An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

USA: Joys Of Bus Ride In Times Of Crisis

bus_travel.jpg

My fascination for bus rides and backpacking/trekking has remained intact. I was delighted to learn that even among the car-loving Americans, bus travel is now becoming popular. Well, this may cause a social and economic revolution in the USA!!!

People are more “loath to get into their cars.” The Federal Highway Administration says Americans drove 81 billion fewer miles in the year ended January 2009 than in the previous year, reports WSJ.

The Week magazine says: “Hard economic times are pushing even well-heeled travelers to Greyhound, and many are pleasantly surprised.”

It is said that if your destination is less than 5 to 6 hours away a bus could take you there faster than an aircraft, if you take into consideration the time it takes for waiting at the airport. “Additionally a bus would reach you right up to the downtown area which makes it so much easier to find your way about in the city.”

The WSJ writes: “In April, Greyhound Lines Inc. launched 102 new ‘motor-coaches’ in the Northeast featuring leather seats, additional legroom, Wi-Fi access and power outlets in every row. BoltBus, an East Coast joint venture it launched with Peter Pan Bus Lines Inc., boasts similar perks, giving its buses a more ‘luxurious feel,’ — and fares that run as little as $1 each way if you book far enough in advance.

“Megabus.com, a Chicago-based unit of British-owned Stagecoach Group PLC, offers similar features. The line was launched three years ago with seven city destinations — where ridership has since tripled — and now services 30 cities in the Northeast and Midwest.

“Peter Pan itself is in the process of installing Wi-Fi into 150 of its existing buses this year, while its new buses will come Wi-Fi-equipped.

“The new breed of buses also has a cleaner, more-luxurious feel — whether it’s cup holders at seats, spiffier bathrooms or tables that allow commuters to spread out and get some work done on the ride.”
More here…

It seems that in the coming months/years if the bus and train combo continue to provide cheaper and comfortable travel many well-to-do people might also opt for public transportation. My earlier post here….

Once you are hooked on to bus/train travel then you would think twice before spending a much larger amount on car travel. Moreover you can breathe easy and enjoy the scenery around instead of cursing some other driver in front of you.

  • DLS
    Swaraaj,

    Don't rush to imagine a dream state in this country (USA) alien to it.

    The key is in the news story you quoted: "Hard economic times."

    Automobility is desired throughout the world and is especially enjoyed in the USA because of its heritage of freedom and individuality (an improvement over more backward or deprivational, oppressive collectivist societies, or merely much poorer societies at this time).

    "Discovering" the bus is not much different than another phenomenon that was only changed in the last several years, but not in the way you would want or unrealistically expect, Swaraaj. The Wall Street Journal did a story in the mid-1990s about how people in the Eastern USA had greatly overpriced, poor air service, and these people overlooked another form of collective transport as an alternative, the train. (An example given was a trip from Chicago to Milwaukee; the train cost a tiny fraction of air travel and required less time overall to make the trip.) The result wasn't that people discovered trains and began riding them in the Eastern USA. Rather, they continued to fly, and eventually the lower-cost, more-modern Western USA discount airline model, and one discount airline, began serving the Eastern USA. (It was joined by other airlines concentrating primarily on the Eastern USA market, which had been poorly under-served.)

    I have quite a lot of experience with riding trains (Amtrak as well as private excursion trains; on Amtrak I have sometimes taken my bicycle with me; I used to ride as much as 60 miles -- 100 km -- a day at one time) as well as buses, but that has never stopped me from driving, not only multi-day trips but approximately thirty trips or more over one thousand miles (that's over sixteen hundred-plus kilometers), and something like 60-80 trips over 800 miles (1,300 km or longer) in a single day. Most others I know aren't quite as enamored of such distances, but they still overwhelmingly prefer driving for most nearby inter-city travel, and for longer trips they prefer to fly to save time. (Also, Amtrak is often poor service.)

    People aren't going to suddenly change to riding buses for inter-city (as well as metro area) travel en masse, or trains, either. Advocates or fans of modern high-speed rail (and I am a fan of this mode of travel) need to be realistic, particularly in the USA and Canada with its lighter population density as contrasted with western Europe, not the least to say about India-Pakistan, and its much greater distances.

    People may be pleasantly surprised now that some are forced to consider taking collective transport, but that in no way leads to the conclusion they have chosen a new way of life and view of travel, and that they are abandoning their cars. (They will rightly resent any pathological efforts by people in government to try to make people, other than those in government, of course, change in this manner, such as punitive new fuel or motor-vehicle taxes and other attempts at properly-loathed social engineering.)

    Keep things in perspective. It's nice to know that attention and improvements are being made to Greyhound inter-city buses. (This is particularly true if there ever is sanity in Washington and the subsidy of money-losing small-market air travel is ended.) It's even nice to conceive of an improved rail network with feeder buses serving every place else, as well as having metro transit extensions to adjacent metro areas. But it's not going to be a mass change of lifestyle and preference, from automobility to mass transport. (Only once our population gets highly aged and some drivers become incompetent would there be any switch, and this would merely be of necessity, not due necessarily to personal preference.) It's simply good to know that bus service is improving, and who knows, could someday be an intelligent object of stimulus and other measures (positive measures) by the federal government (even a train-bus network on the ground similar to, say, Mexico, as well as India-Pakistan).

    And of course, the real story is that the economy here continues to be in bad shape, which is why more people are taking the bus or considering (having to do) it. "Hard economic times." That's the real story.
  • DLS
    If more buses had passengers like those two in the foreground, maybe more Americans would travel by bus.

    Note on fancier buses -- they've been in the USA for years, Swaraaj. Decades ago one example I had admired from the street was Boss Bus of America. Along with excursions there are regularly scheduled runs, not only from metro areas to airports, but inter-city runs, such as a company in Upstate New York that does runs down to New York City, for example:

    http://www.coachusa.com/shortline/

    These may be desireable already for elderly people and also for ordinary people in wintertime who don't want to drive in winter weather.

    (You can have your thread back now.)
  • windy_lea
    To be honest, a lot of my thoughts on this fall in line with the first commenter. I don't necessarily think this represents a permanent change--although I think it could have the potential to change the trends a little. I agree that most Americans are way too used to the individuality and freedom (and, honestly, opportunities to show off), and that, coupled with the relatively low population density of huge chunks of the US, among other factors, pretty much promises that people will continue to drive as much as they possibly can. Only fiscal concerns that directly impact them--having less money or higher gas prices--really seem to make a difference. Even I enjoy driving my car--although I'd rather have a well-integrated public transport that would allow me to put aside my car most of the week.


    I'll admit, though, that I'd rather the trains be the main transport than buses, if I were to give up my car. The last time I checked, flights and trains were both more expensive than the amount of gas I would have to pay for travel out of state. And I'll personally pick a car over a bus for a long ride, because I get car-sick unless I'm the driver, and buses make me more ill than almost any other form of transport--except boats.
  • windy_lea
    I think it's cool about the new buses, though!
  • DLS
    I like the news about the buses. (No, that's not me in the background of the photo, sadly.)

    Note "power outlets in every row." This is something I liked on the Caltrain "gallery cars" when I went back to the Bay Area for a week last year. (All I had with me was a cell phone but I could recharge the battery while on the train because it has outlets in the cars.)
  • Simone49
    Bus travel is a trend that is here to stay and will be especially popular in hard times. Another good place to look for bus tickets is http://www.gotobus.com/ which offers both luxury and cheap bus services.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC