from the fact that Mark Sanford is
    typical lying politician.
    Can't Mark Sanford love two women? Why is his wife so bothered?
    She hasn't been harmed in any way.
  • Wasn't King David gay? What if Maria is Mario?
  • MryTau
    Sanford uses his religion to judge others moral character harshly, to the extent of calling for impeachment of Clinton and resignation of others for adultery, while he is able to redeem himself thru forgiveness for the same transgression using the same religion.

    What a scam! Now he is “holier than thou” once again, thru his request for forgiveness and then compares himself to King David in the bible.

    What kind of religion makes 1 man self righteous (redeemable) and another reprehensible (Stanfords reference of Clinton on his adultery) for the same transgression? Is this some kind of selective religeous forgiveness? Like only GOPers need apply? An impeachable offense for Clinton, according to Stanford, but for Stanford, like the biblical King David, a forgivable transgression that requires the continuation of his power.
  • glitterz
    Governor Sanford is human and we are not in a position to judge. If God forgives, and the First Lady forgives, what gives us the right not to?
  • Jamie_King
    The problem with the King David reference is that so few people, including the Moderate Voice, seem to understand it. I agree that Sanford is no King David, but his situation is sort of like a bargain basement version of the story of David and Bathsheba. David spied Bathsheba while she was bathing and committed adultery with her, who was also married. Bathsheba became pregnant and David first tried to trick her husband, who had been away at war, into thinking that he was the father and when that didn't work David had him killed. He married Bathsheba and incurred the wrath of God, which included the death of his infant son, a sordid tale of incest, rape and insanity among his children, a war with his own son and the eventual death of that son at the hands of his own army. It's really kind of a great story and there's no reason to believe it's fiction. Sanford is also an adulterer and his incurring, if not the wrath of God, the humiliation of being exposed as a fool.
    The only similarity between
  • 2t1redof2faces
    To think that this affair can't hurt,his wife! Is about the most selfish thing I've heard.If the Governor Sanford chooses to go without a condom.Then his wife has the extra worry about contracting an STD.Besides being lied to,and not asked in her wedding vows."Do you take this man,along with any other woman he decides to share his bed with?" Mrs.Mark Sanford probably wouldn't have gotten married.He left to have his drinks and sex in another country.Suppose,one of "HIS" children,had an accident."HIS WIFE",would have to waste precious time,looking for their father,and her husband who suppose be there to comfort her and help make serious decisions.No,it couldn't have her her,that she has to let them know on "Fathers' Day,a piece of "butt" was more important than them." No ,that couldn't hurt!
  • 2t1redof2faces
    I can't believe this woman,has the nerve,to say "she is now hurt or upset".That her privacy was violated.What will she tell her sons,on how to treat there women.Be successful,while using others money,to go an off an betray their trust and their own children.This Maria,must not have "hurt" during her own divorce! I know Govenor Sanford doesn't want to step down.Since he was found out,he has to have a job to pay back thousands of S.Carolina taxpayer money he took for his affair.And to pay for his alimony to his wife,and child support for his children.Lucky,for him.He lost his case for "stimulas money",that stressed him into going to get "butt".Cause he will probably be one of them signing up to get goverment assistance,after he's done paying back-all he took!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC