An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Sadness of Michael Jackson

Well, what more is there to say? One of the genuine icons of our time, which says a lot about our time (more for bad than for good, I would argue), has died at the age of 50.

Like him or not, there is no denying Michael Jackson’s significance in global popular culture. He was a star above stars, as outsized a celebrity as we have ever seen. He was an artist, I’ll give him that, but he was so much more, and over the past twenty years or so his art, his music, receded further and further into the background, eclipsed by a life descending into sordid decay and the media frenzy that covered his salacious demise.

In this sense, he was one of the truly towering figures of our time — and, speaking personally, one of the towering figures of my life. I was almost ten when Thriller came out — and it was an event. I remember it well. It was right as I was growing up and into popular culture, as I was first listening to popular music in a serious way. The album was that touchstone that everyone needed to own, and I had my copy, and I listened to it, and loved it. “Beat It,” “Billie Jean,” “The Girl is Mine,” “Wanna Be Startin’ Somethin’” — these were the soundtrack of my life for a time.

The love soon faded. In my Grade 6 class, a year later, everyone seemed to adore him but me. I had moved on, notably to The Police. For some reason, in my mind, you were either a fan of one or the other, and I preferred a far greater album, Synchronicity, to Thriller — even now, Synchronicity holds up as some of the best music of the ’80s, as music that transcends that musically appalling decade and continues to be relevant, whereas Thriller remains very much of that time, a remnant of a time that evokes embarrassing nostalgia, the ’80s version of what the Bee Gees and Saturday Night Fever meant to the ’70s.

Of course, Michael Jackson was far superior to the Bee Gees, and much of what he did was quite good — even if I now find almost all of it to be awful. Thriller was solid, Bad had its moments (like “Man in the Mirror,” “Dirty Diana,” and “Smooth Criminal”), and there were what I thought were good songs elsewhere (like “Say Say Say,” a duet with Paul McCartney that was once, I am almost ashamed to admit, one of my favourites.

Bad came out in 1987. By the time the terrible Dangerous came out — and it was already his eighth solo album — it was 1991, and he was already something of a joke, if not yet quite the freakshow that he would become. The rest, of course, is history, and it didn’t go well. The music was nothing memorable, and it was Jackson’s personal life, and alleged criminality, that took over. He was still an icon, bigger than ever, the mystery only heightening the appeal (to many, if certainly not to me), but he was an icon to be gawked at, sensationalist tabloid fodder, not to be admired.

I don’t know what he did or didn’t do, but what is clear, I think, is that he was, through it all, a child, a developmentally stunted human being. There was something he had lost as a child — his innocence, perhaps, or even the entirety of a normal childhood — and he was looking for it. It is easy to conclude that what he may have done was despicable — and, again, who knows? — and that he was a pathetic monster hiding behind a plastic mask and a life of abject weirdness, but, in the end, I think it just comes down to this: The life of Michael Jackson was a life of sadness, a life that evokes sadness (in me, at least, looking back, thinking about his decline and fall, and about the culture that enabled the arc of his star, from childhood stardom to global megastardom to final implosion).

And now it’s over.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)

  • How many hits does a pedophile have to chart before people forget what a menace he is/was to kids?
  • loveMJ
    To Michael,

    I find your comments offensive and awfully biased. To compare the musical genius of Michael to the Police is beyond crazy. Who sold more albums? Who influenced the entire world, not just a small part of middle America? Who reached across isles? I think hands down that Thriller will go down as the best SELLING and ARTISTICALLY amazing album of all time. So please with the Police.

    And I would prefer some respect for Michael and his family. He was not a freak but eccentric. I would prefer if you leave your biases at home. I don't like to see them in writers in The Moderate.

    By the way, we are used to haters like you. While no one will ever know your name, MILLIONS upon MILLIONS will admire, love and respect Michael Jackson.
  • post
    Michael Jackson sings bee gees stayin' alive

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoP-bS6txyM
  • LeoinNM
    Gawd you are snob when it comes to music!

    Thriller is one of the best pop albums. How can you even compare that to a rock album? I own both Thriller and Syncronicity. I also own several albums from ABBA and oh that terrible group the Bee Gees. I enjoy anything that is well-crafted. I may not get certain styles of music like rap, but I don't look down my nose at it like it was some kind of cockroach that crawled out into the light.

    Jackson broke the color barrier on MTV in the 80s and perfected the music video genre. I can't think of any videos made to today that hold up to Billy Jean or Thriller. Quite an artistic achievement after 20+ years.

    He also was man who suffered from mental illness brought on by an abusive childhood. The group of people that should have protected him used him. More money and fame than any celebrity has ever seen provided him the means to create a bubble and feed into a cycle of unhealthy behavior. His admitted acts with children are disturbing, possibly criminal. His early childhood treatment should not be used as an excuse for those acts. Now with his death, more bizarre stories about his life-style will come out. You should enjoy this period because Liza Minelli was right when she said this morning, "All hell is going to break loose after the autopsy"

    Personally, my interest in his music declined after the Bad album. His videos and music became more self-indulgent. His syncopated rhythm style of singing he switched to didn't do anything for me and the overdubbed chorus sounded great in 1979 on Off the Wall was very dated in the 1990s. The last thing he did that I really liked was the duet with Janet on Scream in 1995.

    When the child molestation charges surfaced I watched the documentary that instigated the charges. It's ... it is just ... ugh hard to watch if your a fan. The assumption that Jackson got weird after Thriller is false. The documentary shows pre-MEGA-Thriller days where Michael is talking to animals and cartoon characters who are not there and the reaction of his father and mother is even more bizarre. They just ignored it. The film also interviewed people who knew him back in the Jackson 5 days. He had inappropriate friendships with little children even then. A 15 year old should be chasing girls and goofing off, not calling up 6 year olds.

    When the 25th anniversary edition of Thriller came out, I just couldn't make myself buy it. Although he was acquitted, buying the album felt like I was enabling his behavior. Andrew Sullivan summed it up best for me in his blog, (sic) the man I admired and enjoyed died a long time ago, a shell of a human being has been walking around for a long time. RIP, Michael.
  • FraiserFan
    Oh how wonderful!!! Yet another "hipper than thou" (and perhaps more importantly in this case, apparently under 40) musical wonderkind who apparently isn't aware that popular music existed BEFORE 1980. Many of us who were well OVER the age of 10 when Thriller came out are aware that Michael Jackson had a career LONG before that album (please Google "Jackson 5" for further information) or that the Bee Gees did NOT suddenly spring on the scene with Saturday Night Fever (I hate that period for them, but LOVE their late 60s/early 70s works...again, a quick Google search could prove enlightening for those who have no idea what I'm talking about here).

    I'm sorry, but being dismissive of artists (whether you actually like their STYLE of music or not) whose careers have lasted over 35 years (in both of the above cases) on the basis of one example from a brief fraction of that time is either ignorant or deliberately obtuse, neither or which is generally the sign of a true moderate.

    From:
    A Libertarian who at least appreciates what some have accomplished, whether it's to my taste or not...oh, I also enjoyed the Police reunion tour BOTH times I saw it (having been a fan since my college days - back when they first started together in the late 70s)...even though they obviously weren't terribly good during the beginning leg.
  • smartguy19
    Count me among those who preferred Synchronicity. Not because Thriller was "Bad" it was great. But Synchronicity was the best album ever made. 1983 was just amazing with these two great albums out. Michael Jackson came out with Thriller and was number one for a pretty long time. And then came Synchronicity and it actually blew it away for about two or three months. Every Breath You Take was number one forever and was absolutley inescapable.

    What made Thriller different than any other album though was that Michael Jackson just keep releasing singles. Its run on the charts should've been long past but then he came out with the greatest video of all-time for Thriller. It was of course an amazing song to boot and the album actually went back to number one something like a year and a half after it had been released. Absolutely amazing.

    So here's to the class of '83, you either liked the Police or you liked Michael Jackson. Most of us though, liked both.
  • guillermonline
    This is crazy !!! We are all talking about mega stars when we`re talking about Jacko, The Bee Gees, The Beatles or ABBA. Each one in their type has his impronta in history music. We cannot say tha Bach is better than Mozart or Chopin. (obviously separeting distance between all of them). Jackson is unforgetable and the King of Pop, The Bee Gees are the Kings of Disco and the only band in history to have numbers one in five decadates consecutives., the rock were before and after The Beatles, ABBA the only band which could put at the top all the themes of each album.
    Congratulations to all of them...they will never be imitated by nobady, they are just only ones.
  • Annette123
    How do you know MJ was a pedophile. It normally takes one to know one ! Have'nt you ever heard of people who would do anything for money especially with people like MJ ? The kid himself admitted that he made up the story. I wonder how this boy and his family got away with it after stealing millions from MJ to get the story over with.

    Make this a better world by being more human please.
  • "It takes one to know one." Wow. What a great comeback. It is, without a doubt, the stupidest thing that could have been said. And then you whine about me being more human?

    There was more than one kid. Jackson admitted to giving kids alcohol and sleeping with them. The parents are just as liable as Jackson was. I'm sure there were people who made baseless accusations. But, since we are going to pull out stupid truisms, where there's smoke, there's fire. And Jackson made a hell of a lot of smoke with his own behavior.

    Good riddance.
  • Annette123
    Just keep in mind that a person is presumed innocent unless found guilty. I am sure MJ had his problems like other human beings but he was found not guilty in court. I am not the type to beleive everything I hear unless it is legal.
  • I'd say you're the kind who refuses to believe anything bad about their "hero" but has no problems making questionable statements about those who aren't brainwashed.

    Child molestation cases are notoriously hard to prosecute. I hope you are never put in a position where you have to choose between believing a child you love and what can be proven in a court of law, particularly if the defendant is willing and able to throw millions of dollars into obfuscating every point of evidence.
  • Annette123
    You cannot judge me as brainwashed because you do not know me. I agree with you that child molestation is hard to prove, but there are ways and means and many cases have been proved worldover.

    I have been following MJ since childhood and I think the biggest problem with MJ is that he never grew up (Peter Pan). As a journalist and newscaster I followed his cases in court and I am utterly disgusted with so many so called journalists who do not observe one of the most important regulation of our profession which is :- fact are sacred and comments are free. It is obvious that these so called journalists are hungry for scoops to advance in their career, but some people on the street unfortunately beleive these stories and a public figure like MJ is subject to public scrutiny and is not legally protected for malfamation.

    It is very hard to be in that position and beleive me I know it because I have been through it many times as a public figure in my country. Another factor which you have to consider is the fact that MJ was a coloured man and unfortunately even at this time and age racism is still an issue.

    So my conclusion is at this point :- why don't we let MJ rest in peace.
  • I judge you as brainwashed based on your actions, I don't need to know anything else. It's a hell of a lot more than you had when you called me a child molestor.

    I don't care what Jackson's problems were. Millions of people have had even worse lives and ended up not getting kids liquored up and sleeping with them. At some point, you have to quit blaming your past and accept responsibility for your life. Jackson never did that? That's his fault.

    Facts are sacred? I guess that's how you came up with "It takes one to know one."

    The idea that public figures are not protected from DEFAMATION is pure crap. Carol Burnett proved that when she successfully sued the National Enquirer. The fact is that Jackson never tried to stop anyone from printing that he molested children...why is that? One reason is that he couldn't prove the claims were false. The other reason is that people like you would bend over backwards to make sure that he wasn't hurt by such claims, whether they be false or not.

    Buddy, I've been the subject of press conferences by a Congressional candidate. I know what it means to be attacked in public. The idea that any of this has to do with the color of Jackson's skin is just a smokescreen, and you do everyone a disservice to even bring it up.

    So my conclusion at this point is let "MJ" roast in hell...along with the people who enabled his sick life.
  • Annette123
    Dear Sir,



    First and foremost I did not call you a child molester, in plain good old English I quote what I previously wrote :- Normally it takes one to know one. The word normally makes a lot of different. I have no right to accuse you of anything because I do not know you as you cannot accuse me of being brainwashed because you do not know me. According to my culture calling somebody you do not know a buddy is very rude, but my culture taught us to respect other cultures. As far as I know a buddy means a friend which I am not because I do not know you from Adam.



    Now on to media law, even I won a case when a journalist accused me of misquoting our Prime Minister to give an advantage to the opposition party. It was quite evident that he misquoted me to damage my reputation as a journalist but I could not take a journalist to court when he alleged that I was diagnosed with terminal cancer ten years ago. I was advised that it is useless going to court since I am liable to public scrutiny. So if I were you I would read law before quoting it and this is international law.



    Sorry I cannot keep up this correspondence because I would rather enjoy a swim and my holidays than waste time on stupid correspondence with somebody who seems to belong to a totally different culture.



    Regards,

    A. Beaumont
  • First and foremost I did not call you a child molester, in plain good old English I quote what I previously wrote :- Normally it takes one to know one. The word normally makes a lot of different.

    No, it really doesn't. It's clear that you were trying malign me for daring to speak my mind about a public entity. Now you want to back off from it. Fine. NORMALLY, an apology is in order. Not a whining statement about culture.

    Now on to media law, even I won a case when a journalist accused me of misquoting our Prime Minister to give an advantage to the opposition party. It was quite evident that he misquoted me to damage my reputation as a journalist but I could not take a journalist to court when he alleged that I was diagnosed with terminal cancer ten years ago. I was advised that it is useless going to court since I am liable to public scrutiny. So if I were you I would read law before quoting it and this is international law.
    Give me a break. Do whatever you want. Besides that, I never quoted any law. I don't know where you get that kind of statement. I don't know what country you're in or what international law might be, but I know damn well that public figures can sue for defamation. Jackson didn't. He never even tried to give a different side of the story. He just counted on the brain-dead Kool-aid drinkers to forgive him. And they did.

    Sorry I cannot keep up this correspondence because I would rather enjoy a swim and my holidays than waste time on stupid correspondence with somebody who seems to belong to a totally different culture.

    Enjoy the swim. Again with the culture thing? Is that supposed to be some kind of insult or what? In my culture, we don't accuse people of being child molestors without any basis and then wimp out with a lame excuse about culture.
  • Annette123
    bonjour missiour
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC