An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Before you know it, Congress might actually start READING the bills!

Miracles and wonders, my friends. Miracles and wonders indeed. Among the various campaign promises made by Barack Obama during the roughly two decade long 2008 presidential race, one of the first to get chucked under the bus after he took office was his promise to post all bills online for five days before signing them. This, supposedly, would give the public time to read them and comment. It was a nice idea, but I don’t know that’s it’s even been done once since he took office. Plus, as many have pointed out, it’s not all that useful either. Once the bill reaches his desk it’s not going to change unless he vetoes it.

Now, apparently, the administration is owning up to the broken promise and looking at changing the timing of the publication cycle.

Now, in a tacit acknowledgment that the campaign pledge was easier to make than to fulfill, the White House is changing its terms. Instead of starting the five-day clock when Congress passes a bill, administration officials say they intend to start it earlier and post the bills sooner.

“In order to continue providing the American people more transparency in government, once it is clear that a bill will be coming to the president’s desk, the White House will post the bill online,” said Nick Shapiro, a White House spokesman. “This will give the American people a greater ability to review the bill, often many more than five days before the president signs it into law.”

They aren’t committing themselves to exactly how far in advance the bills will be posted, of course, but half a loaf is better than none as they say. If there is an army of bloggers out there reading the bills before they come to a vote, there could be actual time for feedback to be provided and the perpetrators might be shamed into taking some of the more odious passages out.

And hey… I’m not getting my hopes up here, but just imagine. If we’re all reading the bills before they come to a vote, might our legislators begin doing the same? Oh, who am I kidding? We’ll all have free unicorns and puppies in our garages first.

  • DLS
    1. Don't forget, that certain details his administration releases to the news, figures of various kinds, aren't actual counts but estimates or suppositions. Such poor-quality bread and circus stuff is perfectly okay with those who want to believe what these people tell them.

    2. Don't forget also that Obama and his team (not to mention the Dems in Congress) are far from squeaky clean or honest and upright necessarily in all their motives about everything they have done or intend to do. Look at the managed bank consolidation and what they have done and are doing with the Detroit automakers. (Today's news here in DET metro is a longer than prior-to-now story about the liability problems with these two companies, the "new" Chrysler and the "new" GM. While junk lawsuits are a problem -- particularly punitive damage awards*, the blanket liability being sought is spooky as well as elitist; this was set up by the Obama crowd, whose hands are far from wanting to remove themselves from directing these companies and their product lines and operations. Aside from wondering to what extent the Washington people will continue misdeeds with "AmCars," it also, as was reported, something else. So many people already refuse ever to buy a car from these companies, especially GM, but this blanket liability issuance itself is a sound reason to boycott the companies completely and to advertise and admonish the public to boycott these companies.)

    3. Whatever happened to THOMAS and the initial post-1994 GOP routine posting of bills long before they were voted on? (The answer is, the GOP became like Dems, happy with power in Washington.)

    4. An alternative to THOMAS:

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/all


    * More desperate and greedy governments than now will start taxing them later. It will be for the money, for Dems will tax these probably more than "tort reformist" GOP politicians would (reformists want to cap damage award amounts, typically). You have been warned once more.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC